If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Oh God! WHY did they shrink the D80 from D70 dimensions??!
The size of a D50??? Why? Do they anticipate more women than men
buying it? Why on EARTH would anyone want it that small? This is classed as an above entry level camera so what is with with the P&S size reasoning? Big mistake, IMO. The D70 is a MUCH more handle-friendly camera than the D50. from dpreview: Body & Design Sticking with what people find familiar (and works) the D80 pretty much follows the design of the D70/D70s, albeit with a few tweaks, mostly softening of lines, with a more rounded top and molding around the shutter release. Dimensionally however the D80 is quite a bit smaller, virtually the same size as the D50. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Oh God! WHY did they shrink the D80 from D70 dimensions??!
RichA wrote:
The size of a D50??? Why? Do they anticipate more women than men buying it? Oh God! WHY does RichA care??! He'll never own a DSLR!!! Greg -- "All my time I spent in heaven Revelries of dance and wine Waking to the sound of laughter Up I'd rise and kiss the sky" - The Mekons |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Oh God! WHY did they shrink the D80 from D70 dimensions??!
One of the two points about the D80 that have prevented me rushing out to
'upgrade' from the D70, is the size reduction - I have big hands. Secondly, why adopt sd cards for storage, compact flash is easier to handle and more durable. "RichA" wrote in message ups.com... The size of a D50??? Why? Do they anticipate more women than men buying it? Why on EARTH would anyone want it that small? This is classed as an above entry level camera so what is with with the P&S size reasoning? Big mistake, IMO. The D70 is a MUCH more handle-friendly camera than the D50. from dpreview: Body & Design Sticking with what people find familiar (and works) the D80 pretty much follows the design of the D70/D70s, albeit with a few tweaks, mostly softening of lines, with a more rounded top and molding around the shutter release. Dimensionally however the D80 is quite a bit smaller, virtually the same size as the D50. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Oh God! WHY did they shrink the D80 from D70 dimensions??!
Nigel Cummings wrote:
One of the two points about the D80 that have prevented me rushing out to 'upgrade' from the D70, is the size reduction - I have big hands. Were I buying a DSLR, I would probably look for a more compact size. After all, the sensor is only 2/3 the size of a 35mm frame, so it would nice if everything else were 2/3 the size (where possible). Have you actually tried holding a D80? Secondly, why adopt sd cards for storage, compact flash is easier to handle and more durable. What evidence is there that CF is more durable, especially if you include the fragile multi-pin connector? I suspect that SD now provides compatibility with a greater number and range of devices. In any case, you would be buying new memory for your new camera, wouldn't you, and selling off the old? David |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Oh God! WHY did they shrink the D80 from D70 dimensions??!
"Nigel Cummings" wrote in message
k... One of the two points about the D80 that have prevented me rushing out to 'upgrade' from the D70, is the size reduction - I have big hands. Secondly, why adopt sd cards for storage, compact flash is easier to handle and more durable. I don't see how CF is any more durable than SD. Isn't there a controller of some type in a CF card? An SD is a simple flash memory card, seems to be very durable to me. I've had no problems with either. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Oh God! WHY did they shrink the D80 from D70 dimensions??!
According to David J Taylor :
Nigel Cummings wrote: [ ... ] Secondly, why adopt sd cards for storage, compact flash is easier to handle and more durable. What evidence is there that CF is more durable, especially if you include the fragile multi-pin connector? The CF card (with its female connector) should well be more durable. What may not be so is the male connector in the camera, if someone is not sufficiently careful in inserting it. There are sufficient clues as to the proper orientation so it *should* not be a problem to anyone who uses it and pays *any* attention to the markings adjacent to the camera's slot (at least based on the Nikon D70) and the tactile cues on the CF card itself. The *only* time that I have put a CF card in wrong was when I was experimenting to see what was possible. You can't push it in all the way with the card wrong side to -- the guides prevent that. You can't push it in at all with the connector edge out. You *can* push it too far with a side edge first -- but that feels so wrong that I find it difficult to imagine *anyone* pushing it in far enough to damage the pins in the camera's socket. I suspect that SD now provides compatibility with a greater number and range of devices. "Devices"? You mean cameras -- or card readers? I find the CF easier to deal with on my older Sun computers, which do not offer USB interfaces at all. The newer ones do offer them, but I am not using one as my current deskside computer at present. In any case, you would be buying new memory for your new camera, wouldn't you, and selling off the old? Well ... this would rather *force* him into buying new memory for the D80, even if he had a D70 and wished to continue to use it as well. When I finally get a D200, I do not expect to sell my D70, nor do I expect to get rid of my current CF cards. The 4GB one will certainly work well in the D200, and the 1GB ones will be good for short shoots at least. (As for the ancient CF cards which I have, 48 MB, 16MB, and even one 8MB -- they would hardly sell for enough to make them worth selling -- and I do use them occasionally to move files between two computers one of which doesn't happen to be currently networked. They hold a lot more than a floppy, and I already have them, so why get rid of them? And the SD cards seem to be too small and too light -- easy for one to blow away if set down outdoors, or to have it slip out of my fingers and perhaps become lost in leaves and other ground debris. Enjoy, DoN. -- Email: | Voice (all times): (703) 938-4564 (too) near Washington D.C. | http://www.d-and-d.com/dnichols/DoN.html --- Black Holes are where God is dividing by zero --- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Oh God! WHY did they shrink the D80 from D70 dimensions??!
DoN. Nichols wrote:
[] And the SD cards seem to be too small and too light -- easy for one to blow away if set down outdoors, or to have it slip out of my fingers and perhaps become lost in leaves and other ground debris. Enjoy, DoN. I must confess that, while this has never happened to me, I can see that the cards may be too small for some people. At least with the Nikon range you now have a choice. Cheers, David |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Oh God! WHY did they shrink the D80 from D70 dimensions??!
Why are you asking GOD? Did He reply?
"RichA" wrote in message ups.com... The size of a D50??? Why? Do they anticipate more women than men buying it? Why on EARTH would anyone want it that small? This is classed as an above entry level camera so what is with with the P&S size reasoning? Big mistake, IMO. The D70 is a MUCH more handle-friendly camera than the D50. from dpreview: Body & Design Sticking with what people find familiar (and works) the D80 pretty much follows the design of the D70/D70s, albeit with a few tweaks, mostly softening of lines, with a more rounded top and molding around the shutter release. Dimensionally however the D80 is quite a bit smaller, virtually the same size as the D50. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Oh God! WHY did they shrink the D80 from D70 dimensions??!
"David J Taylor" wrote in message . uk... Nigel Cummings wrote: One of the two points about the D80 that have prevented me rushing out to 'upgrade' from the D70, is the size reduction - I have big hands. Were I buying a DSLR, I would probably look for a more compact size. After all, the sensor is only 2/3 the size of a 35mm frame, so it would nice if everything else were 2/3 the size (where possible). Have you actually tried holding a D80? Secondly, why adopt sd cards for storage, compact flash is easier to handle and more durable. What evidence is there that CF is more durable, especially if you include the fragile multi-pin connector? I suspect that SD now provides compatibility with a greater number and range of devices. In any case, you would be buying new memory for your new camera, wouldn't you, and selling off the old? David I saw a test of different cards, and CF seems to win out when it comes to durability. Everything from heat to cold to running the things through a washing machine to driving a car over them. I will admit the pins look a little fragile, but I've never heard of anyone having a problem with them. I suspect the same thing you do, that they are trying to make SD the new standard. Plus, it gives the designers more room inside the camera to either add stuff or make the camera smaller. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Oh God! WHY did they shrink the D80 from D70 dimensions??!
In article . com,
"RichA" wrote: The size of a D50??? Why? Do they anticipate more women than men buying it? Why on EARTH would anyone want it that small? This is classed as an above entry level camera so what is with with the P&S size reasoning? Big mistake, IMO. The D70 is a MUCH more handle-friendly camera than the D50. from dpreview: Body & Design Sticking with what people find familiar (and works) the D80 pretty much follows the design of the D70/D70s, albeit with a few tweaks, mostly softening of lines, with a more rounded top and molding around the shutter release. Dimensionally however the D80 is quite a bit smaller, virtually the same size as the D50. Another bigger issue is the the change rom CF to sd (Suc D) cards fumble those with big man fingers !!!! Won't be buying the D80. -- Reality-Is finding that perfect picture and never looking back. www.gregblankphoto.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which freeware does the three most basic editing tasks (shrink, text, redeye)? | lord derfel cadarn | Digital Photography | 0 | February 14th 06 05:01 PM |
Which freeware does the three most basic editing tasks (shrink, text, redeye)? | Gordon reeder | Digital Photography | 0 | February 13th 06 11:06 PM |
Which freeware does the three most basic editing tasks (shrink, text, redeye)? | Bob Ward | Digital Photography | 2 | February 13th 06 04:40 PM |
Which freeware does the three most basic editing tasks (shrink, text, redeye)? | Shawn Hirn | Digital Photography | 0 | February 13th 06 02:24 PM |
Which freeware does the three most basic editing tasks (shrink, text, redeye)? | Ron May | Digital Photography | 0 | February 13th 06 03:40 AM |