Is this true about Canon?

On Jan 31, 11:59 pm, M-M wrote:
Someone else wrote the following and I'm wondering if it is true:

"Canon for some time has been the faster better sports equipment. Not
all just in auto focus but also frames per second and write speed to the
buffer is also faster. Read the features and compare. There are also
many more lenses in the Canon system. Nikon only does as well as it
does because so many photographers had a large number of Nikon lenses as
the photo world began to change. Canon now has over 80% on the
professional market because of chip size and all the great features. If
you ever use a Canon Camera for just a short while you will see what I
am talking about and you would never look back. Nothing wrong with
Nikon of Fuji they are just that other 20% for the most part, and that
does not make them bad. All of the cameras today make great photographs
as long as you set them the right way. As for Canons auto focus system
everything else is second."

"Read about their ring ultrasonic motor for rapid autofocus. Hold a
Nikon in your hands and then a Canon--and compare the rapidity of
autofocus with a long lens (a Canon white lens)--even to Nikon's own
version of the ring ultrasonic motor."
--
m-m


Now if only their ultrasonic motors could fix the Rebel bodies or
correct the optical quality of their WA lenses, or improve their QC so
things like "error 99" become history. But, if someone was shooting
(for e.g.) wildlife, a 1DmkIIn would be about the best choice.