Apple invents concert picture video footage killer

In article ,
RichA wrote:

Too bad, cellphone addicts.

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36672001

in other words, you're happy about something apple is doing.

not that this will ever make it into a product.

In article ,
RichA wrote:

Too bad, cellphone addicts.

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36672001

in other words, you're happy about something apple is doing.

not that this will ever make it into a product.

True, some scumbag will sue Apple, claiming the cellphone was necessary for their LIFE!!

lots of scumbags sue apple. that doesn't mean they will win.

just look at the moron who claims he invented the iphone in 1992 and
sued for $10b despite not having a valid claim.

On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:03:27 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article ,
RichA wrote:

Too bad, cellphone addicts.

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36672001

in other words, you're happy about something apple is doing.

not that this will ever make it into a product.

True, some scumbag will sue Apple, claiming the cellphone was necessary for their LIFE!!

lots of scumbags sue apple. that doesn't mean they will win.

just look at the moron who claims he invented the iphone in 1992 and
sued for $10b despite not having a valid claim.

You don't need a valid claim, just a flake judge.

In article , Bill W
wrote:

Too bad, cellphone addicts.

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36672001

in other words, you're happy about something apple is doing.

not that this will ever make it into a product.

True, some scumbag will sue Apple, claiming the cellphone was necessary
for their LIFE!!

lots of scumbags sue apple. that doesn't mean they will win.

just look at the moron who claims he invented the iphone in 1992 and
sued for $10b despite not having a valid claim.

You don't need a valid claim, just a flake judge.

actually, flake lawyers.

the basis of this lawsuit is a 1992 patent that was *abandoned* in 1995
for failure to pay the required fees.

On 6/30/2016 10:31 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , Bill W
wrote:

Too bad, cellphone addicts.

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36672001

in other words, you're happy about something apple is doing.

not that this will ever make it into a product.

True, some scumbag will sue Apple, claiming the cellphone was necessary
for their LIFE!!

lots of scumbags sue apple. that doesn't mean they will win.

just look at the moron who claims he invented the iphone in 1992 and
sued for $10b despite not having a valid claim.

You don't need a valid claim, just a flake judge.

actually, flake lawyers.

the basis of this lawsuit is a 1992 patent that was *abandoned* in 1995
for failure to pay the required fees.


Even if it had not been abandoned, in a lot of intangible property
litigation cases, the party with the deepest pockets win, not always on
the merits.


--
PeterN

In article , PeterN
wrote:


True, some scumbag will sue Apple, claiming the cellphone was necessary
for their LIFE!!

lots of scumbags sue apple. that doesn't mean they will win.

just look at the moron who claims he invented the iphone in 1992 and
sued for $10b despite not having a valid claim.

You don't need a valid claim, just a flake judge.

actually, flake lawyers.

the basis of this lawsuit is a 1992 patent that was *abandoned* in 1995
for failure to pay the required fees.

Even if it had not been abandoned, in a lot of intangible property
litigation cases, the party with the deepest pockets win, not always on
the merits.

that's normally the case and yet another reason why he'll lose,
although not the main reason.

On 6/30/2016 10:21 PM, Bill W wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:03:27 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article ,
RichA wrote:

Too bad, cellphone addicts.

http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-36672001

in other words, you're happy about something apple is doing.

not that this will ever make it into a product.

True, some scumbag will sue Apple, claiming the cellphone was necessary for their LIFE!!

lots of scumbags sue apple. that doesn't mean they will win.

just look at the moron who claims he invented the iphone in 1992 and
sued for $10b despite not having a valid claim.

You don't need a valid claim, just a flake judge.


Or, a lot of money.

--
PeterN

On 7/1/2016 4:51 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN
wrote:


True, some scumbag will sue Apple, claiming the cellphone was necessary
for their LIFE!!

lots of scumbags sue apple. that doesn't mean they will win.

just look at the moron who claims he invented the iphone in 1992 and
sued for $10b despite not having a valid claim.

You don't need a valid claim, just a flake judge.

actually, flake lawyers.

the basis of this lawsuit is a 1992 patent that was *abandoned* in 1995
for failure to pay the required fees.

Even if it had not been abandoned, in a lot of intangible property
litigation cases, the party with the deepest pockets win, not always on
the merits.

that's normally the case and yet another reason why he'll lose,
although not the main reason.


OMG, Are you feeling sick? You actually agree with me, and have done so
for several days. Better get a complete medical exam.

--
PeterN