|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
February 25th 04, 03:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
T MAX Developer
Anyone has been using TMAX developer at 1:9 dilution? What is the result on
TMX and TMY vs recommended dilution of 1:4? Thanks. -- Please remove NOSPAM when replying! -- My Underwater Photo Album: http://www.geocities.com/hmlai88/ Have a nice day and eat as much as you can! =========================================== Lonely Boy http://www.geocities.com/lonelyb ICQ: 1176912 ---- 
|
|
#2
February 25th 04, 04:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
T MAX Developer
"¡¹¡¸Lonely Boy¡¸¡¹" wrote in message
... Anyone has been using TMAX developer at 1:9 dilution? What is the result on TMX and TMY vs recommended dilution of 1:4? Thanks. Try searching the newsgroup archives in google groups
|
|
#3
February 25th 04, 05:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
T MAX Developer
"????Lonely Boy????" wrote:
: Anyone has been using TMAX developer at 1:9 dilution? What is the result on : TMX and TMY vs recommended dilution of 1:4? : Thanks. I've been using Tmax diluted 1:9 for years and love it. It gives good shadow detail, smooth tonality and nearly non-existent grain. -- Keep working millions on welfare depend on you -------------------
|
|
#4
February 26th 04, 02:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
T MAX Developer
Thanks
-- Please remove NOSPAM when replying! -- My Underwater Photo Album: http://www.geocities.com/hmlai88/ Have a nice day and eat as much as you can! =========================================== Lonely Boy http://www.geocities.com/lonelyb ICQ: 1176912 ---- "Frank Pittel" ¦b¶l¥ó ¤¤¼¶¼g... "????Lonely Boy????" wrote: : Anyone has been using TMAX developer at 1:9 dilution? What is the result on : TMX and TMY vs recommended dilution of 1:4? : Thanks. I've been using Tmax diluted 1:9 for years and love it. It gives good shadow detail, smooth tonality and nearly non-existent grain. -- Keep working millions on welfare depend on you -------------------
|
|
#5
February 27th 04, 06:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
T MAX Developer
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:32:09 -0600, Frank Pittel
wrote: : Anyone has been using TMAX developer at 1:9 dilution? What is the result on : TMX and TMY vs recommended dilution of 1:4? : Thanks. I've been using Tmax diluted 1:9 for years and love it. It gives good shadow detail, smooth tonality and nearly non-existent grain. It also appears to be sharper. Regards, John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com Please remove the "_" when replying via email
|
|
#6
February 27th 04, 05:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
T MAX Developer
John wrote:
: On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:32:09 -0600, Frank Pittel : wrote: : : Anyone has been using TMAX developer at 1:9 dilution? What is the result on : : TMX and TMY vs recommended dilution of 1:4? : : : Thanks. : : I've been using Tmax diluted 1:9 for years and love it. It gives good shadow : detail, smooth tonality and nearly non-existent grain. : It also appears to be sharper. I've often why Kodak doesn't simply recommend using Tmax at 1:9. It's a much better developr diluted at 1:9 then at 1:4. -- Keep working millions on welfare depend on you -------------------
|
|
#7
February 28th 04, 08:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
T MAX Developer
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:09:10 -0600, Frank Pittel
wrote: : It also appears to be sharper. I've often why Kodak doesn't simply recommend using Tmax at 1:9. It's a much better developr diluted at 1:9 then at 1:4. Probably has something to do with that 15~21 minute developing time. Not that I minded. Regards, John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com Please remove the "_" when replying via email
|
|
#8
February 28th 04, 02:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
T MAX Developer
Or perhaps because they'd sell a lot less TMAX developer! I have used TMAX
with TMAX 100 and 400 films for a couple of years at 1:9 solution at 75 degrees F with excellent results after having that recommended to me here. "John" wrote in message ... On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:09:10 -0600, Frank Pittel wrote: : It also appears to be sharper. I've often why Kodak doesn't simply recommend using Tmax at 1:9. It's a much better developr diluted at 1:9 then at 1:4. Probably has something to do with that 15~21 minute developing time. Not that I minded. Regards, John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com Please remove the "_" when replying via email
|
|
#9
March 7th 04, 10:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
T MAX Developer
This way (recommended) Kodak sells more than double its product - good
marketing...! I've often why Kodak doesn't simply recommend using Tmax at 1:9. It's a much better developr diluted at 1:9 then at 1:4.
|
|
#10
March 7th 04, 07:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
T MAX Developer
That part makes sense. What doesn't make sense to me is that it's a much
better developer and 1:9 and more people would keep using it after testing resulting in even more sales. I know that I first tried it at 1:4 and didn't like it. It wasn't until someone on the list suggested using it 1:9. Since I had most of a bottle left I tried it and loved the results. I also know that others here on the list have had the same results. Then again I'm not surprised by any of Kodak's marketing mess ups any more. photo wrote: : This way (recommended) Kodak sells more than double its product - good : marketing...! : I've often why Kodak doesn't simply recommend using Tmax at 1:9. It's a : much : better developr diluted at 1:9 then at 1:4. -- Keep working millions on welfare depend on you -------------------
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
