If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Taking photos through diaphanous curtains.
I take time-lapse photos of people. Surreptitiously.
I am disguising the camera behind very thin translucent curtains, and I notice the focus is not affected by this, and the images are sharp. However these are surrounded by a ''foggy mist" and I ask if this 'mist' can be removed by software, given that it is constant. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Taking photos through diaphanous curtains.
On Mar 28, 2017, Peter Jason wrote
(in ): I take time-lapse photos of people. Surreptitiously. That sounds sneaky, creepy, and suspicious, and very voyeuristic. I am disguising the camera behind very thin translucent curtains, Why? What exactly are your subjects engaged in that you have to be so sneaky? What camera/lens combo are you using? and I notice the focus is not affected by this, and the images are sharp. OK! That gives you a starting point. However these are surrounded by a ''foggy mist" and I ask if this 'mist' can be removed by software, given that it is constant. You have effectively placed a texture filter in front of your lens. The only way you might clean up the images is going to be dependant on the photo processing/editing software you are using. Consider making subtle black point, and contrast adjustments. If your software has the tools also look to clarity, and Dehaze, or defog adjustments. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Taking photos through diaphanous curtains.
In article ,
Tony Cooper wrote: On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:00:38 +1100, Peter Jason wrote: I take time-lapse photos of people. Surreptitiously. I am disguising the camera behind very thin translucent curtains, and I notice the focus is not affected by this, and the images are sharp. However these are surrounded by a ''foggy mist" and I ask if this 'mist' can be removed by software, given that it is constant. You are photographing a neighbor in the shower? Does he have knives in his kitchen? -- teleportation kills |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Taking photos through diaphanous curtains.
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:26:41 -0700, Savageduck
wrote: On Mar 28, 2017, Peter Jason wrote (in ): I take time-lapse photos of people. Surreptitiously. That sounds sneaky, creepy, and suspicious, and very voyeuristic. I am disguising the camera behind very thin translucent curtains, Why? What exactly are your subjects engaged in that you have to be so sneaky? What camera/lens combo are you using? and I notice the focus is not affected by this, and the images are sharp. OK! That gives you a starting point. However these are surrounded by a ''foggy mist" and I ask if this 'mist' can be removed by software, given that it is constant. You have effectively placed a texture filter in front of your lens. The only way you might clean up the images is going to be dependant on the photo processing/editing software you are using. Consider making subtle black point, and contrast adjustments. If your software has the tools also look to clarity, and Dehaze, or defog adjustments. Dehazing relies on a color filter. Peter Jason's problem is that his camera is faithfully recording (very much out of focus) the structure of the "very thin transluscent curtains". There is no simple way that he can get rid of it. I can think of some things I would try with multiple exposures and the subtraction of layers. I don't know whether or not they would work. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Taking photos through diaphanous curtains.
On 29/03/2017 08:41, Eric Stevens wrote:
[] Dehazing relies on a color filter. Peter Jason's problem is that his camera is faithfully recording (very much out of focus) the structure of the "very thin transluscent curtains". There is no simple way that he can get rid of it. I can think of some things I would try with multiple exposures and the subtraction of layers. I don't know whether or not they would work. Paint Shop Pro 10 has "clarify", worth a try for overall haze. Or, remove the low spatial frequencies (out of focus) - a free plug-in for Paint Shop Pro, possibly Frequency Separation in Affinity Photo. -- Cheers, David Web: http://www.satsignal.eu |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Taking photos through diaphanous curtains.
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:26:41 -0700, Savageduck
wrote: On Mar 28, 2017, Peter Jason wrote (in ): I take time-lapse photos of people. Surreptitiously. That sounds sneaky, creepy, and suspicious, and very voyeuristic. Yes; isn't it wonderfull? I am disguising the camera behind very thin translucent curtains, Why? Because the subjects act naturally with no camera in sight. What exactly are your subjects engaged in that you have to be so sneaky? They are sitting around sipping coffee and picking each other up. What camera/lens combo are you using? A Olympus E5 with a 600mm telephoto. (2/3rds) and I notice the focus is not affected by this, and the images are sharp. OK! That gives you a starting point. However these are surrounded by a ''foggy mist" and I ask if this 'mist' can be removed by software, given that it is constant. You have effectively placed a texture filter in front of your lens. The only way you might clean up the images is going to be dependant on the photo processing/editing software you are using. Consider making subtle black point, and contrast adjustments. If your software has the tools also look to clarity, and Dehaze, or defog adjustments. I have PShop6 so I'll try when I empty the camera. Note: taking photos from behind glass (such as in a van) messes up the focusing. The "curtain method" does not seem to have this problem. (Though folds and creases in the curtain gives graduations.) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Taking photos through diaphanous curtains.
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 07:50:30 +1100, Peter Jason wrote:
A Olympus E5 with a 600mm telephoto. (2/3rds) 600 mm? Then why do you need to hide the camera? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Taking photos through diaphanous curtains.
On 2017-03-29 20:50:30 +0000, Peter Jason said:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:26:41 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On Mar 28, 2017, Peter Jason wrote (in ): I take time-lapse photos of people. Surreptitiously. That sounds sneaky, creepy, and suspicious, and very voyeuristic. Yes; isn't it wonderfull? I am disguising the camera behind very thin translucent curtains, Why? Because the subjects act naturally with no camera in sight. What exactly are your subjects engaged in that you have to be so sneaky? They are sitting around sipping coffee and picking each other up. That still sounds sneaky. There are other ways to get that type of shot: https://www.dropbox.com/s/2w1jexn420wo36g/DSC_0568-Edit.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/jqmr28hdwz8nfos/DSC_0573-Edit-3.jpg What camera/lens combo are you using? A Olympus E5 with a 600mm telephoto. (2/3rds) OK. and I notice the focus is not affected by this, and the images are sharp. OK! That gives you a starting point. However these are surrounded by a ''foggy mist" and I ask if this 'mist' can be removed by software, given that it is constant. You have effectively placed a texture filter in front of your lens. The only way you might clean up the images is going to be dependant on the photo processing/editing software you are using. Consider making subtle black point, and contrast adjustments. If your software has the tools also look to clarity, and Dehaze, or defog adjustments. I have PShop6 so I'll try when I empty the camera. Note: taking photos from behind glass (such as in a van) messes up the focusing. The "curtain method" does not seem to have this problem. (Though folds and creases in the curtain gives graduations.) There is always manual focus. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Taking photos through diaphanous curtains.
On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:06:33 -0700, Savageduck
wrote: On 2017-03-29 20:50:30 +0000, Peter Jason said: On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:26:41 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On Mar 28, 2017, Peter Jason wrote (in ): I take time-lapse photos of people. Surreptitiously. That sounds sneaky, creepy, and suspicious, and very voyeuristic. Yes; isn't it wonderfull? I am disguising the camera behind very thin translucent curtains, Why? Because the subjects act naturally with no camera in sight. What exactly are your subjects engaged in that you have to be so sneaky? They are sitting around sipping coffee and picking each other up. That still sounds sneaky. There are other ways to get that type of shot: https://www.dropbox.com/s/2w1jexn420wo36g/DSC_0568-Edit.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/jqmr28hdwz8nfos/DSC_0573-Edit-3.jpg Heavens! Were you lurking in the undergrowth? Here's one of mine..... https://postimg.org/image/ih6mhysdv/ from about 50m away. They're at it all weekend! What camera/lens combo are you using? A Olympus E5 with a 600mm telephoto. (2/3rds) OK. and I notice the focus is not affected by this, and the images are sharp. OK! That gives you a starting point. However these are surrounded by a ''foggy mist" and I ask if this 'mist' can be removed by software, given that it is constant. You have effectively placed a texture filter in front of your lens. The only way you might clean up the images is going to be dependant on the photo processing/editing software you are using. Consider making subtle black point, and contrast adjustments. If your software has the tools also look to clarity, and Dehaze, or defog adjustments. I have PShop6 so I'll try when I empty the camera. Note: taking photos from behind glass (such as in a van) messes up the focusing. The "curtain method" does not seem to have this problem. (Though folds and creases in the curtain gives graduations.) There is always manual focus. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Taking photos through diaphanous curtains.
In article ,
Bill W wrote: On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 07:50:30 +1100, Peter Jason wrote: A Olympus E5 with a 600mm telephoto. (2/3rds) 600 mm? Then why do you need to hide the camera? The man is obviously working with some sort of surveillance... -- teleportation kills |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Taking photos at a zoo | Pinaki | 35mm Photo Equipment | 11 | June 19th 07 11:14 AM |
$200 a day taking simple photos | [email protected] | Fine Art, Framing and Display | 1 | October 18th 06 03:29 PM |
$200 a day taking simple photos | [email protected] | General Photography Techniques | 0 | October 16th 06 12:09 PM |
$200 a day taking simple photos | [email protected] | Photographing People | 0 | October 16th 06 12:07 PM |
taking photos while moving | phillean | Digital Photography | 15 | July 31st 04 03:37 AM |