|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
August 11th 05, 05:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Canon EOS 1D Mark II N
From the first page of the 5D Spec PDF. What spec do you think it has?
I guess just a minor update like D70 to D70s, possibly won't be full frame. Plot is getting thick. 
|
|
#2
August 11th 05, 06:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
WHO CARES?!!
"l e o" wrote in message nk.net... From the first page of the 5D Spec PDF. What spec do you think it has? I guess just a minor update like D70 to D70s, possibly won't be full frame. Plot is getting thick.
|
|
#3
August 11th 05, 06:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 04:17:33 GMT, l e o wrote:
From the first page of the 5D Spec PDF. What spec do you think it has? I guess just a minor update like D70 to D70s, possibly won't be full frame. Plot is getting thick. Someone got clever and used the "liquify" feature in PS to create it out of a 20D.  -Rich
|
|
#4
August 11th 05, 08:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 04:17:33 +0000, l e o wrote:
From the first page of the 5D Spec PDF. What spec do you think it has? I guess just a minor update like D70 to D70s, possibly won't be full frame. Plot is getting thick. Thick like you. -- Save photography | shoot some film today! email: drop rods and insert surfaces
|
|
#5
August 11th 05, 01:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
l e o wrote:
From the first page of the 5D Spec PDF. What spec do you think it has? I guess just a minor update like D70 to D70s, possibly won't be full frame. Plot is getting thick. Funny, all three Canon bashers have been captured.
|
|
#6
August 11th 05, 01:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:12:15 +0000, l e o wrote:
l e o wrote: From the first page of the 5D Spec PDF. What spec do you think it has? I guess just a minor update like D70 to D70s, possibly won't be full frame. Plot is getting thick. Funny, all three Canon bashers have been captured. Funny as in "ha-ha" funny, or funny as in "queer" funny? I don't bash Canon all that much. Just the lamers who think they have somehow bought into a better line of products when they proudly announce how "superior" Canon is. Fortunately I have extensive experience with both systems, unlike most other protagonists on these forums. -- Save photography | shoot some film today! email: drop rods and insert surfaces
|
|
#7
August 12th 05, 12:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rox-off wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:12:15 +0000, l e o wrote: l e o wrote: From the first page of the 5D Spec PDF. What spec do you think it has? I guess just a minor update like D70 to D70s, possibly won't be full frame. Plot is getting thick. Funny, all three Canon bashers have been captured. Funny as in "ha-ha" funny, or funny as in "queer" funny? I don't bash Canon all that much. Just the lamers who think they have somehow bought into a better line of products when they proudly announce how "superior" Canon is. Fortunately I have extensive experience with both systems, unlike most other protagonists on these forums. At least a civilized person, like me, don't bash Nikon.
|
|
#8
August 12th 05, 12:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The PDF is a HOAX and the mark II N is also a hoax. It is unlikey Canon
would use a KM Trademark "l e o" wrote in message nk.net... Rox-off wrote: On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:12:15 +0000, l e o wrote: l e o wrote: From the first page of the 5D Spec PDF. What spec do you think it has? I guess just a minor update like D70 to D70s, possibly won't be full frame. Plot is getting thick. Funny, all three Canon bashers have been captured. Funny as in "ha-ha" funny, or funny as in "queer" funny? I don't bash Canon all that much. Just the lamers who think they have somehow bought into a better line of products when they proudly announce how "superior" Canon is. Fortunately I have extensive experience with both systems, unlike most other protagonists on these forums. At least a civilized person, like me, don't bash Nikon.
|
|
#9
August 12th 05, 04:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , says...
It is unlikey Canon would use a KM Trademark You can't trademark "5D." Too broad. "EOS 5D" or "Maxxum 5D" are a different matter entirely... -- http://www.pbase.com/bcbaird
|
|
#10
August 12th 05, 04:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Brian Baird" wrote in message
.. . In article , says... It is unlikey Canon would use a KM Trademark You can't trademark "5D." Too broad. "EOS 5D" or "Maxxum 5D" are a different matter entirely... There are at least two trademarks 5D registered on the USPTO, neither is for a camera. Why would Canon then chose to call a camera after a known entry-level product. 5D has been known as long as the 7D (also 9D) Is Canon marketing really that bad? What is happening on August 22, 2005? There will be a Nikon D200 announced sometime this year, but I don't see why they would issue a "full-frame" dSLR and a mk.II N which would presumably be a 1.3X FOV. Somebody is pulling someone's leg on this one.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: Canon T90 + lots of FD lenses | aeiouy | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | January 11th 05 05:14 AM |
| Canon 10d or Nikon D70. | Dmanfish | Digital Photography | 102 | August 18th 04 12:26 PM |
| Canon 300D Mark II Announcement | Skip M | Digital Photography | 3 | July 23rd 04 12:29 AM |
| Canon 1D Mark II starting to ship? | Bill Hilton | Digital Photography | 9 | June 24th 04 04:25 PM |
| FA Canon EOS Bodies and "L" lens & access... | J&C | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 4 | December 21st 03 07:32 PM |
Linear Mode
