Racoon

Slow films will fare better than fast ones as they age. This film,
hoever, was 30 years old, and not slow film. It simply is not worth the
trouble.

I stand by my advice, despite your experience.


F.C. Trevor Gale wrote:
Greetings; I feel I must repeat,

As I have pointed out a couple of times before, Scarpitti /
Uraniumcommittee, you really do not encourage or assist anyone at all

with the gross majority of your comments. It would be revealing to
establish a count of constructive and meaningful words in your
vocabulary and subtract from that count the number of offensive
and/or
vulgar words contained in your vocabulary.

As it happens I came across a package of old Ilford PAN-F
120-rollfilms
a few months ago with an expiry of 1980; I rated it at 2/3 box speed
and
it worked fine. I will not be throwing this film out - it will be
very
handy for checking my various medium-format gear for light leaks
etc.,
and also for taking shots from my storage oscilloscope. I would
suggest
to the original poster that they (a) ignore your line of derogatory
remarks and (b) try a roll at 2/3 box speed like I did.

Many folk are getting sick and tired of your splutterings.

My regards - F.C. Trevor Gale.

wrote:
I found a dead racoon in the road yesterday. A bus ran over it.
What's
the best way to cook it?

Slow films will fare better than fast ones as they age. This film,
hoever, was 30 years old, and not slow film. It simply is not worth the
trouble.

I stand by my advice, despite your experience.


F.C. Trevor Gale wrote:
Greetings; I feel I must repeat,

As I have pointed out a couple of times before, Scarpitti /
Uraniumcommittee, you really do not encourage or assist anyone at all

with the gross majority of your comments. It would be revealing to
establish a count of constructive and meaningful words in your
vocabulary and subtract from that count the number of offensive
and/or
vulgar words contained in your vocabulary.

As it happens I came across a package of old Ilford PAN-F
120-rollfilms
a few months ago with an expiry of 1980; I rated it at 2/3 box speed
and
it worked fine. I will not be throwing this film out - it will be
very
handy for checking my various medium-format gear for light leaks
etc.,
and also for taking shots from my storage oscilloscope. I would
suggest
to the original poster that they (a) ignore your line of derogatory
remarks and (b) try a roll at 2/3 box speed like I did.

Many folk are getting sick and tired of your splutterings.

My regards - F.C. Trevor Gale.

wrote:
I found a dead racoon in the road yesterday. A bus ran over it.
What's
the best way to cook it?

Encourage? The vast majority of people who venture into photography
have no business doing so and should be discouraged!


F.C. Trevor Gale wrote:
Greetings; I feel I must repeat,

As I have pointed out a couple of times before, Scarpitti /
Uraniumcommittee, you really do not encourage or assist anyone at all

with the gross majority of your comments. It would be revealing to
establish a count of constructive and meaningful words in your
vocabulary and subtract from that count the number of offensive
and/or
vulgar words contained in your vocabulary.

As it happens I came across a package of old Ilford PAN-F
120-rollfilms
a few months ago with an expiry of 1980; I rated it at 2/3 box speed
and
it worked fine. I will not be throwing this film out - it will be
very
handy for checking my various medium-format gear for light leaks
etc.,
and also for taking shots from my storage oscilloscope. I would
suggest
to the original poster that they (a) ignore your line of derogatory
remarks and (b) try a roll at 2/3 box speed like I did.

Many folk are getting sick and tired of your splutterings.

My regards - F.C. Trevor Gale.

wrote:
I found a dead racoon in the road yesterday. A bus ran over it.
What's
the best way to cook it?

Encourage? The vast majority of people who venture into photography
have no business doing so and should be discouraged!


F.C. Trevor Gale wrote:
Greetings; I feel I must repeat,

As I have pointed out a couple of times before, Scarpitti /
Uraniumcommittee, you really do not encourage or assist anyone at all

with the gross majority of your comments. It would be revealing to
establish a count of constructive and meaningful words in your
vocabulary and subtract from that count the number of offensive
and/or
vulgar words contained in your vocabulary.

As it happens I came across a package of old Ilford PAN-F
120-rollfilms
a few months ago with an expiry of 1980; I rated it at 2/3 box speed
and
it worked fine. I will not be throwing this film out - it will be
very
handy for checking my various medium-format gear for light leaks
etc.,
and also for taking shots from my storage oscilloscope. I would
suggest
to the original poster that they (a) ignore your line of derogatory
remarks and (b) try a roll at 2/3 box speed like I did.

Many folk are getting sick and tired of your splutterings.

My regards - F.C. Trevor Gale.

wrote:
I found a dead racoon in the road yesterday. A bus ran over it.
What's
the best way to cook it?

fotoobscura wrote:

: "Uranium Committee" is crying out for attention. Give it to him/her/it
: and you'll be asking for another Scarpetti which is likely two of the
: same with a new alias.

The troll is scarpitti.

--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------

fotoobscura wrote:

: "Uranium Committee" is crying out for attention. Give it to him/her/it
: and you'll be asking for another Scarpetti which is likely two of the
: same with a new alias.

The troll is scarpitti.

--




Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------