If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#251
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban all handguns in America NOW
On Apr 30, 6:36 pm, Gunner wrote:
On 30 Apr 2007 11:53:48 -0700, 9 Trillion Dollar Republican National Debt wrote: Yes you have inferiority issues, no question about that, you very obviously need a gun to make yourself feel important the way you brag about it. = So you need fire extingushers and seat belts to make yourself feel = important? Smoke detectors make you Big Man on the Block eh? No that would no doubt all be you as well, you really do have some twisted thought processes. = Classic transference. Textbook example. I wonder..perhaps a shrink can = get a grant to study you? Perhaps you can shoot your self in the head, that would be much more valuable a contribution to us all, please, go have a gun cleaning accident soon.. = And lets not forget that big big watch....snicker.... or assholes that (like you) laugh at their own jokes because no one else ever does.. = Well..****wits and psychopaths such as yourself dont. Im sure a number = of readers are chuckling as they read your posts and my responses. Yes I am sure they are, at what an asshole you are, how funny I am, and how one dimensional and bewildered you look attempting to debate me with your repetitive, obnoxious, spew. = Laugh laugh laugh yes, we all know you are insane and that you laugh aloud to yourself and at your own jokes, but you did that one already.. now do the one where you splatter your sickly brains on the wall with a hollow point, that would be much more amusing. = Gunner ---- stupid disoriented asshole that posts gun control posts in the rec.photo.digital thread. = rec.photo.digital trimmed by request |
#252
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban all handguns in America NOW
On Apr 30, 7:31 pm, wrote:
On Apr 29, 3:55 am, Bushzilla wrote: On Apr 28, 11:44 am, Bill Funk wrote: On 26 Apr 2007 21:25:02 -0700, Bushzilla wrote: = It is hard for you to understand that all the bans and legislation in the = world will not keep guns out of the hands of those that wish to do harm with = them? Honu Yes it is hard, because less guns in the wrong hands means less dead people, absolutely, and to make that happen we need to give the men in blue and the courts a bigger stick to beat the possessors of illegal weapons with, and that is done through tougher legislation. Stricter laws for who can own a gun help too. If someone is deemed 'mentally unstable' where for example "a Virginia judge in December 2005 deemed Cho "an imminent danger to himself because of mental illness" and ordered outpatient treatment for him, according to court documents.." is this someone we should allow to walk right into a gun stiore and arm themselves? no, of course not. It take just a few smart and needed changes in the gun laws though to prevent the Cho's of the world from such an easy purchase. = Tougher laws have never worked in this regard, and the social = consequences are very bad. = For an example, look at our War on Drugs. Then whatever laws you are referring too were not tough enough, they need to be tougher, particularly in carrying long jail sentences. It's kind of hard to buy illegal weapons or any weapons of any kind for that matter and shoot up a bunch of people when you are sitting in jail. = We're already handing out MULTIPLE life senetnces... even though most = of us are issued only one life. = What do you think of multiple death sentences? Tougher? I'm agreeable to death sentences, the death penalty is needed in my opinion, whatever else it takes too though. I am tired of seeing innocent people that are productive, valuable and intelligent members of our society cut down in the prime of their lives like what happened at VT because the current system failed them. |
#253
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban all handguns in America NOW
Gunner wrote:
On 29 Apr 2007 23:37:18 -0700, 9 Trillion Dollar Republican National Debt wrote: On Apr 29, 1:54 pm, Gunner wrote: On 29 Apr 2007 04:41:32 -0700, 9 Trillion Dollar Republican National Debt wrote: On Apr 29, 6:56 am, Gunner wrote: On 28 Apr 2007 23:55:06 -0700, Bushzilla wrote: = Tougher laws have never worked in this regard, and the social = consequences are very bad. = For an example, look at our War on Drugs. Then whatever laws you are referring too were not tough enough, they need to be tougher, particularly in carrying long jail sentences. It's kind of hard to buy illegal weapons or any weapons of any kind for that matter and shoot up a bunch of people when you are sitting in jail. = We did increase the penalties for drugs. In fact..3 Strikes is involved = and drug crimes continue unabated. only a stupid ass like you would think when you pass new laws suddenly no one will ever commit a crime ever again. = So why do you keep saying new laws will solve things? Because you are so glaringly retarded and everything must be repeated to you a dozen times before you comprehend it, I will state once again that, we will never stop all shootings as you ignorantly suggested, but we certainly could be doing more to curb the violence and reduce the number of incidents, stiffer penalties, especially longer jail sentences will certainly achieve that goal. Do you understand the point yet, moron? Oh I certainly see the fantasy world you live in, but it has little relationship to the real world. Firearms are used to kill two out of every three homicide victims in America.. In the first nationally representative study to examine the relationship between survey measures of household firearm ownership and state level rates of homicide, researchers at the Harvard Injury Control Research Center found that homicide rates among children, and among women and men of all ages, are higher in states where more households have guns. The study appears in the February 2007 issue of Social Science and Medicine. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0111181527.htm -- Ray Fischer |
#254
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban all handguns in America NOW
On 30 Apr 2007 17:11:40 -0700, 9 Trillion Dollar Republican National
Debt wrote: Then whatever laws you are referring too were not tough enough, they need to be tougher, particularly in carrying long jail sentences. It's kind of hard to buy illegal weapons or any weapons of any kind for that matter and shoot up a bunch of people when you are sitting in jail. = We're already handing out MULTIPLE life senetnces... even though most = of us are issued only one life. = What do you think of multiple death sentences? Tougher? I'm agreeable to death sentences, the death penalty is needed in my opinion, whatever else it takes too though. I am tired of seeing innocent people that are productive, valuable and intelligent members of our society cut down in the prime of their lives like what happened at VT because the current system failed them. Yet you insist in keeping those people helpless and under the thumb of the current system. Fascinating. Gunner This Message is guaranteed environmentally friendly Manufactured with 10% post consumer ASCII Meets all EPA regulations for clean air Using only naturally occuring fibers Use the Message with confidance. (Some settling may occure in transit.) (Best if Used before May 13, 2009) |
#255
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban all handguns in America NOW
On 30 Apr 2007 17:07:20 -0700, 9 Trillion Dollar Republican National
Debt wrote: = And lets not forget that big big watch....snicker.... or assholes that (like you) laugh at their own jokes because no one else ever does.. = Well..****wits and psychopaths such as yourself dont. Im sure a number = of readers are chuckling as they read your posts and my responses. Yes I am sure they are, at what an asshole you are, how funny I am, and how one dimensional and bewildered you look attempting to debate me with your repetitive, obnoxious, spew. Based on the time frame of this post and the one in which you said you had better things to do..you have just shown yourself to be a liar as well. Tsk tsk tsk... No wonder nobody believes anything you post. Snicker Gunner This Message is guaranteed environmentally friendly Manufactured with 10% post consumer ASCII Meets all EPA regulations for clean air Using only naturally occuring fibers Use the Message with confidance. (Some settling may occure in transit.) (Best if Used before May 13, 2009) |
#256
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban all handguns in America NOW
On 01 May 2007 05:06:42 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:
Oh I certainly see the fantasy world you live in, but it has little relationship to the real world. Firearms are used to kill two out of every three homicide victims in America.. In the first nationally representative study to examine the relationship between survey measures of household firearm ownership and state level rates of homicide, researchers at the Harvard Injury Control Research Center found that homicide rates among children, and among women and men of all ages, are higher in states where more households have guns. The study appears in the February 2007 issue of Social Science and Medicine. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0111181527.htm Yes. And? Whats your point? Ill bet car accidents are higher among those who own cars too. Same with DUIs. http://www.vdare.com/francis/gun_control.htm "an independent CDC task force reviewed 51 published studies about the effectiveness of eight types of gun-control laws. The laws included bans on specific firearms or ammunition, measures barring felons from buying guns, and mandatory waiting periods and firearm registration. None of the studies was done by the federal government. In every case, a CDC task force found 'insufficient evidence to determine effectiveness.'" Are you going to now point out that people who go into the water are more likely to die by drowning than those who stay out of the water? Gunner This Message is guaranteed environmentally friendly Manufactured with 10% post consumer ASCII Meets all EPA regulations for clean air Using only naturally occuring fibers Use the Message with confidance. (Some settling may occure in transit.) (Best if Used before May 13, 2009) |
#257
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban all handguns in America NOW
Gunner wrote:
On 01 May 2007 05:06:42 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote: Oh I certainly see the fantasy world you live in, but it has little relationship to the real world. Firearms are used to kill two out of every three homicide victims in America.. In the first nationally representative study to examine the relationship between survey measures of household firearm ownership and state level rates of homicide, researchers at the Harvard Injury Control Research Center found that homicide rates among children, and among women and men of all ages, are higher in states where more households have guns. The study appears in the February 2007 issue of Social Science and Medicine. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0111181527.htm Yes. And? Whats your point? Obvious. Guns do not make people safer. The opposite is true. Ill bet car accidents are higher among those who own cars too. Same with DUIs. No, cultist, not just among people who own guns. In states where people have more guns there are more homicides overall. Guns kill people. More guns cause more people to be killed. http://www.vdare.com/francis/gun_control.htm "an independent CDC task force reviewed 51 published studies about the effectiveness of eight types of gun-control laws. The laws included bans on specific firearms or ammunition, measures barring felons from buying guns, and mandatory waiting periods and firearm registration. None of the studies was done by the federal government. In every case, a CDC task force found 'insufficient evidence to determine effectiveness.'" Well, now we have the evidence. I cited it above. -- Ray Fischer |
#259
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban all handguns in America NOW
Too_Many_Tools wrote:
On Apr 28, 12:07 pm, Bill Funk wrote: On 27 Apr 2007 18:59:59 -0700, Too_Many_Tools wrote: On Apr 27, 8:49 pm, strabo wrote: Education_Is_Important wrote: On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:33:30 -0600, Notan notan@ddressthatcanbespammed wrote: Too_Many_Tools wrote: On Apr 18, 11:17 pm, "G.I. Cho" wrote: snipped A ban on weapons isn't the way to go - because there is NO WAY to enforce such a ban. Increasing the number of LAWS won't really work either - because the one's we've already got aren't being enforced either. Basically, we're looking at a Catch-22 = can't win for losing and can't lose for winning! You have reached the first level of enlightenment. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe#1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- A ban on weapons isn't the way to go - because there is NO WAY to enforce such a ban. Increasing the number of LAWS won't really work either - because the one's we've already got aren't being enforced either. Basically, we're looking at a Catch-22 = can't win for losing and can't lose for winning! This is not what I agreed to. An enforcement of the existing laws would reduce the number of guns legally sold. I fixed it for you. This enforcement is not happening and part of the blame falls upon the gun community and the NRA for allowing it to occur. I'm sure you can find cites for that - what I'm not so sure of is their impartiality. It's always easy and comfortable to blame those you don't like. Instead, maybe you could look into *why* such laws are not enforced as you think they should be. Are you perhaps thinkig that the gun community and the NRA file amicus briefs in all cases in which the accused used a gun? Considering the number of gun deaths, too many guns are getting into the wrong hands. Considering he number of deaths caused by alcohol (pools, knives, baseball bats, etc., etc.), too many of these things are getting into the wrong hands. I am recommending psych tests for ALL gun owners including those who want to be first time owners. And, one would presume, voters, drivers, chefs, pool owners, etc.? Cho is an example of an existing gun owner who should have been tested and those test results made available to the authorities. Absolutely. Isn't hindsight wonderful? Who else would you recommend such tests for? Seriously? And why should your opinion on such matters be seriously considered? What are your qualifications for making such decisions? It is reasonable to expect that some current gun owners will fail their psych test and their guns would be confiscated. It is also reasonable to expect that some drivers, if retested, would fail their tests and their licenses be revoked. Do you advocate retesting of all drivers? Have you condsidered the consequences of your opinions should they be put into action? Too bad.... TMT -- THIS IS A SIG LINE; NOT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY! The View on Disney-owned ABC dropped Rosie O'Donnell, even after she agreed to stop talking about George Bush. The president has no leverage over ABC. Disney is not a defense contractor, unless you count the war rationales we buy from Fantasyland.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - This enforcement is not happening and part of the blame falls upon the gun community and the NRA for allowing it to occur. I'm sure you can find cites for that - what I'm not so sure of is their impartiality. It's always easy and comfortable to blame those you don't like. Instead, maybe you could look into *why* such laws are not enforced as you think they should be. Are you perhaps thinkig that the gun community and the NRA file amicus briefs in all cases in which the accused used a gun? I am a gun owner, a NRA member and an American citizen and I am saying that the gun community that I am a member of and the NRA who I am a member of is partially responsible for preventing the enforcement of current gun laws. I am a gun owner, a competition shooter, an American citizen, and a long time member of the NRA. I also say you're nuts. Frankly, IF you are a member of the NRA you would know the NRA has endorsed laws that would keep guns out of the hands of criminals. However, the NRA will not support gun laws that lead to confiscation or prohibit gun ownership by law abiding citizens. There must be thousands upon thousands of Federal, State, and local guns laws that directly affect gun ownership. Against what gun laws has the NRA taken action to prevent their enforcement? It has been an old trick of anti-gunners to either claim they are NRA members and speak out against the NRA or actually become members of the NRA and speak out against the NRA. Which one category do you fall under. Considering the number of gun deaths, too many guns are getting into the wrong hands. Considering he number of deaths caused by alcohol (pools, knives, baseball bats, etc., etc.), too many of these things are getting into the wrong hands. Please stay on subject...and quit making excuses for 32 more gun deaths. It is reasonable to expect that some current gun owners will fail their psych test and their guns would be confiscated. It is also reasonable to expect that some drivers, if retested, would fail their tests and their licenses be revoked. Do you advocate retesting of all drivers? Have you condsidered the consequences of your opinions should they be put into action? Again trying to change the subject. If you take an approved test and fail, you should not have access to the product. Would you fly on an airplane whose pilot flunked his pilot test for insanity? As a gun owner, NRA member and American citizen, I will be happy to be the first to take the psych test....and you can be the next one after me. TMT |
#260
|
|||
|
|||
We need to ban all handguns in America NOW
On Apr 18, 11:17 pm, "G.I. Cho" wrote:
How many more tragedies is it going to take before we wake up? We have a serious gun problem in this country and it's time to take a stand. Let the farmers and hunters keep the rifles and shotguns. Get rid of the pistols and the assault rifles unless you want to go over and fight in Iraq. YOU'RE A GUN-GRABBING GLOBALIST, OR GLOBALIST-SUPPORTING **** FROM HELL! SHUT THE **** UP! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[SI] Owamanga's Ugly America | Owamanga | 35mm Photo Equipment | 18 | March 31st 05 05:08 PM |
[SI] Ugly America comments | Paul Bielec | 35mm Photo Equipment | 92 | March 31st 05 04:54 PM |
Mamiya of America Repair | Matt Clara | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 6 | February 9th 05 03:21 PM |
buy cameras in america | cartera | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 3 | December 11th 04 02:45 AM |
buy a camara in america | cartera | Digital Photography | 0 | December 8th 04 12:21 PM |