Photographer shoots Formula 1 with 104-year-old camera

https://drivetribe.com/p/photographe...TD6l6DWTxZnp9Q
or http://tinyurl.com/ybnx4ohw
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Eric Stevens:
https://drivetribe.com/p/photographe...MfA4SAaKKv18X9
tiXA?iid=ZZO21sIrTD6l6DWTxZnp9Q
or http://tinyurl.com/ybnx4ohw

Blurry, grainy photos with limited dynamic range certainly have a niche
in the artistic spectrum. I'll take camera raw, however.

--
I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that
you will say in your entire life.

usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm

On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 17:22:59 -0400, Davoud wrote:

Eric Stevens:
https://drivetribe.com/p/photographe...MfA4SAaKKv18X9
tiXA?iid=ZZO21sIrTD6l6DWTxZnp9Q
or http://tinyurl.com/ybnx4ohw

Blurry, grainy photos with limited dynamic range certainly have a niche
in the artistic spectrum. I'll take camera raw, however.

No, no, no. Those are "beautifully expressive and timeless images".
Just ask the photographer.

They made my brain hurt.

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:


https://drivetribe.com/p/photographe...MfA4SAaKKv18X9
tiXA?iid=ZZO21sIrTD6l6DWTxZnp9Q
or http://tinyurl.com/ybnx4ohw

composition is good, but the quality is complete utter ****.

On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 17:46:29 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:


https://drivetribe.com/p/photographe...MfA4SAaKKv18X9
tiXA?iid=ZZO21sIrTD6l6DWTxZnp9Q
or http://tinyurl.com/ybnx4ohw

composition is good, but the quality is complete utter ****.

There is something about taking the highest level of racing technology
on the planet, and making phony old-timey photos of that technology
that is just stupid. Art makes me sick sometimes...

On 2017-08-28 21:19:26 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

https://drivetribe.com/p/photographe...TD6l6DWTxZnp9Q
or

http://tinyurl.com/ybnx4ohw

I posted a petapixel link to that storyback in May.
https://petapixel.com/2017/05/13/photographer-shoots-f1-1913-graflex-4x5-view-camera/
--


Regards,

Savageduck

In article , Bill W
wrote:



https://drivetribe.com/p/photographe...1IQMfA4SAaKKv1
8X9
tiXA?iid=ZZO21sIrTD6l6DWTxZnp9Q
or http://tinyurl.com/ybnx4ohw

composition is good, but the quality is complete utter ****.

There is something about taking the highest level of racing technology
on the planet, and making phony old-timey photos of that technology
that is just stupid. Art makes me sick sometimes...

it's called being a hipster.

On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 18:13:13 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article , Bill W
wrote:



https://drivetribe.com/p/photographe...1IQMfA4SAaKKv1
8X9
tiXA?iid=ZZO21sIrTD6l6DWTxZnp9Q
or http://tinyurl.com/ybnx4ohw

composition is good, but the quality is complete utter ****.

There is something about taking the highest level of racing technology
on the planet, and making phony old-timey photos of that technology
that is just stupid. Art makes me sick sometimes...

it's called being a hipster.

****. I always wanted to be one of those. There's no point in even
applying now.

On Aug 28, 2017, Bill W wrote
(in ):

On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 17:46:29 -0400,
wrote:

In , Eric Stevens
wrote:


https://drivetribe.com/p/photographe...1IQMfA4SAaKKv1
8X9
tiXA?iid=ZZO21sIrTD6l6DWTxZnp9Q
or http://tinyurl.com/ybnx4ohw

composition is good, but the quality is complete utter ****.

There is something about taking the highest level of racing technology
on the planet, and making phony old-timey photos of that technology
that is just stupid. Art makes me sick sometimes...

Well, they aren’t phoney. They are just limited by old technology.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:20:15 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On Aug 28, 2017, Bill W wrote
(in ):

On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 17:46:29 -0400,
wrote:

In , Eric Stevens
wrote:


https://drivetribe.com/p/photographe...1IQMfA4SAaKKv1
8X9
tiXA?iid=ZZO21sIrTD6l6DWTxZnp9Q
or http://tinyurl.com/ybnx4ohw

composition is good, but the quality is complete utter ****.

There is something about taking the highest level of racing technology
on the planet, and making phony old-timey photos of that technology
that is just stupid. Art makes me sick sometimes...

Well, they aren’t phoney.

They certainly aren't literally phony. It just seems pretentious. I
don't expect many people to agree on this sort of thing, though.

They are just limited by old technology.

Those very limits are what seem to make these sorts of photos "art" to
many people. I wonder what people thought back in the day when this is
what there was. Those limits certainly didn't suddenly make it art,
but I wonder how many people thought the IQ just sucked, and hoped and
prayed for improvements. Like we still do with so many things.