If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Regular digital or digitial SLR?
I've had a digital camera for almost 4 years (Toshiba PDR - M70) and I've
never been happy with the quality of picture. It's 3.2 mega pixel, I always use the highest resolution, and I mostly "point and shoot." The colors seem OK, but the pictures are usually blurry/fuzzy. I would like to invest in a new camera. I have three young kids and mostly take pictures of them, both indoors and out. I am considering cameras such as Sony DSC P150, Canon G6, and Canon Digital Rebel. My question: Would I be happy enough with a "point and shoot," or is the picture quality significantly enough better that I should step up to a digital SLR prosumer type camera? All things being equal I'd rather not spend the $900 or so plus lug around a bigger camera (plus the manual options scare my technophopic wife), but if the result is that much better, it's a fai trade-off. Thanks in advance. Jeff |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Regular digital or digitial SLR? | Jitz | Digital Photography | 51 | January 3rd 05 09:04 AM |
NYT article - GPS tagging of digital photos | Alan Browne | Digital Photography | 4 | December 22nd 04 07:36 AM |
Sad news for film-based photography | Ronald Shu | 35mm Photo Equipment | 200 | October 6th 04 12:07 AM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 09:51 PM |
Lost Your Digital Pictures? Recover Them - Are you a professional photographer w corrupt digital images, an end user with missing photos? | eProvided.com | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | September 5th 03 06:47 PM |