[Meta] POLL - RPE35mm Charter Amendments?

"Steve Young" wrote in message ...

1B] ...not allow posts/replies from Google Groups?

{ } Yes

{ } No

COMMENTS
I'm mixed on this one. As long as the originating ISP addy sticks through, I'd
say OK with Google, but no anon to/through Google.

DO YOU REALLY THINK YOU COULD TELL THE DIFFERENCE? OR EVEN BETTER YET
CAN GOOGLE TELL THE DIFFERENCE? GOOGLE WOULD EITHER BLOCK THIS WHOLE
****ING GROUP OR THEY WOULD NOT DO IT. CHOOSE ONE. LOOK AT MY HEADER
(IM SURE YOU ALREADY HAVE) TELL ME IS IT REAL OR IS IT MEMOREX? WOULD
I BE BLOCKED?

"Simone Wellington"

1B] ...not allow posts/replies from Google Groups?

{ } Yes

{ } No

COMMENTS

"Steve Young" wrote
I'm mixed on this one. As long as the originating ISP addy sticks through,
I'd say OK with Google, but no anon to/through Google.

"Jorge Prediguez" wrote
DO YOU REALLY THINK YOU COULD TELL THE DIFFERENCE?
OR EVEN BETTER YET CAN GOOGLE TELL THE DIFFERENCE?
GOOGLE WOULD EITHER BLOCK THIS WHOLE ****ING GROUP
OR THEY WOULD NOT DO IT. CHOOSE ONE. LOOK AT MY HEADER
(IM SURE YOU ALREADY HAVE) TELL ME IS IT REAL OR IS IT MEMOREX?
WOULD I BE BLOCKED?

Is "NNTP-Posting-Host: 200.76.184.162" resolvable?
Does this lead to you? OrgTechEmail:

Slow down Jorge, I've seen Google posts which *have*and those that haven't a
displayed posting host. My suggestion is that, if possible, Google block
postings to this group that do NOT include a resolvable domain. Can it be
done?, I have no idea, but none the less, it's high on my wish list. If they
followed this for most all Usenet groups, it would close another big hole,
without losing much, or any utility for truthful users..

Steve Young