If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Absolute beginner needs advivce
Hi,
I've just discovered your newsgroup, so here goes! I want to move up from 35mm / digital because for me quality of final image is important. I'm unsure wether to go to 6x6 or right into 5x4 (shooting mainly ladscapes). I've seen the quality you can get from 5x4 (fantastic), but I have some concerns and questions. If anyone can advise or maybe there is a 'beginners website', a link of two would be appreciated. I'd add that I like to take my time over taking a photograph, so setting up and time isn't a problem. Here are some of my questions: Cost is not an issue, and I appreciate finest engineering / optical quality, so recommendations for suitable cameras please (Ebony? Hasselblad - is the SWC worth considering?) How much 'better' is 5x4" over top quality 6x6cm (typically I'd want enlargements to A2/A1) What's the best lens available (wide-angle)? I've been told you need to take the lenses apart to mount on the board, is this difficult or can it be done by the dealer? Is the fuji quickload system worth considering? How do you develop the film (!) - how easy/difficult is it compared to processing 35mm? On a picture by picture basis, how much does it cost on average to process and print the relative formats? I have a hundred more questions! Any help or comments appreciated. Regards Steve |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Oh "GOODIE" a newbie!
In article , "Bert" wrote: Hi, I've just discovered your newsgroup, so here goes! I want to move up from 35mm / digital because for me quality of final image is important. I'm unsure wether to go to 6x6 or right into 5x4 (shooting mainly ladscapes). I've seen the quality you can get from 5x4 (fantastic), but I have some concerns and questions. If anyone can advise or maybe there is a 'beginners website', a link of two would be appreciated. I'd add that I like to take my time over taking a photograph, so setting up and time isn't a problem. First its fair to inform you it will take some time to acquire the skills to utilize the camera in a manner that will produce good work. Lots of people try larger format cameras and cast them aside. It also takes gumption to lug the cameras around in place of smaller easier to wield formats. I have been doing LF work since I was twenty, and am now 40. In any event I try to encourage anyone to try the larger format cameras mainly because its good for the users that others will buy film,gear etc. Keeps the makers in business. Here are some of my questions: Cost is not an issue, and I appreciate finest engineering / optical quality, so recommendations for suitable cameras please (Ebony? Hasselblad - is the SWC worth considering?) There are literally a ton of different 4x5 type cameras basically deciding what features you want and the weight you will carry are starting points. If doing landscapes a field camera is probably what you will want. Kerry Thalmann who posts here has a lot of insight regarding lenses and their specifications....website at http://www.thalmann.com/largeformat/ In any event more expensive is not always the best choice when starting there are alot of things to buy so being conservative until you find wether you like using the LF cameras is probably prudent. How much 'better' is 5x4" over top quality 6x6cm (typically I'd want enlargements to A2/A1) Typically we use standard printing paper sizes as opposed to office notation :-) 8x10, 11x14 and 16x20 at just about any size the LF should be head and shoulders above the 6x6.....you've seen it already!!! What's the best lens available (wide-angle)? I've been told you need to take the lenses apart to mount on the board, is this difficult or can it be done by the dealer? No problem at all, we use what is called a spanner wrench. Is the fuji quickload system worth considering? Personally I don't like it or the other readyload holders. How do you develop the film (!) - how easy/difficult is it compared to processing 35mm? One exposure or 6 at a time. Not more difficult. On a picture by picture basis, how much does it cost on average to process and print the relative formats? Really depends on the size, who develops and prints etc, etc. (Just the film) B&W processed at home is under a buck. and color runs about 3.00 to four dollars per exposure (If you use a lab). I have a hundred more questions! Any help or comments appreciated. Regards Steve -- LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Bert wrote:
How much 'better' is 5x4" over top quality 6x6cm (typically I'd want enlargements to A2/A1) A good eye will obviously see it. I've been told you need to take the lenses apart to mount on the board, is this difficult or can it be done by the dealer? This is done once, you buy a board for each lens. Is the fuji quickload system worth considering? Yes but not cheap, then again money is no object? On a picture by picture basis, how much does it cost on average to process and print the relative formats? I thought cost was no object? :-) -- Stacey |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 18:21:51 GMT, "Bert"
wrote: I want to move up from 35mm / digital because for me quality of final image is important. I'm unsure wether to go to 6x6 or right into 5x4 (shooting mainly ladscapes). If you tend to wide angle, you might consider the Mamiya 7 rangefinder. The lenses are unsurpassed, and 6x7 format provides more usable negative for rectangular prints than 6x6. The main disavantage for landscapes would be the difficulty of using graduated filters with the rangefinder viewer, and lack of camera movements. If you routinely use them, the Mamiya isn't really an option. Chris Ellinger Ann Arbor, MI USA http://www.ellingerphoto.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Bert" wrote in message ...
Hi, I've just discovered your newsgroup, so here goes! I want to move up from 35mm / digital because for me quality of final image is important. What kind of photography is important to you? That's really the question. You can get really high quality images with 4 x 5. but spontaneity is out of the question. There are no motorized 4 x 5 cameras (except large roll aerial cameras). I'm unsure wether to go to 6x6 or right into 5x4 (shooting mainly ladscapes). You may tire of landscapes before you know it. It's overdone, anyway. And often poorly. I've seen the quality you can get from 5x4 (fantastic), but I have some concerns and questions. If anyone can advise or maybe there is a 'beginners website', a link of two would be appreciated. I'd add that I like to take my time over taking a photograph, so setting up and time isn't a problem. Here are some of my questions: Cost is not an issue, and I appreciate finest engineering / optical quality, so recommendations for suitable cameras please (Ebony? Hasselblad - is the SWC worth considering?) How much 'better' is 5x4" over top quality 6x6cm (typically I'd want enlargements to A2/A1) What's the best lens available (wide-angle)? I've been told you need to take the lenses apart to mount on the board, is this difficult or can it be done by the dealer? Is the fuji quickload system worth considering? How do you develop the film (!) - how easy/difficult is it compared to processing 35mm? On a picture by picture basis, how much does it cost on average to process and print the relative formats? I have a hundred more questions! Any help or comments appreciated. Regards Steve |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Starting in LF one should begin with something basic, just to learn
the functionality. There's a lot of things to get a handle on before making the big investment into a high-dollar, high-quality piece of hardware and the glass that does with it. Up to 16x20, a b&w print from a blad is hard to tell from a 4x5 b&w. (Color neg prints are easier to tell apart.) In detail you may be pleased with what comes from medium format. But LF gives you some lens and film plane movements that cost a bundle on a medium format, and they're no available to all medium format systems. Tilting is very practical on landscapes, a little In 4x5, 8x10, & larger, any good lens is going to give you a nice print. There was a very good print in View Camera a few issues ago shot with a relatively inexpensive Wollensak 6 1/4" f12.5 lens. Even a mediocre lens give good results and you can be pleased with most of them. (In 4x5 I do recommend staying away from the Wollensak lenses on Graphics, except for the learning experience.) For (indoor or outdoor) color work, like the landscapes you suggest, color correction is most important. For that reason I'd recommend going with anything but Fuji lenses. I really don't like their color correction and it shows on chromes (though C-41 printing does compensate for it well). LF is expensive. Locally (Columbus, OH) I spend about $1 per sheet of film, $2.25 for processing (C-41/E-6), and $2 each contact. That's $5 just to start. Then I add in the cost each of the mistakes and it's roughly twice that price. A 4x5 contact is worth framing. I use old 4x5 film holders that are useless (the old graphic units) for simple frames. They're nearly free and make a suitable display for either b&w or color. Just get one and enjoy yourself. Collin "Bert" wrote in message ... Hi, I've just discovered your newsgroup, so here goes! I want to move up from 35mm / digital because for me quality of final image is important. I'm unsure wether to go to 6x6 or right into 5x4 (shooting mainly ladscapes). I've seen the quality you can get from 5x4 (fantastic), but I have some concerns and questions. If anyone can advise or maybe there is a 'beginners website', a link of two would be appreciated. I'd add that I like to take my time over taking a photograph, so setting up and time isn't a problem. Here are some of my questions: Cost is not an issue, and I appreciate finest engineering / optical quality, so recommendations for suitable cameras please (Ebony? Hasselblad - is the SWC worth considering?) How much 'better' is 5x4" over top quality 6x6cm (typically I'd want enlargements to A2/A1) What's the best lens available (wide-angle)? I've been told you need to take the lenses apart to mount on the board, is this difficult or can it be done by the dealer? Is the fuji quickload system worth considering? How do you develop the film (!) - how easy/difficult is it compared to processing 35mm? On a picture by picture basis, how much does it cost on average to process and print the relative formats? I have a hundred more questions! Any help or comments appreciated. Regards Steve |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Well no. Some types are not all that over done and not all images are poor.
Like any other type of photography. Oh what hell just give it all up right Mike? In article , (Michael Scarpitti) wrote: You may tire of landscapes before you know it. It's overdone, anyway. And often poorly. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I disagree with Michael as well, there are alot of
bad images in any one catagory. But there alot great scenics done as well. Mike likes to generalize to suit his personal taste or lack of it, in his case. In article , "No One" wrote: Well no. Some types are not all that over done and not all images are poor. Like any other type of photography. Oh what hell just give it all up right Mike? In article , (Michael Scarpitti) wrote: You may tire of landscapes before you know it. It's overdone, anyway. And often poorly. -- LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
It is wondrous how with a hundred or more years of photographic image making
someone still manages to amaze with as simple a thing as a photograph of a flower, a face or a shoe. "Gregory Blank" wrote in message ... I disagree with Michael as well, there are alot of bad images in any one catagory. But there alot great scenics done as well. Mike likes to generalize to suit his personal taste or lack of it, in his case. In article , "No One" wrote: Well no. Some types are not all that over done and not all images are poor. Like any other type of photography. Oh what hell just give it all up right Mike? In article , (Michael Scarpitti) wrote: You may tire of landscapes before you know it. It's overdone, anyway. And often poorly. -- LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Proud: Beginner at the Edinburgh Festival | Craig | Digital Photography | 1 | August 16th 04 06:56 PM |
Book recommendation for a beginner | Jerry | In The Darkroom | 3 | June 3rd 04 03:05 AM |
Mamiya 6 advice for MF beginner | Gavin | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 8 | February 2nd 04 06:35 PM |