[Meta] POLL: Who here would support a moderated version of rec.photo.digital?

LOL

"Steve Wilbur" wrote in message
...
Not me - we have enough problem with the govt censoring people. We
don't need petty tyrants on USENET to help out.

On 30 Jun 2004 04:31:22 -0700, (Jorge Prediguez)
wrote:

Lionel wrote in message . ..
Serious question:
Suppose that I were to propose the creation of
rec.photo.digital.moderated?

The basic idea I'm thinking of is for RPDM to be a 'cleaned up' version
of RPD, with posts to RPDM being automatically xposted to RPD to make it
possible for RPD readers help digital newbies, & easier for others to
upgrade to the moderated group.

If I post to one group I'm going to complain if some one is cross
posting my posts to another group be it manually or by a bot.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

Kibo informs me that Roger Halstead
stated that:

On 30 Jun 2004 04:31:22 -0700, (Jorge Prediguez)
wrote:

Lionel wrote in message . ..
Serious question:
Suppose that I were to propose the creation of
rec.photo.digital.moderated?

The basic idea I'm thinking of is for RPDM to be a 'cleaned up' version
of RPD, with posts to RPDM being automatically xposted to RPD to make it
possible for RPD readers help digital newbies, & easier for others to
upgrade to the moderated group.

If I post to one group I'm going to complain if some one is cross
posting my posts to another group be it manually or by a bot.

I could use the same system as Google, & drop posts that have the
'X-no-archive yes' header set.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

Lionel wrote in


Kibo informs me that Roger Halstead
stated that:

On 30 Jun 2004 04:31:22 -0700, (Jorge Prediguez)
wrote:

Lionel wrote in message
m...
Serious question:
Suppose that I were to propose the creation of
rec.photo.digital.moderated?

The basic idea I'm thinking of is for RPDM to be a 'cleaned up'
version of RPD, with posts to RPDM being automatically xposted
to RPD to make it possible for RPD readers help digital
newbies, & easier for others to upgrade to the moderated group.

If I post to one group I'm going to complain if some one is cross
posting my posts to another group be it manually or by a bot.

I could use the same system as Google, & drop posts that have the
'X-no-archive yes' header set.


Did you bring the trolls in here to help justify your moderated group?

--
Wood

Woodrow the Usenet Guy = crop circle maker "it's extremely lucrative"

On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 08:11:59 GMT, Roger Halstead
wrote:

If I post to one group I'm going to complain if some one is cross
posting my posts to another group be it manually or by a bot.

And so why are you cross-posting this tripe to
rec.photo.darkroom ?


Regards,

John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.darkroompro.com
Please remove the "_" when replying via email

On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 19:12:50 +1000, Lionel wrote:

Kibo informs me that Roger Halstead
stated that:

On 30 Jun 2004 04:31:22 -0700, (Jorge Prediguez)
wrote:

Lionel wrote in message . ..
Serious question:
Suppose that I were to propose the creation of
rec.photo.digital.moderated?

The basic idea I'm thinking of is for RPDM to be a 'cleaned up' version
of RPD, with posts to RPDM being automatically xposted to RPD to make it
possible for RPD readers help digital newbies, & easier for others to
upgrade to the moderated group.

If I post to one group I'm going to complain if some one is cross
posting my posts to another group be it manually or by a bot.

I could use the same system as Google, & drop posts that have the
'X-no-archive yes' header set.

You've already proven that you've no clue what X-NA means, dufus. Why
don't you stick with something that you're more knowledgeable about,
like anal sex or fisting, for instance?

Kibo informs me that Woodsy Niles stated that:

Lionel wrote in


Kibo informs me that Roger Halstead
stated that:

On 30 Jun 2004 04:31:22 -0700, (Jorge Prediguez)
wrote:

Lionel wrote in message
om...
Serious question:
Suppose that I were to propose the creation of
rec.photo.digital.moderated?

The basic idea I'm thinking of is for RPDM to be a 'cleaned up'
version of RPD, with posts to RPDM being automatically xposted
to RPD to make it possible for RPD readers help digital
newbies, & easier for others to upgrade to the moderated group.

If I post to one group I'm going to complain if some one is cross
posting my posts to another group be it manually or by a bot.

I could use the same system as Google, & drop posts that have the
'X-no-archive yes' header set.


Did you bring the trolls in here to help justify your moderated group?

No, our anonymous troll went on a recruiting drive around all the flame
groups in Usenet & managed to find a bunch of trolls, such as yourself,
who don't mind being used to screwup a newsgroup.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

Kibo informs me that Woodsy Niles stated that:

Lionel wrote in


Kibo informs me that Roger Halstead
stated that:

On 30 Jun 2004 04:31:22 -0700, (Jorge Prediguez)
wrote:

Lionel wrote in message
om...
Serious question:
Suppose that I were to propose the creation of
rec.photo.digital.moderated?

The basic idea I'm thinking of is for RPDM to be a 'cleaned up'
version of RPD, with posts to RPDM being automatically xposted
to RPD to make it possible for RPD readers help digital
newbies, & easier for others to upgrade to the moderated group.

If I post to one group I'm going to complain if some one is cross
posting my posts to another group be it manually or by a bot.

I could use the same system as Google, & drop posts that have the
'X-no-archive yes' header set.


Did you bring the trolls in here to help justify your moderated group?

No, our anonymous troll went on a recruiting drive around all the flame
groups in Usenet & managed to find a bunch of trolls, such as yourself,
who don't mind being used to screwup a newsgroup.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 18:37:11 +1000, Lionel wrote:

Kibo informs me that Woodsy Niles stated that:

snip

Did you bring the trolls in here to help justify your moderated group?

No, our anonymous troll went on a recruiting drive around all the flame
groups in Usenet & managed to find a bunch of trolls, such as yourself,
who don't mind being used to screwup a newsgroup.

New definition of a troll: Someone who doesn't agree with, or like me
or my silly moderated newsgoup idea.

See also: Snuh, Snuh****, Snuhboi, etc. ad nauseum, blah, blah,
blah...

From: Lionel's Big Important Book of Usenet Terminology - Spankards
Edition.

On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 18:37:11 +1000, Lionel wrote:

Kibo informs me that Woodsy Niles stated that:

snip

Did you bring the trolls in here to help justify your moderated group?

No, our anonymous troll went on a recruiting drive around all the flame
groups in Usenet & managed to find a bunch of trolls, such as yourself,
who don't mind being used to screwup a newsgroup.

New definition of a troll: Someone who doesn't agree with, or like me
or my silly moderated newsgoup idea.

See also: Snuh, Snuh****, Snuhboi, etc. ad nauseum, blah, blah,
blah...

From: Lionel's Big Important Book of Usenet Terminology - Spankards
Edition.