Nikon or Canon (noise)

DD wrote:
In article , ozcvgtt02
DD wrote:

so to compensate for this Canon deploy an aggressive noise-
reduction algorithm in-camera to give the illusion that the higher ISO
output is less noisy.

Show the test pictures (of respectable websites) ...
Do you claim that also be true for RAW?

Or is that a case of "since CMOS *must* be worse, Canon *must*
use aggressive noise reduction, QED, don't disturb me with tests"?

[...]

With Nikon DSLRs that use the CCD technology the noise is more apparent
because there is less in-camera noise reduction being done.

[...]

Lemme guess...you're a Canon user, right?

Answer me this: Does the truth of my and your statements depend
on me being a Contax user, Nikon user, or maybe a Casio user?

If yes, I rest my case,
If no, I quiver in expectancy to read your answer (and do include
these test pictures showing 'aggressive noise-reduction
algorithms'!)

-Wolfgang