If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Develper for Delta-100
After many years of using Tmax-100 I'm going to taking a look
at using Ilford's Delta-100. My question involves which developer works best with it. I've gone out and bought a bottle of ilfosol-s and a bottle of infotec dd-x. Anyone have any experience with either of these developers with Delta-100? I'm interested in dilutions and temperatures that give you the best results. -- Keep working millions on welfare depend on you ------------------- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Develper for Delta-100
In article ,
Frank Pittel wrote: After many years of using Tmax-100 I'm going to taking a look at using Ilford's Delta-100. My question involves which developer works best with it. I've gone out and bought a bottle of ilfosol-s and a bottle of infotec dd-x. Anyone have any experience with either of these developers with Delta-100? I'm interested in dilutions and temperatures that give you the best results. Frank; Although I have not used both together, I have been using DDX with another 100 speed film recently, try 7 1/2 minutes @ 68F using a 1+9 dilution. Should give you a ballpark to work from. -- LF website http://members.bellatlantic.net/~gblank |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Develper for Delta-100
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:47:43 -0600, Frank Pittel
wrote: After many years of using Tmax-100 I'm going to taking a look at using Ilford's Delta-100. My question involves which developer works best with it. I've gone out and bought a bottle of ilfosol-s and a bottle of infotec dd-x. Anyone have any experience with either of these developers with Delta-100? I'm interested in dilutions and temperatures that give you the best results. Most temperatures for b&W hang around 68 degrees, but, as the real world knows, frequently the developer isn't that temp. I mix my own chemistry, but do not usually try to many fancy / specialised developers. I do it more so that I can mix a litre of developer that is fresh when I get a chance to get to the darkroom. A young family limits my darkroom time to what it was in my past. Going at least 1:1 dilution with stock developer solutions at time of use gives you a way of getting close to a useful processing time that isnt too long or short. Measure the temperature of the undiluted developer stock solution. Then figure out how close that is to the ideal temperature- 68, or whatever it is for that developer. Then make the mixed in water that different in the opposite direction. If your local water from the tap after filtering is still to gunky for direct use with developers there is still a way to do this with distilled. Keep 2 jugs of distilled water - one at room temperature or beside the radiator, etc. Keep the other one in the fridge. Then almost temperature can be mixed up.. If you end up with too mush distilled mixed, then just pour the excess back into the water jug. The easiest trick is to hunt down a little dial calculator gizmo that Kodak (maybe used to) sell as a part of thier darkroom data guide. Other vendors likely made them as well. It gives time vs. temperature relative to an developer number index that you dial in on the opposite edge of the dial. The power of this calculator is that it allows you to easily adjust development times to ideally suit your process. I have a condenser enlarger - Kodak say develop using 3 development numbers less on thier dial than thier published standard data to compensate for higher contrast for this enlarger characteristics. So that little gem got me closer to a full black to white print process. Then I found Fred's Pickers little book, six years after starting B&W hobbying The ideas discussed below come out of a little book by Fred Picker,called Zone VI Workshop circa 1974 that I found used many years ago. These ideas take a while to explain. Take the time to read it, and also try to make the time to run your own tests. They wil give you huge control over the process. So much control that I cannot imagine using a C-41 based B&W film, regardless of how convenient thay look at first blush. I am not a huge Zone System fanatic -but I do not want all grey all the time either out of my prints. So I do a one day calibration prceedure with each new film/developer combination I get into. I know it takes about a day, but the results pay dividends for years. Keep reading - it will be worth it to you too. It goes on - a bit like a mini-book now that I look it over with a spot of editting. But the original book the information came to me in I suspect is a very hahrd find these days. A light meter- either the handheld or through the lens reading types, reads everything and wants to make it like a grey card. So metering a grey card (or any flat evenly lit blank card surface) places it at ZV as I recall.. Zones in Fred's world got from 0 to 8 in roman numerals, I recall. I am typing this at work, so exact details of the book, at home are not at hand With the image of the test/grey card filling the frame, with it lit the same way it was metered, stop down 5 stops (via aperture, preferably, or a combination of aperture and shutter speed) making an exposure at each stop along the way. Go past zone zero a couple of shots as well. This can be done on the end of any film that your are shooting right now. Develop per film/developer manufacturers recommended times, The test shots will be minimally impacted, since thin areas on the negative we are trying to create by stopping down below the recommended meter reading are not very influenced by the precise developer action. Once the test film segment is dry, look carefully somewhere along the test shots part of the negative.. You will find a spot where there is just the slightest negative density in the exposure above the film base plus developer fog found in the un-exposed sprocket areas and between frames areas of the film (or film edges if it 35mm you are doing this on) . This exposure puts you at Z0 - as black a print as can be printed, by making the negative as thin as it can be before we wander into the film base plus fog density of the film. It might be found 5 frames from the first zone 5 (shot at the aperture and exposure setting as recommended by the meter). If it is then the film in your camera, and with you meter, lens, and shutter combination matches the film speed that the manufacturer rates thier film If it does not, figure out how far you get. If it is only four frames, and you start with a manufacturer rated 400 asa film, then in your set up, it is really working best to expose it at 200 asa. Take the negative of the first test exposure above film base plus fog, and put it in your enlarger. Set your enlarger to an aperture that is typical to what you print at, and an image size that is comfortable. Use a middle grade of photographic paper, (either by grade, or with the correct polycontrast filter/dichroic head setting). Set the timer to 3 seconds. Cover most of the enlarging paper with a covering card so that only about 1" is exposed. Expose it for 3s. Move the card to expose another 1" of the paper, as well as the first strip of paper that got exposed. Continure until the paper is all uncovered. Keep notes of how many strips you exposed, and accordingly, the longest time. Develop the paper for as long as the manufacture recommends. Don't pull it as soon as the first band of black appears. Once the print is fixed, washed, and dried, figure out the minumum exposure time it took to get to the maximum black on the print. This time will be the same time that we aim to get in the next part of the test to replicate for a white range test. Make note of the enlarger height, enlarger aperture and paper type if you can't finish the test until later If you are in a multi-enlarger facility, try to get back to the same unit, to rule out different light output due to varying lamp age. Now we are going to try to figure out how to process a roll of film so that the whites areas recorded on the film print up for the same exposure time in the darkrom as the darkest blacks. Because we are dealing with negatives, that means how dense do we want the developer to advance the portions of the film that we exposed to turn out prints as white in the finished product. It helps in the next part to expose three films to the same test conditions at the same shooting period. If not, then separate sessions can be done, but the results are not as quick to achieve. An alternate way is to shoot a film, three times, on 18, 9-17, and 18-24 , and develop 1-8 exposures separately from 9-17, from 18-24, however, cutting a film in this manner forces you to try to cut at the right place in the dark, and there are a lot of ways that things can go wrong along the way. Meter a test area/grey card again. Again, fill the frame of the camera. This time we are openning the aperture up, to expose the film more, to allow more density to be developed into the negative. With the image of the test are or grey card filling the frame, with it lit the same way it was metered, open up 3 stops (via aperture, preferably, or a combination of aperture and shutter speed) making an exposure at each stop along the way. Go past zone eight a couple of shots as well. This time we first develop according to manufacturers procesing time/temperature. Dry negatives, etc. Look for the one exposure that is the last one before no density changes are visible one exposure to the next. It should be the fourth one after the first zone 5 metered recommended exposure of the test area/grey card. It may not be; there may be films avaibale that can cover more than 8 stops of exposure latitude, but in my experinece I have yet to find them. Put the negative that is the one before staturation is encountered into the enlarger in the same set- up as was used previously to determinum maximum black time. This time expose the photographic paper in the same way, with a card being progressively removed. at 3 second exposure intervals. Develop, fix, wash and dry it. Then evaluate which time gives the slightest grey that is separate from the subsequent all white area. Figure out how much exposure time that this took. If it is the same time as the previous maximum black test right of the bat than you got very lucky the first time out. More likely it is either less time than the maximum black print exposure time or it is more. If it is less time, then there is not enough density being developed into the negative by the developer under evaluation. In this case we need to develop more. This is best done by as a first try developing the second test roll for 25% longer than the recommended development time. Repeat the printing susequent exposure strips process to see when the first grey in the test print is found. If it is after the time for maximum black, then we have compensated too much, and must refine the third roll test time to some time less than a 25% increase over the manufacturers recommended time. This time through the results ,when run and evaluated for the time to minumum grey over ful papper white should match closely to the maximum black exposure time, or you will know what future rols should be processed at to gte that result. Make a careful note of the time. or develoipment index number, if you have a dial calculator. Using this time you are now in control of how thing look in your finished print at the time that you take a picture using black and white film. If the first test roll print results in minumum grey with more time required than to get to maximum black, then we have over developed the film for our circumstances. For the second roll development try the manufacturese recommended time less 25%. Then you can refine in a manner described above. Mike Wilde. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Develper for Delta-100
In article ,
Mike Wilde wrote: Most temperatures for b&W hang around 68 degrees, but, as the real world knows, frequently the developer isn't that temp. Why & why not? -- LF website http://members.bellatlantic.net/~gblank |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Develper for Delta-100
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:57:22 GMT, Gregory W Blank
wrote: In article , Mike Wilde wrote: Most temperatures for b&W hang around 68 degrees, but, as the real world knows, frequently the developer isn't that temp. Why & why not? In my darkroom in the winter the basement goes down to 62 overnight, before the furnace kicks back up in the morning. I also do not have a hot air duct directly from the furnace to try to keep dust infiltration down. It takes until noon for the stock solutions to get up to 68, if I do not have the exhaust fan running to pull warmer air in from the rest of the house. . In the summer , when the air conditioning is on it is no problem to be as cold as the wintertime in the basement if one of my little ones leaves the door at the top of the basement stairs open all day while I am away at work. 68 has evolved into the reference standard for working at for a small tank for times detwen 5 and 10 minutes as manufacturers plan thier commercial formulations. When solutions get warmer it can be a real quick dunk in the developer soup. To get repeatable results when pouring into and out of a daylight tank as well as knock all air bubbles off and agitate once or twice when the total developing time is something like 3:30 is difficult. At the other end, trying to stay excited to agitate regularly when the time slides out past 12 minutes whe the developer is cold is a bit of a dull chore - hence the drive towards 68 degrees. Withe a dial calculator it is easy to see what the recommended time maps to for temperatures away from the reference time at 68. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Develper for Delta-100
In article ,
Mike Wilde wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:57:22 GMT, Gregory W Blank wrote: In article , Mike Wilde wrote: Most temperatures for b&W hang around 68 degrees, but, as the real world knows, frequently the developer isn't that temp. Why & why not? In my darkroom in the winter the basement goes down to 62 overnight, before the furnace kicks back up in the morning. I also do not have a hot air duct directly from the furnace to try to keep dust infiltration down. It takes until noon for the stock solutions to get up to 68, if I do not have the exhaust fan running to pull warmer air in from the rest of the house. . Most people regulate the temp by using something like an aquarium heater, in a tub of water. That is even if the desired temp is 68F. I personally have a tempered water regulator mounted permanently on my darkroom tap, although you can get a faucet mounting thermometer that allows the water to pass through it this being removable each time after use. When you mix the stock solution, with the desired amount of water for working dilution use tempered water, that way there is no waiting. Because I have a Jobo I turn every thing on and it takes 3/4 hour to come up to temp in winter, usually in summer its at temp or I run cool water to get it below temp,...so it then comes up. You can also do this using a tub and aquarium heater. As for agitation get a book or something to do while tending the tank, a small rotary base can probably be found at a reasonable price. A small radio or CD player makes the time more enjoyable. -- LF website http://members.bellatlantic.net/~gblank |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Develper for Delta-100
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 21:33:09 GMT, Gregory W Blank
wrote: In article , Mike Wilde wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:57:22 GMT, Gregory W Blank wrote: In article , Mike Wilde wrote: Most temperatures for b&W hang around 68 degrees, but, as the real world knows, frequently the developer isn't that temp. Why & why not? Most people regulate the temp by using something like an aquarium heater, in a tub of water. That is even if the desired temp is 68F. I personally have a tempered water regulator mounted permanently on my darkroom tap, although you can get a faucet mounting thermometer that allows the water to pass through it this being removable each time after use. When you mix the stock solution, with the desired amount of water for working dilution use tempered water, that way there is no waiting. Because I have a Jobo I turn every thing on and it takes 3/4 hour to come up to temp in winter, usually in summer its at temp or I run cool water to get it below temp,...so it then comes up. You can also do this using a tub and aquarium heater. As for agitation get a book or something to do while tending the tank, a small rotary base can probably be found at a reasonable price. A small radio or CD player makes the time more enjoyable. I was writing to the original questioner, who I presumed was a basic B&W hobbyist. I know that temp control can be much more precise. I develop C-41 and RA-4 on my own. I have taken the cheapo route to a Jobo like end performance situation: All dollar figures stated are in $ Canadian - currently about $0.75US buys a $1Can. This message wandered on to a longer treatise than I intended when I started writing it, but if you take the time read it over, and you will see why I have taken the route I have. The current darkroom evolved out of a long period of no darkroom activity for me. In the past I had progressed my photgraphic hobby to the stage of successfully shooting of a few weddings, in terms of business proficiency and developing colur prints from packaged chemistry in terms of techical progress, after doing scads of B&W for school and college yearbook efforts, etc.. Eight years ago I moved to shared accomodation with my then girl friend, now wife, and others. The darkroom gear went into storage. We later on our own moved into a dumpy apartment and saved like mad in two incomes towards buying a house. We then got sent on a work assignment from our native Toronto Canada to Brisbane, Australia for three and a half years. We had our first born child there. While there we had all housing, and auto expenses paid for, and had liqudated the apartment and car expenses at home. We had money to save even more, even with my wife at home with the little one. Preganacy complications on the second one brought us back to Toronto.in February 03 where he was born; doing just great. We had to find a house in a hurry, and then I put the press on to finish the basement as a play area for the kds, and to insulate it to save on energy costs. The darkroom wasn't put into service until November, after most of the other big inside improvenments were done. It was my reward, with about 8 years of negs behind me waiting for darkroom expression. I knew if it didn't wait until near the end the other projects could be years before they were finished. So i set out to equipment my new darkroom in the style that I know best, and anm still wholly happy with- wet silver. The digital revolution in my absense has been great for me from a wet silver perspective. I am not saying that digital will not have a place for its use in my future; I already have a low res digital capture camare function as a part of an analog camcorder that is great for e-mailing snaps to the grand-parents. All kinds of stuff I drooled over as a poor student is now available at modest prices. So I commenced a mostly on-line hunt, with my frugal instincts intact, wth goals to better what I had achieved in the past. Temperature control better than running water for colour work: Ued temperature controller that came out of a plastics extruding machine - $50 ebay. Originally it went up to 900F; I changed jumpers inside it to cut its range to 40-400F. This made it more sensitive to the range I need. It has PID control, meaning that it warms up fast, and cuts the heat back as it gets close to the set pont, with no overshoot. It has adjustable gain, and reset functions, so I tuned it to my volume of water, to allow a fast swap from C-41 to RA-4. To cool for C-41 to RA-4 transitions I just add cold water, and watch the temperature readout on the controller to know when you are just under, and then it heats to balance at the desired new temperature set point. The type J thermocouple temperature sensor needed for the above cost $ free.It was made from thermcouple extension wire, since was no need to tolerate high temperatures; I talked a process control shop to fuse a junction on one end of 2 feet of extesion wire for no cost. The power load control switch is a surplus relay, scavenged from an old furnace fan relay when th furnace was replaced last summer. It has a 24V coil which is powered off of a control transfoemr also scavenged from same old heating system. I will replace it with a solid state relay when the right one turns up surplus or I get annoyed with the thing clicking too much and spend the $30 it costs new. Housing for the water bath: I have used a cooler. It is surplus to my present needs, and is now dedicated to darkroom use - so I call this $free.-It holds about 35L water. The cover goes on overnight, or on the initial warm up on start up when I am first home from work, so that by after dinner / kids put to bed the thing is up to temp withing an hour or so of being fired up. Bath tempering: I use a 300W aquarium heater bought on sale at Superpet for $40. I have the manual thermostat in it wound way up so it won't cut out until about 120F. The temperature is controlled by power cycled under the temperature controller's load relay . An aquarium circulator pump evens out temperature distribution in the water bath, so the chemicals warm up faster; again on sale, $30 at Superpet. A scavenged hose is used to extend the intake to the far lower corner of cooler. To warm the chemicals themselves old photo plastic jugs float at present; Cheap 500mL amber glass $2 each / 1L $2.30 each presently are being sourced from a chemical supplier and bottle wholesaler to store ready solutions, as well as aqueous stock solutions to speed the making of ready to use stuff without fussing over the balance weight of 1g of this or that. The size of the cooler present easily accomodates 2L of each solution required. To dispense the right amount of chemistry into the tube for RA4 I have little plastic cups colour coded that have handles that hang over the edge in cooler and float one the water bath when filled; they are left to float in water when empty. In the cups I have incribed levels for 8x10, 11x14, 16x20 required volumes with permanent marker. These were garage sale acquired with the set costing $1. Sink This is a lagacy home made fibreglass over plywood 60" long, 16" deep, 6" high affair I made 20 years ago. $80 at the time I recall, because in my student days that was a lot of money to come up with after buying the enlarger a few months earlier. I am sure today a stainless sink could be e-bayed for less but shipping would be a killer. No autotempering valve faucet is fitted yet, instead I ue a cheapo dial thermometer fitted into a hole drilled into the outlet spigot of a used/recycled laundry tub faucet set; it works OK for me for now. Print and film finishing A better and morecompact print washer is planned to be made out of an aquarium conversion i have in my head for fabriaction this summer, after surplus glass is gleaned from this spring's spring clean up and garage sale season. Presently it is a big tray withan old auto tray siphon that uses a fair bit of real estate and water. Drying is with clothes pegs over the sink on a clotherline like affair. Next winter will likely see a crop of scavenged screen door screening material made into a series print drying racks on shelves under the sink. Film dryer Dust with a kids play room, carpetted next door was always going to be a challange. So I created a micro supor clean environment, and just keep the whole darkroom as cleans of dust as I can. I wash and photoflow wetting agent the film on the spools, shake them as dry as I can, and put them into a modified coffee can affair with a dessicant agent, appropriate sacers to ensure bst air flow, and a little cpu computer cooling fan to circulate the air. Apart from $30 for a whack of the Drierite dessicant,(which is periodically regenerated in the oven), all parts were free from scavanged sources. After drying the film is left on weighted hooks overnight to absorb some moisture from the air to take the curl out of it. the reels are put through the dishwasher to keep the photpflow concetrate residue out of the being carried over to the next uses developer. Ventilation An exhaust inlet is placed just over the edge of the sink at one end. This is the end where the fixer tray usually sits for B&W work, The air inlet for the rom is filtered through a ligt trap built out of a stud cavity with grilles placed high and low on the opposite side of the room. The exhaust duct from the darkroom runs to the inlet of a scavanged heat recovery ventilator that I found in last years spring clean up, and have done minor fix up work on to allow it to go back into service in our house. This exhaust air goes through an air to air heat exchanger that warms incoming air in the winter/cools it in the summer. This allows the exhaust to have its heat/cool energy partially recovered. It also means that I don't risk pulling make up air down the naturally vented gas clothes dryer or gas hot water heater vents to get into gas exhaust product build up. Usually it runs on low speed to generally turn over air in the house, which it needs, since we have insulated and draft sealed extensively since we moved in to the 35 year old house about 11 months ago. The humidistat is set that if wet things are on the go in the darkroom it automatically cuts onto high speed. I have yet to wire the manual high speed contacts to a switch in the darkroom. This would allow me to more easily move to a higher level of ventilation when I am weighing out dry bulk ingredients to mix things up that have less than healthy dusts to be settling on surfaces. I otherwise wear an industrial air filter and goggles, a lab coat and rubber gloves, becuase some chemicals are downright nasty things . Mixing One luxury that I have sprung for is a used $60 magnetically driven plastic coated iron mixing pellet and variable speed type mixing platform. It is so nice to be able to have it attend to mixing while I am carefuly trying to not add concentrated acid to the solution too fast while otherwise being occupried with a mixing paddle. It is also nice to leave it to mix something or a few minutes that is barely soluble. The variable speed means that you can set it to not drive bubbles into the solution, but still mix quickly. Agitation To achieve uniform agitation for processing paper an old uniroller motor base that I have had for years/ saw used at camera store for $10 is used. With it I use Cibachrome II to 10x tube and 20x sleeve from years ago and a second 10x unit sourced for $5 used. I like Ciba tubes, because they drain from opposite end that you fill them, stand up on thier own when draining, are made from all softish plastic that won't crack if dropped, and come apart into pieces that are easy to dry while the other one is on the go is running its 2 minute home brewed one shot dilute blix time when two are in alternate use. To keep the tube from getting cold as it runs, a gooseneck lamp with a 75W reflector spot bulb runs off of the Gralab 300 that I use for process timing. A second lamp gets added when 16x20s are being run. .. Film Processing To process the film I have stainless steel Omega tanks, and Paterson (for B&W, usually). The latest acqusition is a 4 high omega tank with 4-35mm and 2 -120 reels for $50 - again -ebay. I wanted a 4 reel tank, because C-41 developer once mixed as I do it doesn't keep long, so if I can I do all 4 to use up a L at once that is better. Usually I manually agitate the colour in the water bath, but have tried with both lamps and the tank on the uniroller last time to no apparent detriment, I just cut the process time 15% to counter for the continuous agitation. Photo chemistry bulk storage Dry powders are kept in old mason jars, scavenged from spring clean out city wide scavanger before pickup program (also used a larger different set for food storages, canning). Where light sensitive dry materials are to be stored , I cut a black construction paper sleeve and disk to fit inside the jar, and leave chemicals in the zip lock that they came in from the supplier. Alkalines go on the top shelf, developing agents, etc the next shelf down. Wet stock solutions or ready mixer fixer, etc. go into photo plastic bottles that I bought years ago before I got the frugal streak so badly. .. Oxidisable chemicals get a squirt of ' private preserve' wine argon etc gas on top before closing up. It is worth the $20 or so the can costs and the can goes a long way when you look at the price of Colour Developer -4 granules etc. going off from oxidisation, .. Acids are stored under the sink in a recycled drywall mud container that has a tight fitting lid, that even I find a challenge to get off. Balances - I have two A $13 discounted 50g pan balance with balance weights. The discount was achieved thouigh a bulk raw chemical order from fotochem. A $34 old 610g triple beam balance from ebay. Tare is adjusted against the dixie cups that I use for weighting cups by attaching a small length of wire trimmed to the right length to the hole at the end of the balance where normally extra weights are added to take the scale to 2610g capacity. Exposure and control I have a Beseler 23series 2 bought used $300 about 20 years ago.with a Nikor 50mm F4 lens. I use Acetate ciba CC filters; these work OK for me. I am waiting for the right Dichroic price to come along.Other bits: Durst used colour analyser $35 ebay; 4 blade easel 20 years ago gov't surplus auction $20. It sits on a separate anti skid rubber mat -it was sold because the OEM rubber backing had started to roll up under one corner. I bought a mechanical repeating timer one day in college for about $120 when I had to print about 400 potraits for a yearbook in about three days, in addition to labs and wanted to get away with a repeatable 3 second exposure to speed things up. So as you see, I get to the end result for my darkroom and colour darkroom work in a different from a Jobo way, but it is even more satisfying to me than having bought it outright retail or as a ready made solution. I was pining for a Jobo for a long time, but along the way I have home brewed something that seems to do all that the real McCoy can do. Last week I read about how to adapt a Unicolor tube to develop 4x5. I haven't had the need for it yet;,no new enlarger fever unit the kids are in college and I can take over more space in the basement maybe. The TLR 120 is also presently out of service - I am waiting to see that the darkroom and kids time demands can co-exist on just 35mm before moving back into 120 after leaving it idel for about 15 years. Then I will go looking for the enlarging lens that I am missing to do printing from that format on my own. By then a Blad might even be affordable, while the price of 120 by then will be not. As far as consumables go, ebay as usual is a great source. I in the last 2 months have got: 300 sheets 8x10, 75 sheets 11x14 Supra 3, about 75 sheets 8x10 B&W for RA4 process from a retiring wedding photograpgher all for $80. 100 rolls 27 exposure fresh dated agfa C-41 400ASA $230 200' 1 year out of date bulk agfa C-41 100ASA $50 300' tmax 100ASA B&W, 200' tmax 400ASA B&W 2 years out of date, and a second bulk loader for $60 200' plus x 100 ASA fresh dated 150' ilford panF plus 50ASA fresh dated. That has the freezer in the basement with more film and paper related products than food in it by this point in the year. My customised developing speed per Picker of the earlier message in this thread for B&W gives me confidence that I can get good results out of most films that I buy a year or two out of date, and keep in the freezer until I need to fridge them to be ready to shoot. To fill the time while in the darkroom while processing I have a small radio that is tuned to an all classic radio station that I find very relaxing to listen to. I also have a Pentium 166 computer and modest sized monitor good to surf with while processing b&w film, waiting for wash times to finish, etc. The computer I recovered from a number of units that went into the dumpster here at work. I took the ones that looked best, got three spruced up ones going with the dog one parts. I gave one to my mom and dad to replace their 486, put one in the darkroom, and traded the third one to a compter salvage store for the bits that I did not have like memeory SIMMs to make the whole affair come together. The remaining bits went to the dump. Winter is ending, so big darkroom efforts will be scaled back for a time to get ready for this spring's clean out gleaning effort. The next city over has the highest per capita income in the country, and no convenient dump.You are allowed 3 garbage bags a week maximum for curbside pickup. Once a year the big things are put out and gleaning is encouraged to minimise the amount to be trucked away. So, as I alluded to earlier, i scrouge a lot. It takes me about 15 nights of 7-midnight to cover all the different neaighbourhoods.as the pickup time rotates to different areas of the city. But it is worth it. We got back from last years efforts the HRV, a laserjet printer, 4 dressers, 5 bookshelves, a CD player, stereo receiver, vcr, tons of kitchen appliances, a full set of winter boots, sand shoes, dress shoes, rubber boots etc that will fit our your 1 and 4 year old sons until they are at least 8 years old, the list goes on and on. What we did .not need we cleaned/fixed up out ot the other bits found and garage sailed the excess to the tune of $400 one day sale profits. The unfixables just went back to the curb on the next trip of hunting. Summer is for relaxing, tending the yard, going camping on the odd weekend, taking photos all along the way. Late summer and fall is when we gather the summers harvest and put it by for the winter. I make jams and perserves for our own consumption, Last year we put up 160 jars of jam/jelly/marmelade in about 11 different varities. I also made and canned enough scratch soups, pasta sauce base, canned tomoate puree, stews, chili,swiss steak, etc string beans, corn, carrots, peppers canned peachs, pears, apples, applesauce other fruit, etc. I had at least 2 nights a week of dinners plus their left overs looked after for from October to April in the cold celler by the end of October. This years' Mad Cow scare put more good priced beef into our freezer than it could easily could handle. The rest was canned in the different things outlind above. We ate more meat this year than is commonly in our more chicken as a meat source part of our diet. The canned fruit were done in extra light syrup. That way fruit and veg go into the blender to feed our youngest the fruit and veg comonent of his diet, in addition to feeding us. In this manner my canning effirts fulfill my share of preparing and making meals for the family all as a big series of canning sessions. My share of the winter meals preapration means pulling the jars needed out of the cold cellar (and by next year the wine aging down there too) and the occasional cut of meat out of the freezer. The jars and water bath canner needed to do this came mostly out of the gleanings and garage sale shopping. The pressure canner needed to do meat and vegs was found normal $129, marked down to 80, and on a half price of that clearance table one night in a department store. Never in a long time have I been happier to part with $40 as a retail purchase. Extra jam I sell at my office at before Christmas time to raise a bit of extra cash flow for Christmas entertaining. No need for cash for many new kids gifts; yard sailing and spring clean out yields a years worth of gifts that come out of the latched spare room closet ('the secret room' as my four year old calls it) in dribs and drabs thoughout the year on rainy days, etc,. The 'profits' in cash and goods from these frugal efforts are better than if I stayed at work and worked the overtime to buy to furnish and fit out our house, even at garage sale prices in most cases, and to feed our family. I would not be seeing my family as much, and it would also cut into the time in the darkroom. This frugal lifestyle allows our household to function on my sole income while my wife is at home raising our little people and pursuing completion of her university degree. The spare funds accruing from our frugal lifestyle in part allow my photography and darkroom hobby.to continue. The frugal lifestyle also allows my wife to keep signing on for more courses to get to her degree. The darkroom keeps me out of her hair and quiet after the kids are in bed to let her study When she gets feeling too cooped up on the domestic front with kids under foot she re-imerses herself in some form of involvement with differnet community theatre organisations around the city. When she is cast in a play, photography and darkroom mostly can keep me happy around the house while looking after the litle people in the evenings and weekends when she is at reheasersal or on stage or backstage. Community theatre is mostly an all of your time, little money hobby, so it plugs in well with where we are in our life. I have scaled back past techinal theatre involvement since I also have photograpghy, while her passion is theatre, and there are the wee ones to care for too. So all in all darkroom on the cheap, life on the cheap, and our intersts keep out family running smoothly. Mike. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Develper for Delta-100
I get good results with DDX at 1+4 20 deg C 12 minutes four inversions every
minute with four to start when dev added to tank. Works for me but try it yourself on a test roll. regards Malcolm "Frank Pittel" wrote in message ... After many years of using Tmax-100 I'm going to taking a look at using Ilford's Delta-100. My question involves which developer works best with it. I've gone out and bought a bottle of ilfosol-s and a bottle of infotec dd-x. Anyone have any experience with either of these developers with Delta-100? I'm interested in dilutions and temperatures that give you the best results. -- Keep working millions on welfare depend on you ------------------- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Develper for Delta-100
I get nice results using Ilford ID11 1 to1 @ 68 degrees 10.5 min on a Jobo
CPA with a pre rinse. I use water for a stop bath to eliminate pinholes in the emulsion. "Malcolm Smith" wrote in message ... I get good results with DDX at 1+4 20 deg C 12 minutes four inversions every minute with four to start when dev added to tank. Works for me but try it yourself on a test roll. regards Malcolm "Frank Pittel" wrote in message ... After many years of using Tmax-100 I'm going to taking a look at using Ilford's Delta-100. My question involves which developer works best with it. I've gone out and bought a bottle of ilfosol-s and a bottle of infotec dd-x. Anyone have any experience with either of these developers with Delta-100? I'm interested in dilutions and temperatures that give you the best results. -- Keep working millions on welfare depend on you ------------------- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|