A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

SI Comments - Cooper



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old January 14th 13, 12:01 AM posted to alt.photography,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Peter[_18_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default SI Comments - Cooper

On 1/12/2013 2:31 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-12 10:44:59 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 1:25 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 10:18:57 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 1:07 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 09:30:02 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 10:38 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 07:24:26 -0800, Peter said:


Le Snip



True. I was too focused on other issues, that I didn't think.

So, betting on the ponies can disrupt your thinking, leading to
noisy
photographs.


Now you sound like a cop, questioning a suspect! ;-)

Just the facts ma... ...er, sir.


Has email made the facts obsolete?

No! The Mayan calendar has.


Then we no longer exist and nothing matters


So you too can see into the future?
I have a similar take on that sort of thing when the clock finally winds
down.


No! Into the past. It already happened. This group is but a figment of
my imagination, since nothing exists anymore. (if it ever did.)

--
PeterN
  #12  
Old January 14th 13, 12:09 AM posted to alt.photography,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default SI Comments - Cooper

On 2013-01-13 15:01:44 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/12/2013 2:31 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-12 10:44:59 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 1:25 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 10:18:57 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 1:07 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 09:30:02 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 10:38 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 07:24:26 -0800, Peter said:


Le Snip



True. I was too focused on other issues, that I didn't think.

So, betting on the ponies can disrupt your thinking, leading to
noisy
photographs.


Now you sound like a cop, questioning a suspect! ;-)

Just the facts ma... ...er, sir.


Has email made the facts obsolete?

No! The Mayan calendar has.


Then we no longer exist and nothing matters


So you too can see into the future?
I have a similar take on that sort of thing when the clock finally winds
down.


No! Into the past. It already happened. This group is but a figment of
my imagination, since nothing exists anymore. (if it ever did.)


....however, since the existence of this group is dependent on your
imagination, we are able to ascertain that your imagination and its
related figments exist.
In the future neither of us, and your imagination will exist. As a
result the Usenet photogroups will be gone never to reappear in that
figment of your imagination.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #13  
Old January 14th 13, 02:32 AM posted to alt.photography,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Peter[_18_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default SI Comments - Cooper

On 1/13/2013 6:09 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-13 15:01:44 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/12/2013 2:31 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-12 10:44:59 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 1:25 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 10:18:57 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 1:07 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 09:30:02 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 10:38 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 07:24:26 -0800, Peter said:

Le Snip



True. I was too focused on other issues, that I didn't think.

So, betting on the ponies can disrupt your thinking, leading to
noisy
photographs.


Now you sound like a cop, questioning a suspect! ;-)

Just the facts ma... ...er, sir.


Has email made the facts obsolete?

No! The Mayan calendar has.


Then we no longer exist and nothing matters

So you too can see into the future?
I have a similar take on that sort of thing when the clock finally winds
down.


No! Into the past. It already happened. This group is but a figment of
my imagination, since nothing exists anymore. (if it ever did.)


...however, since the existence of this group is dependent on your
imagination, we are able to ascertain that your imagination and its
related figments exist.
In the future neither of us, and your imagination will exist. As a
result the Usenet photogroups will be gone never to reappear in that
figment of your imagination.


Unless I continue it after my reincarnation.

--
PeterN
  #14  
Old January 14th 13, 02:48 AM posted to alt.photography,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default SI Comments - Cooper

On 2013-01-13 17:32:10 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/13/2013 6:09 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-13 15:01:44 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/12/2013 2:31 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-12 10:44:59 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 1:25 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 10:18:57 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 1:07 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 09:30:02 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 10:38 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 07:24:26 -0800, Peter said:

Le Snip



True. I was too focused on other issues, that I didn't think.

So, betting on the ponies can disrupt your thinking, leading to
noisy
photographs.


Now you sound like a cop, questioning a suspect! ;-)

Just the facts ma... ...er, sir.


Has email made the facts obsolete?

No! The Mayan calendar has.


Then we no longer exist and nothing matters

So you too can see into the future?
I have a similar take on that sort of thing when the clock finally winds
down.


No! Into the past. It already happened. This group is but a figment of
my imagination, since nothing exists anymore. (if it ever did.)


...however, since the existence of this group is dependent on your
imagination, we are able to ascertain that your imagination and its
related figments exist.
In the future neither of us, and your imagination will exist. As a
result the Usenet photogroups will be gone never to reappear in that
figment of your imagination.


Unless I continue it after my reincarnation.


So, you are a Buddhist-Christian then?

--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #15  
Old January 14th 13, 02:56 AM posted to alt.photography,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Peter[_18_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default SI Comments - Cooper

On 1/13/2013 8:48 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-13 17:32:10 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/13/2013 6:09 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-13 15:01:44 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/12/2013 2:31 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-12 10:44:59 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 1:25 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 10:18:57 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 1:07 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 09:30:02 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 10:38 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 07:24:26 -0800, Peter
said:

Le Snip



True. I was too focused on other issues, that I didn't think.

So, betting on the ponies can disrupt your thinking, leading to
noisy
photographs.


Now you sound like a cop, questioning a suspect! ;-)

Just the facts ma... ...er, sir.


Has email made the facts obsolete?

No! The Mayan calendar has.


Then we no longer exist and nothing matters

So you too can see into the future?
I have a similar take on that sort of thing when the clock finally
winds
down.


No! Into the past. It already happened. This group is but a figment of
my imagination, since nothing exists anymore. (if it ever did.)

...however, since the existence of this group is dependent on your
imagination, we are able to ascertain that your imagination and its
related figments exist.
In the future neither of us, and your imagination will exist. As a
result the Usenet photogroups will be gone never to reappear in that
figment of your imagination.


Unless I continue it after my reincarnation.


So, you are a Buddhist-Christian then?


No! A Descatian: (Cogito ergo sum )

--
PeterN
  #16  
Old January 14th 13, 03:01 AM posted to alt.photography,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Peter[_18_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default SI Comments - Cooper

On 1/13/2013 8:56 PM, Peter wrote:
On 1/13/2013 8:48 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-13 17:32:10 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/13/2013 6:09 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-13 15:01:44 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/12/2013 2:31 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-12 10:44:59 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 1:25 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 10:18:57 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 1:07 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 09:30:02 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 10:38 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 07:24:26 -0800, Peter
said:

Le Snip



True. I was too focused on other issues, that I didn't think.

So, betting on the ponies can disrupt your thinking, leading to
noisy
photographs.


Now you sound like a cop, questioning a suspect! ;-)

Just the facts ma... ...er, sir.


Has email made the facts obsolete?

No! The Mayan calendar has.


Then we no longer exist and nothing matters

So you too can see into the future?
I have a similar take on that sort of thing when the clock finally
winds
down.


No! Into the past. It already happened. This group is but a figment of
my imagination, since nothing exists anymore. (if it ever did.)

...however, since the existence of this group is dependent on your
imagination, we are able to ascertain that your imagination and its
related figments exist.
In the future neither of us, and your imagination will exist. As a
result the Usenet photogroups will be gone never to reappear in that
figment of your imagination.


Unless I continue it after my reincarnation.


So, you are a Buddhist-Christian then?


No! A Descatian: (Cogito ergo sum )


Oops: that should have been "Descartian."

--
PeterN
  #17  
Old January 14th 13, 03:17 AM posted to alt.photography,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default SI Comments - Cooper

On 2013-01-13 18:01:46 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/13/2013 8:56 PM, Peter wrote:
On 1/13/2013 8:48 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-13 17:32:10 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/13/2013 6:09 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-13 15:01:44 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/12/2013 2:31 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-12 10:44:59 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 1:25 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 10:18:57 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 1:07 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 09:30:02 -0800, Peter said:

On 1/11/2013 10:38 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-11 07:24:26 -0800, Peter
said:

Le Snip



True. I was too focused on other issues, that I didn't think.

So, betting on the ponies can disrupt your thinking, leading to
noisy
photographs.


Now you sound like a cop, questioning a suspect! ;-)

Just the facts ma... ...er, sir.


Has email made the facts obsolete?

No! The Mayan calendar has.


Then we no longer exist and nothing matters

So you too can see into the future?
I have a similar take on that sort of thing when the clock finally
winds
down.


No! Into the past. It already happened. This group is but a figment of
my imagination, since nothing exists anymore. (if it ever did.)

...however, since the existence of this group is dependent on your
imagination, we are able to ascertain that your imagination and its
related figments exist.
In the future neither of us, and your imagination will exist. As a
result the Usenet photogroups will be gone never to reappear in that
figment of your imagination.


Unless I continue it after my reincarnation.

So, you are a Buddhist-Christian then?


No! A Descatian: (Cogito ergo sum )


Oops: that should have been "Descartian."


Aah! A thinking, coordinated worshipper of map projections. That make sense.



I think of myself as a "Dudist" leaning atheist.
http://dudeism.com/whatisdudeism/

--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #18  
Old January 14th 13, 12:43 PM posted to alt.photography,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Peter[_18_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default SI Comments - Cooper

On 1/13/2013 9:17 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2013-01-13 18:01:46 -0800, Peter said:


snip



Oops: that should have been "Descartian."


Aah! A thinking, coordinated worshipper of map projections. That make
sense.



I think of myself as a "Dudist" leaning atheist.
http://dudeism.com/whatisdudeism/



I tried that. But my wife had it confused with Aslongasyur Doism.

"As long as you have nothing to do, do this, and while yur attit, do that.

--
PeterN

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PING: Tony Cooper Savageduck[_3_] Digital Photography 1 September 29th 11 07:26 AM
(SI) People want comments - here's comments! Sounds of the season. [email protected] 35mm Photo Equipment 0 September 24th 10 03:13 AM
comments please - red tulip_03-comments please.jpg JLord remove \clothes\ before replying - \clothe Photographing Nature 0 April 19th 05 10:58 PM
Comments Claim Guy Digital Photography 10 December 6th 04 02:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.