If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Sensors
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:50:07 -0400, "Michael Johnson, PE"
wrote: Bill Funk wrote: On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:10:04 -0400, "Michael Johnson, PE" wrote: CCD verses CMOS sensor size in a DSLR has more to do with lens design than in a P&S. There is full frame or, more commonly, the 1.6x crop size. Whether CCD or CMOS the physical size of the sensor has to be more consistent to conform to the lens properties across differing camera models while maintaining future compatibility. Are you sure? Then why do EF lenses work on both APS-C sensors AND full frame sensors? And, on Nikon cameras, why do their non-Digital (I don't know the appelation) work on both their APS sensor cameras and on their (old) full frame DSLRs and in both cases (Canon and Nikon) these leneses also work on the (obviously) full frame film cameras? Sensor size is roughly the same as film size for DSLR cameras. If you fit a 35mm film camera with a 24mm film roll what would happen? There would roughly be a 1.6x crop factor like there is with APS sensor DSLR. Nikon or Canon could come out with a 3x crop factor DSLR but why? Since lenses are changed on DSLRs having a sensor standard is more important. It makes lenses operate the same on a 10D, 300D, 20D, 30D, 350D 400D etc. This isn't a concern on P&S cameras since the lens stays with the camera and can't be changed. I'm not sure what your point is here. The point is this: "CCD verses CMOS sensor size in a DSLR has more to do with lens design than in a P&S." Whether the sensor is CCD or a CMOS doesn't alter the choice of sensor *size*, in a DSLR. P&S cameras have dedicated unchangeable lenses which allow CCD sensors to be smaller without any of these concerns. The sensor size in a Sony DSC-W100 (8.1mp) is 7.18x5.32 mm or 38.2 square mm. The sensor area of a 1.6 crop DSLR is roughly 338 square mm no matter what the megapixel rating. Out of this same area you can get 8-9 CCD type sensors. Well, of course you can. But those sensors won't fit in a camera that uses an APS-size sensor, like a Nikon D70s. Sure they will. You'll just have a higher crop factor. This isn't really practical for the reasons I gave above. Yes, that *could* fit, but that destroys the point of the whole 1.6 crop factor camera. Using he same size (or approximately, as with nikonCanon, the sensors will be the same size, whether CCD or CMOS. Once again the sensor size on a DSLR is the roughly the same for consistency between models and lenses. But it seems from what you're quoted as saying above, that you are saying that there's a size difference inherent in CCD and CMOS sensors. Again: "CCD verses CMOS sensor size in a DSLR has more to do with lens design than in a P&S." That's confusing to me. Why would a CCD sensor be a different size from a CMOS sensor in, say, a Canon 30D or a Nikon D80? It is a similar effect that AMD and Intel sees from going to a 65nm process from a 90nm one. They get more product from the same wafer size which means higher yields/profits and/or lower prices per unit. But that's not the reason they do this - it's to get faster speed while keeping heat down. The higher yield is a happy byproduct. I doubt the higher yield, and lower resulting cost per sensor, is just a byproduct but one of the main considerations in using CCD sensors in P&S cameras. This also allows the cameras to be smaller while retaining high resolution which seals the deal for the overwhelming majority of current P&S cameras to use CCD sensors, IMHO, of course. If a maker substituted a CMOS sensor in a camera that currently uses a CCD sensor,the sensor would be the same size, so yield would remain the same. -- Bill Funk replace "g" with "a" |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Sensors
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:12:05 -0400, "Michael Johnson, PE"
wrote: jpc wrote: On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:10:04 -0400, "Michael Johnson, PE" wrote: Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: Michael Johnson, PE wrote: CMOS may be cheaper to manufacture on an area basis but where CCD catches up is they are smaller more fit on a wafer (or the photo chip equivalent) so there is better economy of scale. Maybe I am wrong. Also, I thought the reason CMOS sensors aren't ideal for video is they can't do the rapid frame rate for extended time periods needed for smooth video without overheating. Really? Which is bigger, the CMOS 6.3MP sensor that the Canon Digital Rebel uses or the CCD 6.1MP sensor the Nikon D50/D70 and D70s use (among the Nikon branded cameras ... many others use that sensor). There are plenty of CMOS based video cameras out there. This one comes to mind with a simple Google search. http://www.globalsourcesdirect.com/s...-Camera/Detail CCD, when properly cooled, can achieve higher image quality than the CMOS counter part, and is why CCD is still used for astronomy; however, I am not sure that there are many DSLRs around with portable liquid cooling systems in them ... CCD verses CMOS sensor size in a DSLR has more to do with lens design than in a P&S. There is full frame or, more commonly, the 1.6x crop size. Whether CCD or CMOS the physical size of the sensor has to be more consistent to conform to the lens properties across differing camera models while maintaining future compatibility. P&S cameras have dedicated unchangeable lenses which allow CCD sensors to be smaller without any of these concerns. The sensor size in a Sony DSC-W100 (8.1mp) is 7.18x5.32 mm or 38.2 square mm. The sensor area of a 1.6 crop DSLR is roughly 338 square mm no matter what the megapixel rating. Out of this same area you can get 8-9 CCD type sensors. It is a similar effect that AMD and Intel sees from going to a 65nm process from a 90nm one. They get more product from the same wafer size which means higher yields/profits and/or lower prices per unit. As for the original poster's question, P&S camera's typically use CCD sensors. I have seen very low quality (and low mp count) P&S cameras use CMOS sensors. The camera you referenced is one of these since I could buy five of them for $550. I would also suspect the quality of the video to be low resolution. If CMOS were the better choice for the manufacturers of P&S cameras then I would expect them to be the norm and not the rare exception. CMOS does appear to be making inroads in the camcorder market. Personally, I think the camcorder will merge with the P&S camera in the coming years and if this happens the CCD sensor may be the ultimate winner. As for the end user's considerations, CCD based cameras tend to have higher noise levels. This is changing somewhat with the newer crop of higher ISO, lower noise P&S cameras. P&S cameras using a CMOS sensor are typically low end with low megapixel counts. Maybe this is because a CCD can pack more pixel sites in the same area compared to a CMOS chip. This promotes the design of smaller cameras while retaining high resolution which seems to be what the P&S manufacturers have been striving for the past several years. There are high end DSLR's using CCD sensors. However, I don't know of any high end P&S cameras that use CMOS sensors. Take what you will from this observation. Finally, I am basing the heat issue of CMOS compared to CCD sensors on what I have read here in this newsgroup. Maybe what I read was incorrect. IMO, this is a minor point of the discussion at hand. Each pixel in high end CMOS chips such as the ones Canor uses in it DSLR have two sections, the light colecting sensor and the transistor circuitry that keeps the noise low. This circuitry takes up silicon real estate, as much as 70 % in some of the earlier chips. So if you tried to make a small low noise CMOS chip for a point and shoot camera, you'd reach the point where the pixel was all transistor ciruitry with no room for a light sensor. I wonder if the CCD will find their way into most DSLRs if the noise issues are resolved. The P&S cameras look to have made advances in noise reduction in the last year but they are still not up with the current CMOS technology. Using CCD sensors would allow for the megapixel wars to continue (not that they need to) in the DSLR market since more pixels can be packed into the same area relative to CMOS sensors. There are a couple things going on that give large pixel CMOS sensors an edge. The first is that the transitor circuitry in the individual CMOS pixels does a better job of cleaning up what I call "left behind noise" That's the 1 to maybe up to 12 photoelectrons that aren't cleaned out in the idividual CCD pixels when the CCD circuitry resets everything just before the shutter opens. A few years ago when I last looked into the problem that was a major source of camera noise. I wouldn't be surprised if one of the main reason CCD sensors have improved recently is that the chip people have come up with a better way of zeroing out their sensors. A far more importart reason for using large sensors is that over most of the dynamic range of even small sensors, modern cameras are photon shot noise limited. That means the noise is in the light not the camera and is caused by the random way Mama Nature toses light into your lens. There a few tricks you can play to cut down on that noise in specific exposure regions--using a sensor with a cyan, magenta, and yellow color mask rather than a red green and blue mask like Nikon, Olympus and maybe a few other did four or five years ago--but the only good way to cut down on the noise is to collect more photoelectons in a large sensor. That way you end up with a better statistical averge and less noise. jpc |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Sensors
Michael Johnson, PE wrote:
I doubt the higher yield, and lower resulting cost per sensor, is just a byproduct but one of the main considerations in using CCD sensors in P&S cameras. This also allows the cameras to be smaller while retaining high resolution which seals the deal for the overwhelming majority of current P&S cameras to use CCD sensors, IMHO, of course. Tell Canon that ... they use CMOS in their point and shoot cameras. I am quite confident that they are doing it cheaper than Nikon is for their point and shoot camera. -- Thomas T. Veldhouse Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Sensors
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
Michael Johnson, PE wrote: I doubt the higher yield, and lower resulting cost per sensor, is just a byproduct but one of the main considerations in using CCD sensors in P&S cameras. This also allows the cameras to be smaller while retaining high resolution which seals the deal for the overwhelming majority of current P&S cameras to use CCD sensors, IMHO, of course. Tell Canon that ... they use CMOS in their point and shoot cameras. I am quite confident that they are doing it cheaper than Nikon is for their point and shoot camera. Which ones? I just picked up a S3IS and it's got a CCD, according to the online specs.. -- I do *NOT* have a short attention sp...(Oooh!! shiny!!) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Sensors
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" writes:
Tell Canon that ... they use CMOS in their point and shoot cameras. Which models? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Sensors
Philippe wrote:
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: Michael Johnson, PE wrote: I doubt the higher yield, and lower resulting cost per sensor, is just a byproduct but one of the main considerations in using CCD sensors in P&S cameras. This also allows the cameras to be smaller while retaining high resolution which seals the deal for the overwhelming majority of current P&S cameras to use CCD sensors, IMHO, of course. Tell Canon that ... they use CMOS in their point and shoot cameras. I am quite confident that they are doing it cheaper than Nikon is for their point and shoot camera. Which ones? I just picked up a S3IS and it's got a CCD, according to the online specs.. The entire PowerShot A seriers uses the Digic and Digic II CMOS sensor. The S3IS isn't on their website, so I can not say. Most of the SD models use Digic III CMOS sensors. In fact, I am unable to find a current model that has a CCD in it. -- Thomas T. Veldhouse Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1 |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Sensors
Paul Rubin wrote:
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" writes: Tell Canon that ... they use CMOS in their point and shoot cameras. Which models? Go to there web site, ALL the current models use CMOS Digic II or Digic III sensors. All the PowerShot A and SD series use CMOS. -- Thomas T. Veldhouse Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Sensors
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
Paul Rubin wrote: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" writes: Tell Canon that ... they use CMOS in their point and shoot cameras. Which models? Go to there web site, ALL the current models use CMOS Digic II or Digic III sensors. All the PowerShot A and SD series use CMOS. DIGIC2.. ccd http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co... odelid=13077 6.0 Megapixel, 1/2.5 inch type Charge Coupled Device (CCD) Total Pixels Approx. 6.2 Megapixels Effective Pixels Approx. 6.0 Megapixels P. -- I do *NOT* have a short attention sp...(Oooh!! shiny!!) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Sensors
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
Philippe wrote: Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: Michael Johnson, PE wrote: I doubt the higher yield, and lower resulting cost per sensor, is just a byproduct but one of the main considerations in using CCD sensors in P&S cameras. This also allows the cameras to be smaller while retaining high resolution which seals the deal for the overwhelming majority of current P&S cameras to use CCD sensors, IMHO, of course. Tell Canon that ... they use CMOS in their point and shoot cameras. I am quite confident that they are doing it cheaper than Nikon is for their point and shoot camera. Which ones? I just picked up a S3IS and it's got a CCD, according to the online specs.. The entire PowerShot A seriers uses the Digic and Digic II CMOS sensor. The S3IS isn't on their website, so I can not say. Most of the SD models use Digic III CMOS sensors. In fact, I am unable to find a current model that has a CCD in it. I answered upthread with a link for the S3IS.. It uses DIGIC II but lists the sensor as CCD (1/2.5) Maybe I'm not reading it right? (which could *easily* be possible, btw.. P. -- I do *NOT* have a short attention sp...(Oooh!! shiny!!) |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Sensors
Philippe wrote:
I answered upthread with a link for the S3IS.. It uses DIGIC II but lists the sensor as CCD (1/2.5) Maybe I'm not reading it right? (which could *easily* be possible, btw.. P. You never posted the link. However, the Digic II sensor is a CMOS, not a CCD sensor. -- Thomas T. Veldhouse Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
More about cleaning sensors and Canon Canada (long) | Celcius | Digital Photography | 16 | December 2nd 05 02:48 PM |
Digital Camera Pricing | measekite | Digital Photography | 75 | February 7th 05 10:23 AM |
Will EF-S Lenses Become Obsolete In A Couple Of Years? | Matt | 35mm Photo Equipment | 62 | November 28th 04 02:36 PM |
Will EF-S Lenses Become Obsolete In A Couple Of Years? | Matt | Digital Photography | 52 | November 22nd 04 02:25 AM |
Why separate AF sensors in DSLRs ? | Alfred Molon | Digital Photography | 133 | September 8th 04 07:51 AM |