If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
"Dallas" wrote in message
newsan.2004.10.02.05.37.19.115000@realphoto... On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 13:09:22 -0400, jimkramer had this to say: "Alan Browne" wrote in message ... Dallas wrote: Every single bit of Sony equipment I have works and works very well, including the "Walkman" I have here which is near 25 years old. Me too; but remember who you are talking to. Jim Kramer Okay. All Sony products are wonderful and everyone should buy them -- DD™ "And that's all I got to say about that" ~ FG Now, just say the same thing about Canon and all will be forgiven ;-) Jim Kramer |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Dallas wrote in message news:pan.2004.09.30.16.00.28.282000@realphoto...
No, out the door.... Not wanting to start anything up, but I am hearing more than just a few reports of discontent from early 20D owners. Are there QC issues with the camera? Are manufacturers cutting QC corners just to have the latest thing out first? This is not just limited to Canon, but I have also heard of problems with the Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 EDIF VR not working. Fortunately I haven't had any problems with my lens, but with the amount of electronics involved, I don't expect it to work forever without some kind of trouble. Similarly, I wonder if Konica Minolta will have a bug free anti-shake system in their new DSLR? What's your opinion on the rate at which new technology is being foisted on the imaging sector in relation to the QC of the products we buy? |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Chris Brown wrote:
In article pan.2004.09.30.16.00.28.282000@realphoto, Dallas wrote: Not wanting to start anything up, but I am hearing more than just a few reports of discontent from early 20D owners. Are there QC issues with the camera? It sounds like the reported problems are software related. Sad to say (and I people often forget that printers, scanners, digital (ok, not only digital, applies to af film cameras aswell) are really embedded computers running some "contraption". Which is why printers, scanners and copiers by a company that will not be named getting stuck in various states and needing a powerdown more often than convinient is relevant to photography. say this as a software engineer myself), the software industry is relatively immature compared to many other engineering disciplines, and has "issues" regarding its ability to turn out consistently reliable products. To a large extent, software that drives personal computers and related consumer electronics (such as digital cameras - you know the digital EOSes run an MS-DOS clone?) does tend to rely somewhat on the early end-users discovering problems. As it happens, Canon have just announced new firmware for this camera. Hopefully this should fix these teething troubles. Maybe they should make it inconvinient for their developers to reboot the protoype testbeds... -- Sander +++ Out of cheese error +++ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Very disappointed with ACDSee 7 image display quality!! | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 5 | October 3rd 04 08:02 PM |
acdsee full screen display resampling quality lacking? | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 15 | September 13th 04 11:32 PM |
Computer control of Nikon D70 | Jeff Durham | Digital Photography | 3 | July 7th 04 10:58 PM |
JPEG Questions: Loss In Quality When "Saving" | Xtx99 | General Photography Techniques | 3 | April 8th 04 04:25 PM |