If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Canon EOS lens decision: EF 24-105mmf/4L IS vs EF-S 17-55mmf/2.8IS for 300D
I'm in the hunt for a high quality replacement for the kit lens (EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6) of my Canon 300D/Digital Rebel. I'm not thrilled with the sharpness of the kit lens, and it's fairly limited for indoor available light photography with its relatively small max aperture. I'd like to solicit opinions on the following options I'm narrowed down to. My periodic work for local band shows, and weddings is prompting the upgrade. Part of my hesitation on some of these is the projected longevity of the EF-S mount, and whether full frame digital SLR's might come into my reach one day. EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Autofocus Lens for Select Digital Cameras. This is my front-runner right now. $1149 Pros: f/2.8 and IS and good zoom range for my use. Wow. This combo of features will be very handy in live music lighting situations. Cons: Not L series glass. Does this mean I won't see great sharpeness? Won't work on FF cameras....but do I care? If EF-S will be around a while, I don't. When I get a 2nd body, it'll probably be a 30D or successor. EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM pros: compatible with full frame, L series glass, long end provides a lot of shooting flexibility Cons: Not f2.8 for shallowest DoF, short end is relatively long/poor for groups in tight spaces, and evidently pretty lousy with vignetting when used full frame anyway, despite the L glass. Any options I'm missing? Does Sigma have offerings that I should be considering? I got burned in the EOS film world with their otherwise nice f/2.8 lenses (I have a 28-70 and 70-210 Sigma APO that I now can't use with the digirebel since Canon changed their aperture control algorithm cleverly in a way the Sigmas won't respond to, and these are too old to be chip upgradeable). I have a leaning toward Canon for this reason. Thanks in advance for any experiences or opinions Best Regards, -- Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Canon EOS lens decision: EF 24-105mmf/4L IS vs EF-S 17-55mmf/2.8IS for 300D
Todd H. wrote:
I'm in the hunt for a high quality replacement for the kit lens (EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6) of my Canon 300D/Digital Rebel. I'm not thrilled with the sharpness of the kit lens, and it's fairly limited for indoor available light photography with its relatively small max aperture. I'd like to solicit opinions on the following options I'm narrowed down to. My periodic work for local band shows, and weddings is prompting the upgrade. Part of my hesitation on some of these is the projected longevity of the EF-S mount, and whether full frame digital SLR's might come into my reach one day. EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Autofocus Lens for Select Digital Cameras. This is my front-runner right now. $1149 Pros: f/2.8 and IS and good zoom range for my use. Wow. This combo of features will be very handy in live music lighting situations. Cons: Not L series glass. Does this mean I won't see great sharpeness? There are many non-L lenses very sharp, even sharper than L. http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/len...5_28/index.htm Won't work on FF cameras....but do I care? If EF-S will be around a while, I don't. When I get a 2nd body, it'll probably be a 30D or successor. When 1.3x or 1x cameras are priced very close to 1.6x, you might want a larger sensor for lower noise and higher resolution. EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM pros: compatible with full frame, L series glass, long end provides a lot of shooting flexibility Cons: Not f2.8 for shallowest DoF And not much brighter than your f/5.6, and dimmer than your f/3.5. short end is relatively long/poor for groups in tight spaces, and evidently pretty lousy with vignetting when used full frame anyway, despite the L glass. Any options I'm missing? Canon 35/2 Canon 50/1.8 Canon 85/1.8 Canon 16-35/2.8 Canon 24-70/2.8 Canon 70-200/2.8 IS For non-low-light: Canon 20-35/3.5-4.5 Canon 28-135/3.5-5.6 IS Canon 70-300/4-5.6 IS Does Sigma have offerings that I should be considering? I got burned in the EOS film world with their otherwise nice f/2.8 lenses (I have a 28-70 and 70-210 Sigma APO that I now can't use with the digirebel since Canon changed their aperture control algorithm cleverly in a way the Sigmas won't respond to, and these are too old to be chip upgradeable). I have a leaning toward Canon for this reason. And the better Sigma lenses are not that much cheaper, and still worse quality than Canon. http://digitcamera.tripod.com/#slr |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Schneider Large-Format Lens TRADE!!! | Bill Gillooly | General Equipment For Sale | 2 | February 20th 05 06:43 AM |
FS: Canon FTb 35mm | Peter | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | December 9th 04 01:54 AM |
FS: Canon FTb Cameras | Peter | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | November 18th 04 02:57 AM |
Nanofilm Ultra Clarity on Canon lens | Terry | Digital Photography | 11 | August 27th 04 07:08 PM |
FA Canon EOS Bodies and "L" lens & access... | J&C | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 4 | December 21st 03 07:32 PM |