If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
New Mandate: Interesting (see description)
Bob Larter wrote,on my timestamp of 5/08/2009 2:50 PM:
Noons wrote: On Aug 4, 5:31 am, "Bowser" wrote: Second rule of the shoot-in: absolutely nothing forces anyone to participate in that crap. Or read the posts, which you do voluntarily. Thanks! No problem. Now: kindly **** off aus.photo with your trolling or stay on topic, moron. What, you don't know how to filter either? Want some instruction? I'd be glad to help. You don't know enough about computers to tell anyone anything about filtering. Either stay on topic of the shoot-in or **** off aus.photo. Last warning. Or what? Just try it, ****head. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
New Mandate: Interesting (see description)
Bob Larter wrote,on my timestamp of 6/08/2009 2:37 PM:
Noons wrote: Bob Larter wrote,on my timestamp of 5/08/2009 2:50 PM: Noons wrote: On Aug 4, 5:31 am, "Bowser" wrote: Second rule of the shoot-in: absolutely nothing forces anyone to participate in that crap. Or read the posts, which you do voluntarily. Thanks! No problem. Now: kindly **** off aus.photo with your trolling or stay on topic, moron. What, you don't know how to filter either? Want some instruction? I'd be glad to help. You don't know enough about computers to tell anyone anything about filtering. Either stay on topic of the shoot-in or **** off aus.photo. Last warning. Or what? Just try it, ****head. I'm posting to aus.photo right now, tough guy. Yeah and in an on-topic thread, moron. You really don't get English, do you? |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
New Mandate: Interesting (see description)
Bob Larter wrote,on my timestamp of 6/08/2009 11:34 PM:
So, if I post some totally off-topic stuff to aus.photo, you'll do something terrible to me, will you? Only if I can get my hands on you. Otherwise, I'll just interfere with your thread until it stops being followed. You should be familiar with the technique: it's what filthy low-life trolls like you do. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
New Mandate: Interesting (see description)
On 2009-08-10 09:35:20 -0700, Annika1980 said:
On Aug 10, 7:52*am, Noons wrote: Bob Larter wrote,on my timestamp of 6/08/2009 11:34 PM: So, if I post some totally off-topic stuff to aus.photo, you'll do something terrible to me, will you? Only if I can get my hands on you. Otherwise, I'll just interfere with your thread until it stops being followed. You should be familiar with the technique: it's what filthy low-life trolls like you do. So not only are you threatening physical violence against Lionel, which is probably actionable should he choose to pursue it, you are admitting to being a filthy low-life troll, too. And you wonder why you consistently finish dead last in the "Most Lovable Person on Usenet' vote? Well per California Penal Code 422 he would be looking at a charge of "Terrorist Threats". "Any person who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement is to be taken as a threat, even if there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which on its face and under the circumstances in which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, and specific as to convey to the person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her safety or for his or her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed one year, or by imprisonment in the state prison." Now that is for a first offense.If there are aggravating factors fines can be as much as $10,000. It can be used as an enhancing charge to go along with stuff such as Battery, Assault with a deadly weapon, Attempted murder, etc. etc. This can also be considered to be "Interference with exercise of civil rights; damaging property; punishment; speech" It probably also applies to other states, and due to the ivil right implications, the Feds are probably not far behind. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
New Mandate: Interesting (see description)
"Savageduck" wrote in message
news:2009081016505688124-savageduck@REMOVESPAMmecom [...] This can also be considered to be "Interference with exercise of civil rights; damaging property; punishment; speech" It probably also applies to other states, and due to the ivil right implications, the Feds are probably not far behind. Given both parties are in Australia that is hardly likely. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
New Mandate: Interesting (see description)
Annika1980 wrote:
On Aug 10, 7:52 am, wrote: Bob Larter wrote,on my timestamp of 6/08/2009 11:34 PM: So, if I post some totally off-topic stuff to aus.photo, you'll do something terrible to me, will you? Only if I can get my hands on you. Otherwise, I'll just interfere with your thread until it stops being followed. You should be familiar with the technique: it's what filthy low-life trolls like you do. So not only are you threatening physical violence against Lionel, which is probably actionable should he choose to pursue it, you are admitting to being a filthy low-life troll, too. And you wonder why you consistently finish dead last in the "Most Lovable Person on Usenet' vote? Does Noons still post here, I have had him killfiled for months. Is he still cyber licking the anal region of a certain nut case from SE QLD? |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
New Mandate: Interesting (see description)
On 2009-08-11 05:45:07 -0700, Bob Larter said:
Savageduck wrote: On 2009-08-10 09:35:20 -0700, Annika1980 said: ------------------------------------------------- So not only are you threatening physical violence against Lionel, which is probably actionable should he choose to pursue it, you are admitting to being a filthy low-life troll, too. And you wonder why you consistently finish dead last in the "Most Lovable Person on Usenet' vote? Well per California Penal Code 422 he would be looking at a charge of "Terrorist Threats". "Any person who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement is to be taken as a threat, even if there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which on its face and under the circumstances in which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, and specific as to convey to the person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her safety or for his or her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed one year, or by imprisonment in the state prison." Now that is for a first offense.If there are aggravating factors fines can be as much as $10,000. It can be used as an enhancing charge to go along with stuff such as Battery, Assault with a deadly weapon, Attempted murder, etc. etc. This can also be considered to be "Interference with exercise of civil rights; damaging property; punishment; speech" It probably also applies to other states, and due to the civil rights implications, the Feds are probably not far behind. Noons & I are both in Australia, but I'm sure there are similar laws here. Not that I'd take any threat seriously from an idiot like Noons. I was aware of were you guys were in Australia, I was just showing that such Laws are obscure and exist in the US, and probably in Australia. Most people are surprised to discover their rants can have consequences. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
New Mandate: Interesting (see description)
Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 11/08/2009 2:35 AM:
So not only are you threatening physical violence against Lionel, which is probably actionable should he choose to pursue it, you are Wanna bet he doesn't? admitting to being a filthy low-life troll, too. No. I jsut use the same methods you lowe-lifes use. Fight fire with fire. What's gthe problem, don't like it? Then it's simple: get lost. And you wonder why you consistently finish dead last in the "Most Lovable Person on Usenet' vote? Wanna bet you are ahead of me? |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
New Mandate: Interesting (see description)
Savageduck wrote,on my timestamp of 11/08/2009 9:50 AM:
Well per California Penal Code 422 he would be looking at a charge of "Terrorist Threats". I am shaking already... BWAHAHAHAHA! |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
New Mandate: Interesting (see description)
Bob Larter wrote,on my timestamp of 11/08/2009 10:42 PM:
Only if I can get my hands on you. In your dreams, dickhead. Why, you think I can't drive past Lithgow? Otherwise, I'll just interfere with your thread until it stops being followed. quivers in fear Oooh! That's *scary* And effective. You should be familiar with the technique: it's what filthy low-life trolls like you do. *yawn* Exactly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[SI] Shootin Reminders: Mandate: Tubes & Special Mandate PanoMosaicsDUE 2008.10.26 | Alan Browne | 35mm Photo Equipment | 2 | October 25th 08 04:05 PM |
[SI] Shootin Reminders: Mandate: Tubes & Special Mandate PanoMosaicsDUE 2008.10.26 | Alan Browne | Digital Photography | 0 | October 16th 08 09:55 PM |
[SI] Shootin Reminders: Mandate: Tubes & Special Mandate PanoMosaicsDUE 2008.10.26 | Alan Browne | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | October 16th 08 09:55 PM |
[SI] Shootin Reminders: Mandate: Tubes & Special Mandate PanoMosaicsDUE 2008.10.26 | Alan Browne | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | October 16th 08 09:54 PM |