Photographs from facebook

In article , Tony Cooper
wrote:

https://www.facebook.com/tuenz/photo...3741828.712929
502
153892/1172477739532397/?type=3&theater
or http://tinyurl.com/kt37uyl

It insists that I have to create a Facebook account, otherwise it won't
show me the pictures.

no it doesn't.

no facebook account is required.

He said "pictures". Plural.

i know what he said.

The one photo is visible, but to "see more from The Untrained Eye" the
screen says you need to log in or create an account.

nope. it doesn't say that nor is there any requirement to create a
facebook account at all.

However, if you click on the one photo to enlarge, you can arrow to
the other photos.

in other words, no account needed.

you agree yet you argue anyway.

You could have explained this, but you took your normal position and
simply argued without helping.

there's nothing to explain. it works as advertised.

you could have kept quiet and not attacked.

In article , Tony Cooper
wrote:

It insists that I have to create a Facebook account, otherwise it won't
show me the pictures.

no it doesn't.

no facebook account is required.

He said "pictures". Plural.

i know what he said.

The one photo is visible, but to "see more from The Untrained Eye" the
screen says you need to log in or create an account.

nope. it doesn't say that nor is there any requirement to create a
facebook account at all.

However, if you click on the one photo to enlarge, you can arrow to
the other photos.

in other words, no account needed.

you agree yet you argue anyway.

You could have explained this, but you took your normal position and
simply argued without helping.

there's nothing to explain. it works as advertised.

you could have kept quiet and not attacked.

It's not an attack to point out that you are an argumentative prick
who never offers useful replies. It's just a statement of fact.

that's an attack if ever there was one.

You could write: "Click on the image and then arrow to the rest of
the images" and provide something useful to someone for a change. Or,
if you don't want to help anyone, just don't reply at all.

he didn't ask how to view the images. he said a facebook account is
required and it is not.

All you do is haunt this newsgroup for reasons to argue with people
and provide useless information that is of no benefit to anyone.

not only is that flat out false, but it is *you* who is guilty of what
you claim i am doing.

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:26:57 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article , Tony Cooper
wrote:

https://www.facebook.com/tuenz/photo...3741828.712929
502
153892/1172477739532397/?type=3&theater
or http://tinyurl.com/kt37uyl

It insists that I have to create a Facebook account, otherwise it won't
show me the pictures.

no it doesn't.

no facebook account is required.

He said "pictures". Plural.

i know what he said.

The one photo is visible, but to "see more from The Untrained Eye" the
screen says you need to log in or create an account.

nope. it doesn't say that nor is there any requirement to create a
facebook account at all.

However, if you click on the one photo to enlarge, you can arrow to
the other photos.

in other words, no account needed.

you agree yet you argue anyway.

You could have explained this, but you took your normal position and
simply argued without helping.

there's nothing to explain. it works as advertised.

you could have kept quiet and not attacked.

You could hnave added more information than your trademark "no (it
doesn't)".
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:28:58 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article , Tony Cooper
wrote:

It insists that I have to create a Facebook account, otherwise it won't
show me the pictures.

no it doesn't.

no facebook account is required.

He said "pictures". Plural.

i know what he said.

The one photo is visible, but to "see more from The Untrained Eye" the
screen says you need to log in or create an account.

nope. it doesn't say that nor is there any requirement to create a
facebook account at all.

However, if you click on the one photo to enlarge, you can arrow to
the other photos.

in other words, no account needed.

you agree yet you argue anyway.

You could have explained this, but you took your normal position and
simply argued without helping.

there's nothing to explain. it works as advertised.

you could have kept quiet and not attacked.

It's not an attack to point out that you are an argumentative prick
who never offers useful replies. It's just a statement of fact.

that's an attack if ever there was one.

You could write: "Click on the image and then arrow to the rest of
the images" and provide something useful to someone for a change. Or,
if you don't want to help anyone, just don't reply at all.

he didn't ask how to view the images. he said a facebook account is
required and it is not.

Are you so thick that you could not deduce that he needed to know how
to view the images?

All you do is haunt this newsgroup for reasons to argue with people
and provide useless information that is of no benefit to anyone.

not only is that flat out false, but it is *you* who is guilty of what
you claim i am doing.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 23:12:08 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

https://www.facebook.com/tuenz/photo...41828.71292950
2153892/1172477739532397/?type=3&theater
or http://tinyurl.com/kt37uyl

It insists that I have to create a Facebook account, otherwise it won't
show me the pictures.

I'm sorry. I didn't realise that.

it's not true.

Many of the photographs are good but I'm not sure that they are worth
getting a Facebook account. :-(

no need.

THank you for your comprehensive explanation.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:


You could hnave added more information than your trademark "no (it
doesn't)".

he did not ask for more information.

he simply said a facebook account is required, which is false.

In article , Tony Cooper
says...
He said "pictures". Plural.

The one photo is visible, but to "see more from The Untrained Eye" the
screen says you need to log in or create an account.

However, if you click on the one photo to enlarge, you can arrow to
the other photos.

You could have explained this, but you took your normal position and
simply argued without helping.

Yes, I see it now. You can click away the window asking to register. I
didn't think about that because very often Facebook will block any
further browsing unless you set up an account.
--
Alfred Molon

Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/
http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site

On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:05:45 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote:

On Tuesday, 21 March 2017 16:08:11 UTC-4, Eric Stevens wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/tuenz/photo...type=3&theater
or http://tinyurl.com/kt37uyl

... although I think the images tend to have been pushed a little too
much.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Decent images, sharp with good colour. A odd vertical banding in a couple of the shots. Black and white snow-capped mountain the the rain clouds shot. Clever they built a walk-way over the wetland.

That's to protect the wetland.

I kid you not.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens