A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » General Photography » In The Darkroom
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Neopan400 in Rodinal 1:100?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 25th 04, 03:17 AM
Michael Scarpitti
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Kokon" wrote in message ...
A Concerned Contributer wrote:
Why don't you shut up and let them ask the question.

The Massive development chart says rated at 200 ISO
the time for 1+100 is 15 minutes 68F....it beats the hell
out of listening to your whining.
http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.html


Thx, I know the times, I'm rather interested in users' impressions:-) From
my experiences, Ilfordpan400 developed in R09 has comparable grain size to
Neopan400 in Microphen 1:1, but the tones and grain pattern are much better.
It is also sharper. I also liked TMY in D-23, but now I have some Neopans to
shoot;-)


In article ,
(Michael Scarpitti) wrote:

I cannot recommend Rodinal and most fast films. Paterson Acutol is
MUCH better, and I use it on Neopan 400 all the time. Dilute 1+14,
develop for 8 minutes @ 20C/68F.

Forget Rodinal. It is an old, old product. Not recommended for modern
films at all.


Yeah, I know;-)

Blazej




Rodinal has a rather high alkalinity and therefore causes considerable
graininess. Its developing agent is not particulary efficient either,
which means there is some speed loss compared to other products.

Acutol and Neopan 400 are just fabulous together!
  #12  
Old August 25th 04, 03:19 AM
Michael Scarpitti
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John wrote in message . ..
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:22:44 +0000 (UTC), Leigh Marrin/KM6JE
wrote:

Sigh... Scarpitti is SO predictable...


That's one word. Try pathetic as well.


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com
Please remove the "_" when replying via email


You don't know me, or my work. Shut up and let me answer the man's question!
  #13  
Old August 25th 04, 03:19 AM
Michael Scarpitti
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John wrote in message . ..
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:22:44 +0000 (UTC), Leigh Marrin/KM6JE
wrote:

Sigh... Scarpitti is SO predictable...


That's one word. Try pathetic as well.


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com
Please remove the "_" when replying via email


You don't know me, or my work. Shut up and let me answer the man's question!
  #14  
Old August 25th 04, 03:30 AM
Udie Lafing
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So some say about Sigfried and Roy but that doesn't mean I want spend
the night in my car with them.


In article ,
(Michael Scarpitti) wrote:

Rodinal has a rather high alkalinity and therefore causes considerable
graininess. Its developing agent is not particulary efficient either,
which means there is some speed loss compared to other products.

Acutol and Neopan 400 are just fabulous together!

--
?
?
?
?
LOL
  #15  
Old August 25th 04, 03:30 AM
Udie Lafing
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So some say about Sigfried and Roy but that doesn't mean I want spend
the night in my car with them.


In article ,
(Michael Scarpitti) wrote:

Rodinal has a rather high alkalinity and therefore causes considerable
graininess. Its developing agent is not particulary efficient either,
which means there is some speed loss compared to other products.

Acutol and Neopan 400 are just fabulous together!

--
?
?
?
?
LOL
  #16  
Old August 25th 04, 03:33 AM
A Concerned Contributer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

He won't answer you he put you in his killfile along
long time ago. Perhaps you belong there.

In article ,
(Michael Scarpitti) wrote:

John wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:22:44 +0000 (UTC), Leigh Marrin/KM6JE
wrote:

Sigh... Scarpitti is SO predictable...


That's one word. Try pathetic as well.


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer -
http://www.darkroompro.com
Please remove the "_" when replying via email


You don't know me, or my work. Shut up and let me answer the man's question!

  #17  
Old August 25th 04, 03:33 AM
A Concerned Contributer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

He won't answer you he put you in his killfile along
long time ago. Perhaps you belong there.

In article ,
(Michael Scarpitti) wrote:

John wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:22:44 +0000 (UTC), Leigh Marrin/KM6JE
wrote:

Sigh... Scarpitti is SO predictable...


That's one word. Try pathetic as well.


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer -
http://www.darkroompro.com
Please remove the "_" when replying via email


You don't know me, or my work. Shut up and let me answer the man's question!

  #18  
Old August 25th 04, 03:37 AM
Gregory Blank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Personally I like Rodinal, its great for film testing because
it like Mike Scarpitti is so predictable. I am sure if he tried
it using 1+100 dilution with say 120 or 4x5 film his mind would
change....and that could be a good thing. A change of mind that is ;-)



In article ,
Frank Pittel wrote:

The only one that I know of that reccomends against using Rodinal is you.


--
LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
  #19  
Old August 25th 04, 03:37 AM
Gregory Blank
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Personally I like Rodinal, its great for film testing because
it like Mike Scarpitti is so predictable. I am sure if he tried
it using 1+100 dilution with say 120 or 4x5 film his mind would
change....and that could be a good thing. A change of mind that is ;-)



In article ,
Frank Pittel wrote:

The only one that I know of that reccomends against using Rodinal is you.


--
LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
  #20  
Old August 25th 04, 07:12 AM
John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 02:33:09 GMT, A Concerned Contributer
wrote:

He won't answer you he put you in his killfile along
long time ago. Perhaps you belong there.


Perhaps ? You are truly a kind person !


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com
Please remove the "_" when replying via email
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rodinal help for new user DG In The Darkroom 8 May 26th 04 11:26 AM
Rodinal Hektor Gonzal In The Darkroom 67 April 7th 04 03:32 PM
Rodinal Alparslan In The Darkroom 14 April 3rd 04 10:23 PM
Rodinal - studional piterengel In The Darkroom 1 March 19th 04 10:05 AM
Suggested development times for 400TX in Rodinal? jjs In The Darkroom 0 January 24th 04 02:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.