If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Creating true B&W prints from Digital
I had the following thoughts on how to create a true B&W print from a
digital image, and was wondering if anyone here had tried it or what your thoughts are on the technique. If someone has tried it and it is hopeless, then I won't fork out the $$ to try it myself. Basically my idea is to invert the image in whatever photo editor software to create a negative image. Print this negative image at the output size on a piece of transparency paper. Then contact print the negative image on B&W paper and process as per normal. I can't see why it wouldn't work, although I don't know how the quality would compare - I wonder how a contact printed 8x10 inkjet negative would compare to a 35mm neg enlarged optically. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Creating true B&W prints from Digital
In article
, Graham Fountain wrote: I had the following thoughts on how to create a true B&W print from a digital image, and was wondering if anyone here had tried it or what your thoughts are on the technique. If someone has tried it and it is hopeless, then I won't fork out the $$ to try it myself. Basically my idea is to invert the image in whatever photo editor software to create a negative image. Print this negative image at the output size on a piece of transparency paper. Then contact print the negative image on B&W paper and process as per normal. I can't see why it wouldn't work, although I don't know how the quality would compare - I wonder how a contact printed 8x10 inkjet negative would compare to a 35mm neg enlarged optically. The paper has too much texture to make a negative, but people have been doing the very same thing you mention for a few years using Pictorico OHT film then contacting the final as a positive. Check out the work and books of Dan Burkholder. -- Reality-Is finding that perfect picture and never looking back. www.gregblankphoto.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Creating true B&W prints from Digital
Graham,
I do this all the time with my classes for making cyanotypes and Van Dyke prints. Much easier and cheaper than using lith film and makes very good detailed prints. I have never tried it as a contact neg for a regular photo paper print. I'll try it. Frank Graham Fountain wrote: I had the following thoughts on how to create a true B&W print from a digital image, and was wondering if anyone here had tried it or what your thoughts are on the technique. If someone has tried it and it is hopeless, then I won't fork out the $$ to try it myself. Basically my idea is to invert the image in whatever photo editor software to create a negative image. Print this negative image at the output size on a piece of transparency paper. Then contact print the negative image on B&W paper and process as per normal. I can't see why it wouldn't work, although I don't know how the quality would compare - I wonder how a contact printed 8x10 inkjet negative would compare to a 35mm neg enlarged optically. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Creating true B&W prints from Digital
Graham Fountain a écrit :
I had the following thoughts on how to create a true B&W print from a digital image, and was wondering if anyone here had tried it or what your thoughts are on the technique. If someone has tried it and it is hopeless, then I won't fork out the $$ to try it myself. Basically my idea is to invert the image in whatever photo editor software to create a negative image. Print this negative image at the output size on a piece of transparency paper. Then contact print the negative image on B&W paper and process as per normal. I can't see why it wouldn't work, although I don't know how the quality would compare - I wonder how a contact printed 8x10 inkjet negative would compare to a 35mm neg enlarged optically. Dan Burkholder (http://www.danburkholder.com/) and Mark Nelson (http://www.precisiondigitalnegatives.com/) are known for using this technique for years. Mark has also a mailing list where adepts discuss this technique: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PDNPrint/ It works very well for alternative techniques but for silver gelatin it seems still somewhat difficult to obtain perfect results. An alternative is to use imagesetter (machines that are used to produce high resolution films for offset printing) output but results vary greatly on the service bureau you can find. I wasn't lucky to find a good one, prices very to high and imagesetters are quickly disappearing in my country being replaced by CTP (computer-to-plate) technology. I'm waiting either that inkjet improves to use digital negatives or that a true digital enlarger for the advanced amateur hits the market. Claudio Bonavolta http://www.bonavolta.ch |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Creating true B&W prints from Digital
Claudio Bonavolta spake thus:
Graham Fountain a écrit : I had the following thoughts on how to create a true B&W print from a digital image, and was wondering if anyone here had tried it or what your thoughts are on the technique. If someone has tried it and it is hopeless, then I won't fork out the $$ to try it myself. Basically my idea is to invert the image in whatever photo editor software to create a negative image. Print this negative image at the output size on a piece of transparency paper. Then contact print the negative image on B&W paper and process as per normal. I can't see why it wouldn't work, although I don't know how the quality would compare - I wonder how a contact printed 8x10 inkjet negative would compare to a 35mm neg enlarged optically. An alternative is to use imagesetter (machines that are used to produce high resolution films for offset printing) output but results vary greatly on the service bureau you can find. I wasn't lucky to find a good one, prices very to high and imagesetters are quickly disappearing in my country being replaced by CTP (computer-to-plate) technology. Just keep in mind that what you'll get from this will *not* be a continuous-tone negative, but a screened one. You can have them set the screen frequency very high (i.e., dot size very small), which will tend towards continuous-tone, but it's still going to be a bunch of dots. (I'm sure you realize this, just pointing this out for others.) -- I think someone should unplug the entire Internet and let us start all over again. This time, make sure that Sergey Brin, Larry Page, Jimmy Wales, and any admins from Wikipedia are not allowed to play, by order of the U.N. Security Council or whatever. - Daniel Brandt, on Wikipedia Review (http://wikipediareview.com) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Creating true B&W prints from Digital
Graham Fountain scribed:
.... how to create a true B&W print from a digital image ... A 'film recorder'. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_recorder Available cheap on ebay. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Creating true B&W prints from Digital
Ray wrote:
I just grayscaled the image and printed on an inkjet. Results are awful. Some of the more expensive cameras have a B&W setting. I'd like somebody post a binary from a camera that has the B&W setting. A good workman never blames his tools. Just like you would produce awful prints in a darkroom without the needed skills, you are getting prints equal to your skill level. If you have the right tools (try the GIMP) and the right printer settings, you can produce decent monchromatic prints. Many cheap inkjet printers print monochromatic photographs better using color inks, as the printers are higher in resolution in color and you can "tweak" the color. The magazine Practical Photography several years ago had a Black and White special issue which included practical tips on using inkjets. Following their advice, I produced what I would call very good prints. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 IL Fax: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838 Visit my 'blog at http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Creating true B&W prints from Digital
Ray wrote:
I just grayscaled the image and printed on an inkjet. Results are awful. Some of the more expensive cameras have a B&W setting. I'd like somebody post a binary from a camera that has the B&W setting. Turning a colour image to B&W by just grayscaling/desaturating normally gives pretty dull results. In photoshop, the channel mixer allows a bit better control, resulting in better control of contrast. A little play with gamma then and you normally have a pretty decent result. I don't think it truly represents what can be done with B&W film, but makes a reasonable substitute. Output of B&W with most inkjets though is pretty bad - most use a mix of black and colour inks which results in your grays becoming muddy, you usually end up with a colour cast (which can often change depending on how light or dark the area is), and black areas end up with an unnatural sheen to them. These limitations of inkjet were what I was hoping to overcome by printing a neg onto transparency, then printing that neg in the darkroom. My reasoning being that inkjets can produce a reasonable range of densities from light to dark, but because they use colours to do it, they look awful. If those densities were then reproduced in a B&W only medium (ie printing on B&W paper), then hopefully the results will be ok. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Creating true B&W prints from Digital
"Ray" wrote in message
newsX2xg.2627$fL3.795@trnddc07... I just grayscaled the image and printed on an inkjet. Results are awful. Some of the more expensive cameras have a B&W setting. I'd like somebody post a binary from a camera that has the B&W setting. B&W setting on any camera is the pits (do you really think that the puny, slow processor and limited software on the camera do a better job than a Pentium-class machine..?) Try this for stirrers and then work out your own technique to convert a "color" digital image to B&W. http://www.escrappers.com/gray.html#pse -- eM eL |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Creating true B&W prints from Digital
"eM eL" wrote
(do you really think that the puny, slow processor and limited software on the camera do a better job than a Pentium-class machine..?) Cough, yes ... the 'processor' in a camera is designed for imaging, can't do much else, but it sure can process images quickly. Now, if what it does and what you want done are different then you have a bit of a problem. Ref.: Lem, Stanislaw; "The Stupidest Machine in the Universe"; _The Cyberaids_. -- Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio Consulting Engineer: Electronics, Photonics, Informatics. Remove blanks to reply: n o lindan at ix . netcom . com f-Stop enlarging timers: http://www.nolindan.com/da/fstop/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Digital Trend Challenging Camera Makers (Newspaper Article) | Jeremy | 35mm Photo Equipment | 25 | April 12th 06 08:49 PM |
Digital Stock /Footage & Clips CDs, updated 24/Jan/2006 | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 8 | February 3rd 06 04:00 AM |
LF+scan+print: Case study, with prints | rafe b | Large Format Photography Equipment | 241 | January 26th 06 05:03 PM |
Ping: Ryadia --Large Digital Prints | Alan Browne | Digital SLR Cameras | 22 | February 22nd 05 04:54 PM |
below $1000 film vs digital | Mike Henley | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 182 | June 25th 04 03:37 AM |