Video processing for Linux

Somebody may be interested in
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/12...video_editors/
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Eric Stevens:
Somebody may be interested in
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/12...video_editors/

Most certainly. There will always be those who prefer to do things the
hard way.

--
I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that
you will say in your entire life.

usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm

On 1/20/2016 2:25 PM, Davoud wrote:

snip


Most certainly. There will always be those who prefer to do things the
hard way.


Yep! I bring my car in for a warranty repair, the service adviser tells
me: no big deal, all we do is pop out the [] and pop in a new one.

When the repair is out of warranty, we need to analyze, remove, take
apart, replace and reassemble. The part cannot be replaced by itself, we
need the whole assembly......




--
PeterN

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 14:25:00 -0500, Davoud wrote:

Eric Stevens:
Somebody may be interested in
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/12...video_editors/

Most certainly. There will always be those who prefer to do things the
hard way.

It seems that most of the big studios do.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Eric Stevens:
Somebody may be interested in
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/12...video_editors/

Davoud:
Most certainly. There will always be those who prefer to do things the
hard way.

Eric Stevens:
It seems that most of the big studios do.

You're talking about the need for parallel arrays of cheap computers
for video rendering. That's where you find Linux. I'm talking about
human interface. Movies are edited on Mac OS and Windows.

--
I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that
you will say in your entire life.

usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm

In article , PeterN
wrote:

Most certainly. There will always be those who prefer to do things the
hard way.

Yep! I bring my car in for a warranty repair, the service adviser tells
me: no big deal, all we do is pop out the [] and pop in a new one.

When the repair is out of warranty, we need to analyze, remove, take
apart, replace and reassemble. The part cannot be replaced by itself, we
need the whole assembly......

the work is the same either way. the only difference is who pays.

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

Somebody may be interested in
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/12...video_editors/

Most certainly. There will always be those who prefer to do things the
hard way.

It seems that most of the big studios do.

not for editing, they don't.

they use mac/windows apps for editing because that's where the best
video editing software is. nothing on linux comes anywhere close to
apps such as final cut, premiere or avid.

large render jobs can be offloaded to a render farm, which usually (but
not always) runs linux. linux's strength is servers, not user-facing
apps.

On 1/22/2016 3:40 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN
wrote:

Most certainly. There will always be those who prefer to do things the
hard way.

Yep! I bring my car in for a warranty repair, the service adviser tells
me: no big deal, all we do is pop out the [] and pop in a new one.

When the repair is out of warranty, we need to analyze, remove, take
apart, replace and reassemble. The part cannot be replaced by itself, we
need the whole assembly......

the work is the same either way. the only difference is who pays.


Nope. How it's presented.

--
PeterN

In article , PeterN
wrote:

Most certainly. There will always be those who prefer to do things the
hard way.

Yep! I bring my car in for a warranty repair, the service adviser tells
me: no big deal, all we do is pop out the [] and pop in a new one.

When the repair is out of warranty, we need to analyze, remove, take
apart, replace and reassemble. The part cannot be replaced by itself, we
need the whole assembly......

the work is the same either way. the only difference is who pays.


Nope. How it's presented.

nope.

either way, the problem gets fixed and someone pays.

On 1/22/2016 4:20 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN
wrote:

Most certainly. There will always be those who prefer to do things the
hard way.

Yep! I bring my car in for a warranty repair, the service adviser tells
me: no big deal, all we do is pop out the [] and pop in a new one.

When the repair is out of warranty, we need to analyze, remove, take
apart, replace and reassemble. The part cannot be replaced by itself, we
need the whole assembly......

the work is the same either way. the only difference is who pays.


Nope. How it's presented.

nope.

either way, the problem gets fixed and someone pays.


You missed the point completely.

--
PeterN