If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie SLR Recommendations needed - Please help!
I'm new to SLR cameras and photography but would like to get involved and
soon develop my own pictures and so fourth later on. I am also going to be taking a class soon as well to help but right now I need some help picking out the right SLR camera to buy. I don't want to buy bottom of the line camera but also don't want to buy the top of the line since they can be expensive. I'm looking at spending no more than 500.00 on the body. What I want to be able to do is take pictures at baseball games where I'll need to be able to take multiple pictures quickly to get the right shot of a ball being hit off a bat or in mid air being released from a pitcher. I will also be taking everyday pictures of outdoors wildlife and indoor pics of people. Your help and recommendations are extremely appreciated. Jim |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Getting the ball right off the bat takes skill, and that takes a lot of
time to acquire. No camera will help you with that. In fact, a motor-drive will make it harder, because you'll miss 99% of the time when the ball is being struck. The best bet is to try to get the right moment on a single shot. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I do not want to go digital. I have a digital camera and I prefer 35mm
cameras much more. There is more of an appeal to them than digital beside my father brought me up with 35mm cameras so it's in my blood. Just need to learn more about them. But isn't that always the case.. you take for granted things you could have learned from your parents when they were alive. Again, suggestions for cameras would be highly appreciated! Thanks everyone! Jim wrote in message ... I'm new to SLR cameras and photography but would like to get involved and soon develop my own pictures and so fourth later on. I am also going to be taking a class soon as well to help but right now I need some help picking out the right SLR camera to buy. I don't want to buy bottom of the line camera but also don't want to buy the top of the line since they can be expensive. I'm looking at spending no more than 500.00 on the body. What I want to be able to do is take pictures at baseball games where I'll need to be able to take multiple pictures quickly to get the right shot of a ball being hit off a bat or in mid air being released from a pitcher. I will also be taking everyday pictures of outdoors wildlife and indoor pics of people. Your help and recommendations are extremely appreciated. Jim |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I like Canon, so I can suggest Canon models that fit your description.
The Elan 7eII is a current model, a midrange model, and should be within your price range. It's also fairly small and light, and it is very quiet in operation. However, you might also consider a used EOS 3, a considerably more capable and sophisticated camera, although also larger, heavier, and much louder. It's a very capable camera, if you can't do it with an EOS 3, then you probably should be looking at something other than 35mm I'm a fan of Nikon manual focus cameras...at this time I'm using a Nikon FE, FA and a F3. Having said that, I'd be extremely hard pressed to argue with Lisa. I think that Canon is a wonderful system and the Elan 7e is an extremely capable camera that would readily fill the needs from beginner to very advanced amature. I cannot imagine outgrowing it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I concur w/ Lisa. I shoot baseball (major & minor leagues) w/ a Canon
system (A2e - EOS-3 in Europe) and its been wonderful for me. Lightweight, rugged, quiet, fast and very versatile. Unfortunately the A2es have been discontinued but the Elan 7eII's have taken their place. I have yet to shoot w/ an Elan 7eII but i have heard nothing but praise about them! I sold a couple of them in my days in camera retail and my customers loved them! Also, the lenses that work on the A2e's & Elan 7eII's WILL work on Canon digital (D60's & D10's) if and when you're ready to go that route. Now you mentioned that you're willing to spend upwards of $500 for the body. My question to you is... How much are you willing to spend on your lens(es)? No matter what system you finally decide on it doesnt make sense to spend $450 on a body only to put a $150 lens on it. Consider your optics as much, if not MORE, than your camera body. Good luck and let us know what worked out for you. Happy New Year! Terry |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I concur w/ Lisa. I shoot baseball (major & minor leagues) w/ a Canon
system (A2e - EOS-3 in Europe) and its been wonderful for me. Lightweight, rugged, quiet, fast and very versatile. Unfortunately the A2es have been discontinued but the Elan 7eII's have taken their place. I have yet to shoot w/ an Elan 7eII but i have heard nothing but praise about them! I sold a couple of them in my days in camera retail and my customers loved them! Also, the lenses that work on the A2e's & Elan 7eII's WILL work on Canon digital (D60's & D10's) if and when you're ready to go that route. Now you mentioned that you're willing to spend upwards of $500 for the body. My question to you is... How much are you willing to spend on your lens(es)? No matter what system you finally decide on it doesnt make sense to spend $450 on a body only to put a $150 lens on it. Consider your optics as much, if not MORE, than your camera body. Good luck and let us know what worked out for you. Happy New Year! Terry |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... I do not want to go digital. I have a digital camera and I prefer 35mm cameras much more. There is more of an appeal to them than digital beside my father brought me up with 35mm cameras so it's in my blood. Just need to learn more about them. But isn't that always the case.. you take for granted things you could have learned from your parents when they were alive. Again, suggestions for cameras would be highly appreciated! My personal advice would be to get a good 2nd hand body - that will be cheap and you can have more money left over to spend on glass. I personally think that all 35mm SLR cameras take the same quality photos - the difference is in the lenses that you put on them. The only real difference the body makes is to control how simple your life is. Eg a camera with auto focus and full auto metering is much more convenient than a camera that requires you to manually focus, and manually set your exposure to "match the needle" like the older cameras. However, the photo that both take, assuming same lens, correct focussing and correct metering, will be identical. If you start out with a good, working, cheap 2nd hand body you can spend more money on glass to improve your photos. I think there is a lot to be said for starting out with a full manual camera to teach you skills, rather than relying purely on a full auto camera. For sports shots like what you suggested, you'll want a 300mm (at least) fast lens (F4 will do, you'll be better with F2.8) - these don't come cheap no matter what system you buy into. With any question like this, you will always get the Canon camp and Nikon camp saying why their's are better. My personal preference is the Pentax system - 2nd hand bodies are cheap, 2nd hand glass is cheap and readily available. Unlike Canon and Nikon, Pentax bodies are compatible with both old and new lenses (with the exception of the MZ60/ZX60, but there are workarounds). So far I've focussed on 2nd hand, but there are excellent new bodies and new lenses available too. Pentax had a reputation in the 60's of making the best glass around, and while they may no longer have the reputation, it is still true that their glass is some of the best. And if you should ever decide to go digital (or the way things are shaping up, find you are _forced_ to go digital), the *istD and *istDS are both excellent cameras that are fully compatible with existing film lenses. BTW, to take photos of someone hitting a ball, you don't get it by pointing the camera, holding the shutter down, and throwing away the rest of the shots. This method is a sure recipe for using lots of film and not getting the right photo. I can promise you that if you practice with a couple of rolls of film, learn the delay of your camera, and anticipate the shots, you will end up with many more usable shots from a roll of film than you would get by running the camera on burst mode. Finally, good luck with your plans of developing your own pictures. I now develop all my own film - B&W, Colour Neg & Colour Slide. I find the home developing one of the most rewarding parts of photography. When I open the dev tank at the end of the process, pull out a roll of film and look at my images for the first time, the feeling is nothing short of magical. This for me, is why I won't switch to digital for the majority of my work. I don't care about any of the technical reasons why digital is better, and I don't really care about the expense of film compared to digital - digital cannot give me the rush of excitement as I pull a roll of film out of the spool, so I will not enjoy photography as much with digital. Thanks everyone! Jim wrote in message ... I'm new to SLR cameras and photography but would like to get involved and soon develop my own pictures and so fourth later on. I am also going to be taking a class soon as well to help but right now I need some help picking out the right SLR camera to buy. I don't want to buy bottom of the line camera but also don't want to buy the top of the line since they can be expensive. I'm looking at spending no more than 500.00 on the body. What I want to be able to do is take pictures at baseball games where I'll need to be able to take multiple pictures quickly to get the right shot of a ball being hit off a bat or in mid air being released from a pitcher. I will also be taking everyday pictures of outdoors wildlife and indoor pics of people. Your help and recommendations are extremely appreciated. Jim |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
wrote:
I'm new to SLR cameras and photography but would like to get involved and soon develop my own pictures and so fourth later on. I am also going to be taking a class soon as well to help but right now I need some help picking out the right SLR camera to buy. I recommend to firt finish your class and afterwards think about the correct camera to buy. I don't want to buy bottom of the line camera but also don't want to buy the top of the line since they can be expensive. I'm looking at spending no more than 500.00 on the body. You'll find several good SLR cameras within that range What I want to be able to do is take pictures at baseball games where I'll need to be able to take multiple pictures quickly to get the right shot of a ball being hit off a bat or in mid air being released from a pitcher. I will also be taking everyday pictures of outdoors wildlife and indoor pics of people. This sound like having a fast camera allowing fast shootings. So you need a speedy model together with a lens usable for fast speeds. Your help and recommendations are extremely appreciated. To keep some "compaibility" for the digital future, as long as this future can be proposed now, I remomend a Nikon or Canon model. Both offer a wide range of models and also are prepared for the future with their lens mounts. You should thing about good lens to keep fast shutter times in all light situations (this will be the more expensive part of your shopping) Wolfgang |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Recommendations needed for flat-panel and CRT monitors for photo work? | Mxsmanic | Digital Photography | 70 | November 5th 04 07:53 PM |
El cheapo camera, need recommendations! | Kristen | Digital Photography | 12 | November 1st 04 01:09 AM |
newbie questions about compatibility of digital photo software | Tom Gordon | Digital Photography | 12 | September 22nd 04 10:10 PM |
flatbed scanner for photos: recommendations? | flacco | Other Photographic Equipment | 3 | April 17th 04 08:45 AM |