|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
November 7th 16, 09:07 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
Superb in body image stabilization
|
|
#2
November 7th 16, 10:00 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Superb in body image stabilization
On 7/11/2016 8:07 @wiz, Me wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/kAEwAmI.gifv Multi axis, rotational, doesn't flatten batteries. That is AMAZING! Thanks!
|
|
#3
November 7th 16, 10:34 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Superb in body image stabilization
On 11/7/2016 9:07 AM, Me wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/kAEwAmI.gifv Multi axis, rotational, doesn't flatten batteries. ROFL! Some people have too much spare time....
|
|
#4
November 7th 16, 06:06 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Superb in body image stabilization
In article , Me says...
http://i.imgur.com/kAEwAmI.gifv Multi axis, rotational, doesn't flatten batteries. The video looks almost faked. -- Alfred Molon Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
|
|
#5
November 7th 16, 08:18 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Superb in body image stabilization
On 07/11/2016 23:17, Whisky-dave wrote:
On Monday, 7 November 2016 09:07:57 UTC, Me wrote: http://i.imgur.com/kAEwAmI.gifv Multi axis, rotational, doesn't flatten batteries. I think it works with chickens too, although probbaly not at fried chicken outlets. That makes sense, I guess they'd be a bit nervous and extra shaky. Could probably calm them down with a shot of whisky or some diazepam or whatever anxiolitic the American justice system uses to reassure convicts that everything's going to be okay - just before they strap them down and kill them.
|
|
#6
November 8th 16, 01:51 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Superb in body image stabilization
On 11/7/2016 6:06 PM, Alfred Molon wrote:
In article , Me says... http://i.imgur.com/kAEwAmI.gifv Multi axis, rotational, doesn't flatten batteries. The video looks almost faked. I think "Doesn't flatten batteries" is a clue.
|
|
#7
November 8th 16, 04:14 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Superb in body image stabilization
On 11/7/2016 1:06 PM, Alfred Molon wrote:
In article , Me says... http://i.imgur.com/kAEwAmI.gifv Multi axis, rotational, doesn't flatten batteries. The video looks almost faked. It looks to me like additional IS in post-processing used as an effect. I like it! -- best regards, Neil
|
|
#8
November 8th 16, 05:38 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Superb in body image stabilization
In article , newshound wrote: On 11/7/2016 6:06 PM, Alfred Molon wrote: In article , Me says... http://i.imgur.com/kAEwAmI.gifv Multi axis, rotational, doesn't flatten batteries. The video looks almost faked. I think "Doesn't flatten batteries" is a clue. Has since been taken down. Bummer. -- Please reply to: | "Try to imagine a row of computers programmed by pciszek at panix dot com | hippies." Autoreply is disabled | --Ayn Rand, The Anti-Industrial Revolution
|
|
#9
November 12th 16, 12:58 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Superb in body image stabilization
In article , Noons wrote: On 7/11/2016 8:07 @wiz, Me wrote: http://i.imgur.com/kAEwAmI.gifv Multi axis, rotational, doesn't flatten batteries. That is AMAZING! Thanks! Did anyone save a copy of this before it was taken down? I did, but then something happened to it. I would like to have a copy of this GIF if anyone still has it. -- Please reply to: | "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is pciszek at panix dot com | indistinguishable from malice." Autoreply is disabled |
|
|
#10
November 12th 16, 06:25 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
Superb in body image stabilization
On 12/11/2016 13:58, Paul Ciszek wrote:
In article , Noons wrote: On 7/11/2016 8:07 @wiz, Me wrote: http://i.imgur.com/kAEwAmI.gifv Multi axis, rotational, doesn't flatten batteries. That is AMAZING! Thanks! Did anyone save a copy of this before it was taken down? I did, but then something happened to it. I would like to have a copy of this GIF if anyone still has it. Found it posted elsewhe https://gfycat.com/DecimalKlutzyGnatcatcher I think that version is possibly better than the original, the image itself has been stabilised from camera movement.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Image stabilization in body, camera held by lens? | Paul Ciszek | Digital Photography | 7 | June 8th 12 06:02 AM |
| Image stabilization: better in the lens or in the body? | David[_9_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 16 | March 20th 09 10:09 AM |
| Olympus in-body Image Stabilization misrepresentation | Orange[_2_] | Digital Photography | 19 | November 20th 07 04:09 AM |
| Olympus in-body Image Stabilization misrepresentation | Orange[_2_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 28 | November 19th 07 08:18 PM |
| image stabilization | mo | Digital SLR Cameras | 2 | June 17th 05 02:26 PM |
Linear Mode
