If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Blur tool
On 1/18/2016 11:29 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Jan 18, 2016, Savageduck wrote (in news.com): On Jan 18, 2016, philo wrote (in article ): Since I generally do a minimum amount of photo-editing this has not come up before, but I now want to blur out a small portion of the background in an otherwise great photo. Using Photoshop, the blur tool does absolutely nothing. What did I miss? I asked my wife who has considerably more Photoshop knowledge than I do and she said it's just for making small adjustments...but I want to considerably blur-out a small area. I know it can be done, so what did I miss? To start with what edition of Photoshop are you working with? What portion of the photo are you trying to blur, background, edges, other? The blur tool is useful to soften edges. From what you are saying it seems there is an area you want to blur considerably, so that is where an adjustment layer and layer mask would work best. 1: In the layers panel duplicate your background layer. 2: From the menu go to Filter-Blur and select an appropriate blur filter type. I would suggest “Gaussian blur” with the radius set between 2-6. 3: Apply that filter to the adjustment layer. It will blur the entire image. 4: Return to the adjustment layers panel and while holding down the alt/option key add a layer mask. This is done by clicking on the layer mask icon at the bottom of the layers panel, to produce a layer mask filled with black. The blurred photo will now appear unblurred. 5: Select a soft edged brush and with the black layer mask active, paint in white over the area where you want the blur effect. To correct, switch back to black and paint in the correction. 6: Now you are either finished or you can adjust opacity of that layer to taste and finish. ...and that might read more complicated than it is. So here is a demo of what I was saying, slightly exaggerated, but just to show how quickly and effectively it can be done. http://adobe.ly/1WnAdO0 Thank you I will eventually get this |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Blur tool
On 1/18/2016 12:37 PM, philo wrote:
On 1/18/2016 10:51 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Jan 18, 2016, philo wrote ment layer and layer mask would work best. 1: In the layers panel duplicate your background layer. 2: From the menu go to Filter-Blur and select an appropriate blur filter type. I would suggest “Gaussian blur” with the radius set between 2-6. 3: Apply that filter to the adjustment layer. It will blur the entire image. 4: Return to the adjustment layers panel and while holding down the alt/option key add a layer mask. This is done by clicking on the layer mask icon at the bottom of the layers panel, to produce a layer mask filled with black. The blurred photo will now appear unblurred. 5: Select a soft edged brush and with the black layer mask active, paint in white over the area where you want the blur effect. To correct, switch back to black and paint in the correction. 6: Now you are either finished or you can adjust opacity of that layer to taste and finish. \ I'm using CS-6 and the blur tool just does not have sufficient power to be of use... will simply have to cut out the portion I need to keep sharp, then blur the background thanks Try the layer mask method Tony and I suggested. The duck's method is a variant that will also work. I would be concerned that with cutting you may not get the result you are looking for. BTW you may need a large number of passes with the brush tool to get what you want. -- PeterN |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Blur tool Figured it out
On 01/18/2016 01:09 PM, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 13:00:09 -0500, PeterN wrote: On 1/18/2016 12:37 PM, philo wrote: On 1/18/2016 10:51 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Jan 18, 2016, philo wrote ment layer and layer mask would work best. 1: In the layers panel duplicate your background layer. 2: From the menu go to Filter-Blur and select an appropriate blur filter type. I would suggest Gaussian blur with the radius set between 2-6. 3: Apply that filter to the adjustment layer. It will blur the entire image. 4: Return to the adjustment layers panel and while holding down the alt/option key add a layer mask. This is done by clicking on the layer mask icon at the bottom of the layers panel, to produce a layer mask filled with black. The blurred photo will now appear unblurred. 5: Select a soft edged brush and with the black layer mask active, paint in white over the area where you want the blur effect. To correct, switch back to black and paint in the correction. 6: Now you are either finished or you can adjust opacity of that layer to taste and finish. \ I'm using CS-6 and the blur tool just does not have sufficient power to be of use... will simply have to cut out the portion I need to keep sharp, then blur the background thanks Try the layer mask method Tony and I suggested. The duck's method is a variant that will also work. I would be concerned that with cutting you may not get the result you are looking for. BTW you may need a large number of passes with the brush tool to get what you want. I have not suggested a layer mask. I've suggested making a selection and blurring the selection. If you blur a selection on a layer, or blur a layer and "cut a hole" in a layer above it, you arrive at the same result. However, the second method seems to me to require more time and effort. Philo has said it's a small area that he wants to blur. Why this would require a layer mask is beyond me. As my granny would say, "It's the long way around the barn". I took a photo I'd previously linked to he https://www.dropbox.com/s/ksnq8cy89b...28-11.jpg?dl=0 and made a selection of the license plate and applied a 2.0 Gaussian blur: https://www.dropbox.com/s/26d5c0402o...8-11B.jpg?dl=0 A very minor procedure. I made the selection a "Smart Filter", by the way. This allows me to change the Gaussian setting without starting over. This is my way, but not the only way and not necessarily what Philo wants to do. It just seems the most simple way to me. Without having to do a layer mask...the blur tool did not do the trick however by going to Filter...blur....field blur I can select the area I want blurry and it works with a minimal of steps |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Blur tool Figured it out
On Jan 18, 2016, philo wrote
(in article ): On 01/18/2016 01:09 PM, Tony Cooper wrote: On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 13:00:09 -0500, wrote: On 1/18/2016 12:37 PM, philo wrote: On 1/18/2016 10:51 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Jan 18, 2016, philo wrote ment layer and layer mask would work best. 1: In the layers panel duplicate your background layer. 2: From the menu go to Filter-Blur and select an appropriate blur filter type. I would suggest “Gaussian blur” with the radius set between 2-6. 3: Apply that filter to the adjustment layer. It will blur the entire image. 4: Return to the adjustment layers panel and while holding down the alt/option key add a layer mask. This is done by clicking on the layer mask icon at the bottom of the layers panel, to produce a layer mask filled with black. The blurred photo will now appear unblurred. 5: Select a soft edged brush and with the black layer mask active, paint in white over the area where you want the blur effect. To correct, switch back to black and paint in the correction. 6: Now you are either finished or you can adjust opacity of that layer to taste and finish. \ I'm using CS-6 and the blur tool just does not have sufficient power to be of use... will simply have to cut out the portion I need to keep sharp, then blur the background thanks Try the layer mask method Tony and I suggested. The duck's method is a variant that will also work. I would be concerned that with cutting you may not get the result you are looking for. BTW you may need a large number of passes with the brush tool to get what you want. I have not suggested a layer mask. I've suggested making a selection and blurring the selection. If you blur a selection on a layer, or blur a layer and "cut a hole" in a layer above it, you arrive at the same result. However, the second method seems to me to require more time and effort. Philo has said it's a small area that he wants to blur. Why this would require a layer mask is beyond me. As my granny would say, "It's the long way around the barn". I took a photo I'd previously linked to he https://www.dropbox.com/s/ksnq8cy89b...28-11.jpg?dl=0 and made a selection of the license plate and applied a 2.0 Gaussian blur: https://www.dropbox.com/s/26d5c0402o...8-11B.jpg?dl=0 A very minor procedure. I made the selection a "Smart Filter", by the way. This allows me to change the Gaussian setting without starting over. This is my way, but not the only way and not necessarily what Philo wants to do. It just seems the most simple way to me. Without having to do a layer mask...the blur tool did not do the trick however by going to Filter...blur....field blur I can select the area I want blurry and it works with a minimal of steps Yup! There is more than one way to go about things. It is good to have a few methods in your bag of tricks, as what works well for one image might not produce good results with another. With Field blur you might find that you have to use multiple control points each with different levels of blur and in some areas have the setting at zero, which masks that portion from blur. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Blur tool Figured it out
On 01/18/2016 04:30 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On J I made the selection a "Smart Filter", by the way. This allows me to change the Gaussian setting without starting over. This is my way, but not the only way and not necessarily what Philo wants to do. It just seems the most simple way to me. Without having to do a layer mask...the blur tool did not do the trick however by going to Filter...blur....field blur I can select the area I want blurry and it works with a minimal of steps Yup! There is more than one way to go about things. It is good to have a few methods in your bag of tricks, as what works well for one image might not produce good results with another. With Field blur you might find that you have to use multiple control points each with different levels of blur and in some areas have the setting at zero, which masks that portion from blur. Yes, I just had to blur out a face in the background. If the person had not had their mouth wide open I could have left it alone. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Blur tool Figured it out
On 1/18/2016 5:19 PM, philo wrote:
On 01/18/2016 01:09 PM, Tony Cooper wrote: On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 13:00:09 -0500, PeterN wrote: On 1/18/2016 12:37 PM, philo wrote: On 1/18/2016 10:51 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Jan 18, 2016, philo wrote ment layer and layer mask would work best. 1: In the layers panel duplicate your background layer. 2: From the menu go to Filter-Blur and select an appropriate blur filter type. I would suggest “Gaussian blur” with the radius set between 2-6. 3: Apply that filter to the adjustment layer. It will blur the entire image. 4: Return to the adjustment layers panel and while holding down the alt/option key add a layer mask. This is done by clicking on the layer mask icon at the bottom of the layers panel, to produce a layer mask filled with black. The blurred photo will now appear unblurred. 5: Select a soft edged brush and with the black layer mask active, paint in white over the area where you want the blur effect. To correct, switch back to black and paint in the correction. 6: Now you are either finished or you can adjust opacity of that layer to taste and finish. \ I'm using CS-6 and the blur tool just does not have sufficient power to be of use... will simply have to cut out the portion I need to keep sharp, then blur the background thanks Try the layer mask method Tony and I suggested. The duck's method is a variant that will also work. I would be concerned that with cutting you may not get the result you are looking for. BTW you may need a large number of passes with the brush tool to get what you want. I have not suggested a layer mask. I've suggested making a selection and blurring the selection. If you blur a selection on a layer, or blur a layer and "cut a hole" in a layer above it, you arrive at the same result. However, the second method seems to me to require more time and effort. Philo has said it's a small area that he wants to blur. Why this would require a layer mask is beyond me. As my granny would say, "It's the long way around the barn". I took a photo I'd previously linked to he https://www.dropbox.com/s/ksnq8cy89b...28-11.jpg?dl=0 and made a selection of the license plate and applied a 2.0 Gaussian blur: https://www.dropbox.com/s/26d5c0402o...8-11B.jpg?dl=0 A very minor procedure. I made the selection a "Smart Filter", by the way. This allows me to change the Gaussian setting without starting over. This is my way, but not the only way and not necessarily what Philo wants to do. It just seems the most simple way to me. Without having to do a layer mask...the blur tool did not do the trick however by going to Filter...blur....field blur I can select the area I want blurry and it works with a minimal of steps Good to hear you got the result you wanted. With PS their are many was to get a wanted result -- PeterN |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Blur tool Figured it out
On 1/18/2016 5:41 PM, philo wrote:
snip Yes, I just had to blur out a face in the background. If the person had not had their mouth wide open I could have left it alone. A lot of problems would be avoided if people kept their mouth shut. VBG -- PeterN |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Blur tool Figured it out
On 01/18/2016 05:05 PM, PeterN wrote:
On 1/18/2016 5:41 PM, philo wrote: snip Yes, I just had to blur out a face in the background. If the person had not had their mouth wide open I could have left it alone. A lot of problems would be avoided if people kept their mouth shut. VBG Of course, had I been paying attention I could have waited... |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Blur tool Figured it out
On 01/18/2016 05:02 PM, PeterN wrote:
On 1/18/2016 5:19 PM, philo wrote: On 01/18/2016 01:09 PM, Tony Cooper wrote: On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 13:00:09 -0500, PeterN wrote: On 1/18/2016 12:37 PM, philo wrote: On 1/18/2016 10:51 AM, Savageduck wrote: On Jan 18, 2016, philo wrote ment layer and layer mask would work best. 1: In the layers panel duplicate your background layer. 2: From the menu go to Filter-Blur and select an appropriate blur filter type. I would suggest “Gaussian blur” with the radius set between 2-6. 3: Apply that filter to the adjustment layer. It will blur the entire image. 4: Return to the adjustment layers panel and while holding down the alt/option key add a layer mask. This is done by clicking on the layer mask icon at the bottom of the layers panel, to produce a layer mask filled with black. The blurred photo will now appear unblurred. 5: Select a soft edged brush and with the black layer mask active, paint in white over the area where you want the blur effect. To correct, switch back to black and paint in the correction. 6: Now you are either finished or you can adjust opacity of that layer to taste and finish. \ I'm using CS-6 and the blur tool just does not have sufficient power to be of use... will simply have to cut out the portion I need to keep sharp, then blur the background thanks Try the layer mask method Tony and I suggested. The duck's method is a variant that will also work. I would be concerned that with cutting you may not get the result you are looking for. BTW you may need a large number of passes with the brush tool to get what you want. I have not suggested a layer mask. I've suggested making a selection and blurring the selection. If you blur a selection on a layer, or blur a layer and "cut a hole" in a layer above it, you arrive at the same result. However, the second method seems to me to require more time and effort. Philo has said it's a small area that he wants to blur. Why this would require a layer mask is beyond me. As my granny would say, "It's the long way around the barn". I took a photo I'd previously linked to he https://www.dropbox.com/s/ksnq8cy89b...28-11.jpg?dl=0 and made a selection of the license plate and applied a 2.0 Gaussian blur: https://www.dropbox.com/s/26d5c0402o...8-11B.jpg?dl=0 A very minor procedure. I made the selection a "Smart Filter", by the way. This allows me to change the Gaussian setting without starting over. This is my way, but not the only way and not necessarily what Philo wants to do. It just seems the most simple way to me. Without having to do a layer mask...the blur tool did not do the trick however by going to Filter...blur....field blur I can select the area I want blurry and it works with a minimal of steps Good to hear you got the result you wanted. With PS their are many was to get a wanted result Took me long enough but now I'll know |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
blur effects | sid[_2_] | Digital Photography | 45 | November 6th 14 08:21 AM |
Modifying A 'Gaussian Blur' Tool Use Question | SneakyP[_3_] | Digital Photography | 39 | April 1st 11 11:48 PM |
Photoshop blur tool Vs expensive lenses | Douglas[_5_] | Digital Photography | 115 | December 29th 07 08:53 AM |
Photoshop blur tool Vs expensive lenses | Douglas[_5_] | 35mm Photo Equipment | 49 | December 26th 07 10:20 PM |
IXUS 500 blur, need help | Xavier Bourguignon | Digital Photography | 1 | July 12th 04 02:26 PM |