A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

20D: SO GOOD, IT'S CRIMINAL !



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old February 27th 07, 03:28 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
m II
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 592
Default SO GOOD, IT'S CRIMINAL !

William Graham wrote:
"Annika1980" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 26, 6:44 pm, "William Graham" wrote:
How could you possible know what somebody who lived (perhaps) 2000 years
ago
thought, or what their political philosophy was? The same way you can get
inside G. Bush's head and know what he thinks, I guess

"Biblically documented teachings of Jesus Christ clearly show that
Jesus is a Liberal. His philosophy, based in compassion, equality,
inclusion, forgiveness, tolerance, peace and - most importantly -
love, is 100% Liberal."

http://www.jesusisaliberal.org/

That's all well and good, but there is a lot of discussion among
non-religious historians as to whether he existed at all. I put him in the
same class with Cleopatra......There is very little real evidence that she
existed either, and yet fiction writers like Shakespeare have her bedding
down with the likes of Julius Caesar and Mark Anthony...



http://members.aol.com/dkaplan888/cleo.htm



mike
  #52  
Old February 27th 07, 04:44 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Beach Bum
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 103
Default SO GOOD, IT'S CRIMINAL !

"Annika1980" wrote in message

"Show me," he demands. So he makes me scroll through the entire CF
card showing him the photos to make sure I'm not shooting a picture of
little kids or the bridge ... you know, like terrorists always do.


Last time I was in Chattanooga..

Bridge..
http://marklauter.com/albums/onlocat..._1624.jpg.html

Time before that..

Kids..
http://marklauter.com/albums/fineart...erkid.jpg.html

Maybe I should turn myself in. g

Yeah, I understand how you feel - it's stupid, but then cops are...

But now I just hand over a biz card and ask if they'd like to purchase a
print.

--
Mark

Mostly photography...
http://www.marklauter.com

I was heavily armed and absent minded. You pay a high price for that in
the Army.
- Dom


  #53  
Old February 27th 07, 05:49 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
William Graham
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,361
Default SO GOOD, IT'S CRIMINAL !


"Annika1980" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 26, 8:50 pm, "William Graham" wrote:


Funny. We have had nuclear weapons since the end of WW-II, and haven't
dropped them on anybody.


Extend your timeline one more year and see how it looks.
The fact remains we are the only country to ever use nuclear weapons
on innocent people. And yes, most of those people were innocent just
like the 9/11 victims.


As I said above, why am I not surprised?

The above is preposterous. We developed the atom bomb just in the nick of
time.....Hitler could have developed it, and if he did, we would all (yes,
all) be dead right now, and the whole world would be goose stepping to his
tune. When we developed it, we only had two (It was difficult and very time
consuming to get weapons grade plutonium) So we did the best we could with
those two....We dropped them on two Japanese industrial cities. It worked,
the war ended in a couple of days. We had no idea at the time what the long
term effects of the released radiation would be. Even the physicists who
developed the bomb didn't know, and several of them died from radiation
exposure.....To go back now, and say that we are monsters for building and
dropping those bombs is preposterous, and exhibits the worst of the
Liberal's tendency to Monday morning quarterback.
To our great credit, we have never used nuclear weapons on our enemies
again. We haven't even threatened to use them on anyone. Every conflict we
have been associated with since has been non-nuclear. You guys are like
condemning Nobel for an accident in the first dynamite factory, and ALWAYS
BRING IT UP, no matter what the discussion is about. You seem obsessed with
our giving all the maniacs in the world nuclear weapons just because we have
them, and defend every idiot who wants one in his arsenal......What you
should be doing, were you a reasonable person, is to thank your god that we
are the first ones to get them and realize their potential, instead of one
of these maniacs who would have covered the earth with mushroom clouds.
Did it ever occur to you what the radical Muslims would do with nuclear
bombs? They believe that Allah would take them immediately to heaven if they
wiped out the whole earth with them. they care nothing for life on earth.
They live to die killing infidels for the glory of Allah. there is no way to
reason with these people. They live to die, and that's it. Our only hope is
to make sure that they don't get them. I am doing whatever I can to help
further that. What are you doing besides whining that, "they have as much
right to have them as we do?" They don't have as much right as we do. Any
more than a child has the right to play with dad's pistol. And for the same
reason. You get rights when you can show responsibility. They haven't shown
any, so they don't deserve any. Seems pretty simple to me.


  #54  
Old February 27th 07, 05:56 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
William Graham
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,361
Default SO GOOD, IT'S CRIMINAL !


"m II" wrote in message news:mzNEh.341$IE4.276@edtnps82...
William Graham wrote:
"Annika1980" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 26, 6:44 pm, "William Graham" wrote:
How could you possible know what somebody who lived (perhaps) 2000
years ago
thought, or what their political philosophy was? The same way you can
get
inside G. Bush's head and know what he thinks, I guess
"Biblically documented teachings of Jesus Christ clearly show that
Jesus is a Liberal. His philosophy, based in compassion, equality,
inclusion, forgiveness, tolerance, peace and - most importantly -
love, is 100% Liberal."

http://www.jesusisaliberal.org/

That's all well and good, but there is a lot of discussion among
non-religious historians as to whether he existed at all. I put him in
the same class with Cleopatra......There is very little real evidence
that she existed either, and yet fiction writers like Shakespeare have
her bedding down with the likes of Julius Caesar and Mark Anthony...


http://members.aol.com/dkaplan888/cleo.htm

Yes. The stories go on and on, but where is the justification for those
stories? What is the actual evidence for them? - Quoting Shakespeare doesn't
count. I have found that much of ancient history is pure speculation on the
part of historians who are working for their PhD's in ancient
history....When you try to find the actual evidence for that speculation,
you'll find that it doesn't exist.......


  #55  
Old February 27th 07, 06:01 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
MarkČ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,185
Default SO GOOD, IT'S CRIMINAL !

William Graham wrote:
"m II" wrote in message
news:mzNEh.341$IE4.276@edtnps82...
William Graham wrote:
"Annika1980" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 26, 6:44 pm, "William Graham" wrote:
How could you possible know what somebody who lived (perhaps) 2000
years ago
thought, or what their political philosophy was? The same way you
can get
inside G. Bush's head and know what he thinks, I guess
"Biblically documented teachings of Jesus Christ clearly show that
Jesus is a Liberal. His philosophy, based in compassion, equality,
inclusion, forgiveness, tolerance, peace and - most importantly -
love, is 100% Liberal."

http://www.jesusisaliberal.org/

That's all well and good, but there is a lot of discussion among
non-religious historians as to whether he existed at all. I put him
in the same class with Cleopatra......There is very little real
evidence that she existed either, and yet fiction writers like
Shakespeare have her bedding down with the likes of Julius Caesar
and Mark Anthony...


http://members.aol.com/dkaplan888/cleo.htm

Yes. The stories go on and on, but where is the justification for
those stories? What is the actual evidence for them? - Quoting
Shakespeare doesn't count. I have found that much of ancient history
is pure speculation on the part of historians who are working for
their PhD's in ancient history....When you try to find the actual
evidence for that speculation, you'll find that it doesn't
exist.......


I know there was a Cleopatra! Didn't you see the movie??
How could whats-her-fat-face play her so well if she didn't exist?
Sheesh.


--
Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by MarkČ at:
www.pbase.com/markuson


  #56  
Old February 27th 07, 06:03 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
William Graham
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,361
Default SO GOOD, IT'S CRIMINAL !


"m II" wrote in message news:maNEh.49$ka5.10@edtnps90...
William Graham wrote:

I never said that there weren't different degrees of Socialism.....It has
a way of starting small, and growing and growing....."Creeping"
Socialism, it's called.....I have watched it creeping and growing bigger
and bigger in this country all of my life, and watched my freedoms become
abridged by it, too. It's funny, but you can measure its progress very
well, simply by reading the tax tables.....The greater the percentage of
your salary you pay in taxes, the greater the percentage of socialism,
and the fewer freedoms you have.


By your definition, the present government in the US must be the most
socialist on earth.

http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/

Clicking 'reload' refreshes the amount of national debt. How do you think
it will be paid? The Communist Chinese will not go over the two billion a
DAY they now give to keep the US afloat.

Well, I said the tax tables, not the money spent or borrowed, but in general
yes....We are fast becoming the most socialized country on earth. It has
crept up on us, and by now, it has us by the throat. Everyone wants the
government to take care of them. To not have to worry about anything. They
don't realize that that means giving up their freedoms, too. So they all
vote for whoever says that he will make the government give them something
for free. Not just two chickens in every pot, but two chickens bought and
paid for by Uncle Sam. IOW, steal from the rich to buy the chickens for the
poor.....


  #57  
Old February 27th 07, 12:57 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Joseph Kewfi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 228
Default SO GOOD, IT'S CRIMINAL !

I am only afraid of real threats.....9/11 was a real attack, and real,
innocent people were killed.


O get a grip man, Sept 11th was a single incident. 3,000 innocent people a
month are being killed in Iraq in good part due to your "hawks" occupation.
You are really clueless.

"William Graham" wrote in message
. ..

"Annika1980" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 26, 3:32 pm, "William Graham" wrote:

All I can do at this point
is to try to survive, and I do that by trying to prevent things like
9/11
from happening again, and voting for the biggest "hawks" I can find and
telling them to arm us to the teeth.....Do you have any better
suggestions
for me?



I have two suggestions:
1. Get a ****in clue.
2. Quit living in fear.



I am only afraid of real threats.....9/11 was a real attack, and real,
innocent people were killed. There have been no more attacks on this
country since, so whatever our government has been doing to prevent them,
it has worked.
I do not live in personal fear, but I fear for the future of my country
and its citizens. This is a perfectly rational fear, and not a phobia. I
want Bush, and/or whatever government we have in the future, to keep all
the "action" away from American soil, and to keep nuclear weapons out of
the hands of idiots like the people who run Iran and North Korea. This is
not the desires of a, "clueless person." These are perfectly reasonable
things to hope for.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 5169 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try SPAMfighter for free now!


  #58  
Old February 27th 07, 03:58 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Annika1980
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,898
Default SO GOOD, IT'S CRIMINAL !

On Feb 27, 1:01 am, "MarkČ" mjmorgan(lowest even number
wrote:

I know there was a Cleopatra! Didn't you see the movie??
How could whats-her-fat-face play her so well if she didn't exist?
Sheesh.


William believes in nothing. Yet he claims to know all about how
liberals think.
How many other newsgroups can claim both a Holocaust denier and a
Cleopatra denier among it's regular posters? Not to mention a few
Canon deniers.


  #59  
Old February 27th 07, 04:04 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
MarkČ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,185
Default SO GOOD, IT'S CRIMINAL !

Annika1980 wrote:
On Feb 27, 1:01 am, "MarkČ" mjmorgan(lowest even number
wrote:

I know there was a Cleopatra! Didn't you see the movie??
How could whats-her-fat-face play her so well if she didn't exist?
Sheesh.


William believes in nothing. Yet he claims to know all about how
liberals think.
How many other newsgroups can claim both a Holocaust denier and a
Cleopatra denier among it's regular posters? Not to mention a few
Canon deniers.


Ya, but I was only kidding...

--
Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by MarkČ at:
www.pbase.com/markuson


  #60  
Old February 27th 07, 04:09 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Annika1980
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,898
Default SO GOOD, IT'S CRIMINAL !

On Feb 26, 10:12 pm, "William Graham" wrote:

the monster I am worried about is radical religious groups


Let's leave the Baptists and the Evangelicals out of this!


who would gladly die just to kill me....And what have I ever done to them?


You are trying to judge an entire religion by the actions of a few
fundamentalist whackos. That's wrong, whether you are talking about
Muslims or Pat Robertson.


Neither I nor my ancesters have ever owned a slave, yet my kids have to
surffer for their kids.


How have your kids suffered?


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
20D: SO GOOD IT'S CRIMINAL ! Annika1980 Digital Photography 411 March 7th 07 06:02 AM
Ebay Betrueger Criminal Ebayseller Preferred Photography Book Edition General Equipment For Sale 0 July 3rd 04 01:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.