If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
C-41 overexposure - What is effect on resolution and sharpness?
Does anyone have any numbers (RMS or MTF) to show how much the
resolution and sharpness of color negative film (print film) deteriorates when the film is over-exposed by 1 or 2 stops? For example, exposing 100 speed film at EI=50, exposing 400 speed film at EI=100 and EI=200, exposing 800 speed film at EI=400 and EI=200. Overexposure of color negative film (but not b&w negative film) is reputed to decrease the perceived graininess because its dye clouds overlap more, but I suspect that some tradeoff probably is paid in decreased resolution and sharpness. I understand that negative films give better sharpness when slightly underexposed. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
camera critter wrote:
Does anyone have any numbers (RMS or MTF) to show how much the resolution and sharpness of color negative film (print film) deteriorates when the film is over-exposed by 1 or 2 stops? Datasheets of movie film graph both grainyness and sharpness against ISO exposure value, but I've never seen that for still film. For example, exposing 100 speed film at EI=50, exposing 400 speed film at EI=100 and EI=200, exposing 800 speed film at EI=400 and EI=200. It depends on the film. Steve Dunn did a study with Supra 400 (IIRC) and decided it lost sharpness at 100 but not much at 200. When testing a film I try bracketing to see the grain/sharpness tradeoff. Grain often improves at +.3 EV but sharpness doesn't usually suffer until way beyond that. Overexposure of color negative film (but not b&w negative film) is reputed to decrease the perceived graininess because its dye clouds overlap more, but I suspect that some tradeoff probably is paid in decreased resolution and sharpness. I understand that negative films give better sharpness when slightly underexposed. I'd say that most negative films attain optimal sharpness when correctly exposed. When underexposed, they grain up (especially in shadows) thus reducing acutance. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What Print resolution for Epson 760 | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 3 | March 7th 05 03:17 PM |
8Mp Digital The Theoretical 35mm Quality Equivelant | Matt | 35mm Photo Equipment | 932 | December 17th 04 09:48 PM |
Scanning resolution, printing resolution, and downsampling | hassy_user | Digital Photography | 22 | October 27th 04 08:18 PM |
Monitor "resolution" | Alan Justice | Digital Photography | 1 | August 15th 04 02:34 AM |
Elitechrome 100 Slide Scanning with Coolscan V ED | Oliver Kunze | 35mm Photo Equipment | 23 | June 21st 04 12:07 AM |