If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Little review of the Olympus RC
Just got the Olympus RC..
POSITIVES... very solid metal build quality; apart from the lens glass breaking I can't see what harm can come to this camera. I have always been puzzled by people who complained about the "plasticky" feel of the Minox compared to the Rollei 35, but if the Rollei 35 (never handled one) is like the Olympus RC then I understand now. Can see both aperture and shutter settings in viewfinder. Fully mechanical feel and operation. Fully manual operation including aperture, focus, shutter and ASA. B shutter mode and ability to use standard cable release. I have liked the night photos that the olympus XA took with its meter and aperture control automation. Looks beautiful. Nice minimalist retro looks. http://tuaupe.50megs.com/images/olympus_35rc.jpg NEGATIVES... uses mercury battery which is no longer available, not sure if replacements are adequate. The batteries though are only needed for the meter. If you're used to the XA this is a considerably bigger camera and not really as pocketable. I'm not sure that it's much smaller or lighter than a pentax zx/mz-m. I am horrified though by the size of the Yashica Electro 35 GSN compared to the Olympus RC. http://www.barefoot.idv.tw/img_about...tro35_35rc.jpg Over the XA, the RC offers a more solid build and a fully manual override. Maybe also a slightly more professional impression as I can only guess not many people below a certain age have commonly seen this camera. Same can be said for the XA but the XA decidedly looks P&S or like a little toy. Does anyone know if the Olympus RC has better optics than the Olympus XA? The XA is certainly easier to use and more pocketable, and somewhat cuter or more adorable. This is my main complaint about it though, the aperture dial on the lens is a little hard to turn ergonomically. Quite hard actually for regular use, compared to the Minox or the XA. I think this is a camera that probably encourages setting the aperture to a certain value and varying the shutter speed, which is a little confusing for "sunny 16" but probably makes sense. The shutter dial though is quite nice. P.S. How does the Rollei 35 compare to the Olympus RC and the XA in size? is it in between the two? to which is it closer? Also, What camera comparable to the RC has the best optics with a rangefinder and full manual? Does the Minolta 7sII have a better lens? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Little review of the Olympus RC
Mike
Contact me, off-group. I'll give you the scoop on the Oly RC, and many more rangefinder's. QLP |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Little review of the Olympus RC
Mike Henley wrote:
P.S. How does the Rollei 35 compare to the Olympus RC and the XA in size? is it in between the two? to which is it closer? I have a 35 and an XA: http://www.pbase.com/len04/compacts The XA is fractionally smaller than the Rollei, but is much more pocketable owing to its lack of protruding bits when closed up. When ready-to-shoot the Rollei appears quite a bit bigger because its lens has to be pulled out to 40mm from the film plane - the XA has a telephoto design. - Len |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Little review of the Olympus RC
Mike Henley wrote:
Just got the Olympus RC.. . . . . . . . . . NEGATIVES... uses mercury battery which is no longer available, not sure if replacements are adequate. The batteries though are only needed for the meter. Check EBAY. There are a few solutions, depending upon what battery you need. If you're used to the XA this is a considerably bigger camera and not really as pocketable. I'm not sure that it's much smaller or lighter than a pentax zx/mz-m. I am horrified though by the size of the Yashica Electro 35 GSN compared to the Olympus RC. http://www.barefoot.idv.tw/img_about...tro35_35rc.jpg Yeah, the Yashica is a tank of a camera. I have two Yashica GT cameras. I even think these might be heavier than a few SLRs with a similar lens mounted. Over the XA, the RC offers a more solid build and a fully manual override. Manual override is nice to have, and something that I miss on the Yashica GT. Maybe also a slightly more professional impression as I can only guess not many people below a certain age have commonly seen this camera. Same can be said for the XA but the XA decidedly looks P&S or like a little toy. Does anyone know if the Olympus RC has better optics than the Olympus XA? The XA is certainly easier to use and more pocketable, and somewhat cuter or more adorable. This is my main complaint about it though, the aperture dial on the lens is a little hard to turn ergonomically. Quite hard actually for regular use, compared to the Minox or the XA. I think this is a camera that probably encourages setting the aperture to a certain value and varying the shutter speed, which is a little confusing for "sunny 16" but probably makes sense. The shutter dial though is quite nice. It could be the age of the camera, and some wear, affect the feel of the controls. P.S. How does the Rollei 35 compare to the Olympus RC and the XA in size? is it in between the two? to which is it closer? Pretty close in size, though the controls on the Rollei 35 are different. Ergonomics might be a bigger issue than just size. Also, What camera comparable to the RC has the best optics with a rangefinder and full manual? Does the Minolta 7sII have a better lens? I think there was a Minolta 9, or similar number identification, that you might want to compare. Overall, there are more Canon and Yashica rangefinders in some locations, or on EBAY, though if you look long enough, you can find the other types. There was also a Konica S3 that was well regarded, though it is tough to find, and costs more than some others. Ciao! Gordon Moat A G Studio http://www.allgstudio.com http://www.agstudiopro.com Coming Soon! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Little review of the Olympus RC
There was also a Konica S3 that was
well regarded, though it is tough to find, and costs more than some others. Hi Gordon, Isn't the Konica S3 a fully automatic camera? I really like that the Olympus RC is a fully manual camera. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Little review of the Olympus RC
Sabineellen wrote:
There was also a Konica S3 that was well regarded, though it is tough to find, and costs more than some others. Hi Gordon, Isn't the Konica S3 a fully automatic camera? Actually, shutter priority. I thought it would be good to mention it, since you are looking into older rangefinder cameras. It is a compact, high quality rangefinder, with a fairly nice lens. I really like that the Olympus RC is a fully manual camera. Fully manual control is definitely useful in many situations. Of course, the obvious solution would be an old Leica, or Nikon rangefinder, though a good example of either of those would cost more than ten fixed lens rangefinder cameras. Good luck in the hunting for other cameras. Ciao! Gordon Moat A G Studio http://www.allgstudio.com http://www.agstudiopro.com Coming Soon! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stabilization Effectiveness Canon S1 IS vs Olympus 2100UZ? | nesredep egrob | Digital Photography | 5 | July 12th 04 04:02 AM |
Olympus C-740 and Win98 version 1 | James M | Digital Photography | 2 | June 29th 04 12:57 PM |
Should I upgrade from my Olympus D-460 | Kayla | Digital Photography | 3 | June 29th 04 05:20 AM |
rust in classic camera + olympus RC batteries | Mike Henley | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | June 24th 04 03:36 PM |
Olympus RC vs Rollei 35 | Mike Henley | 35mm Photo Equipment | 11 | June 18th 04 10:54 PM |