If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Contrast ratio of LCD monitors
Don Stauffer in Minnesota writes:
The figures I had seen said 2% for the blackest black on fully exposed printing paper. This corresponds well to about the same value for 3M Black Velvet paint. I believe inks from printing press are a bit more reflective. I worked on a project developing blacks for sunshades on satellite optical instruments. It was hard to find ANYTHING blacker than 1%. The best blacks we had were between 1 and 2%. In the case of the printing paper, I don't believe that the contrast figures include specularly reflected light. After all, the paper gelatin surface will reflect something like 4% of the incoming light. But glossy paper, properly dried on a polished metal plate, gives a nice specular reflection and you naturally hold the print *to direct that reflection away from your eyes*. So the black you see is determined by the *diffuse* reflectance of the paper with the specular reflection removed. On the other hand, a paint rated as 2% reflectance is likely talking about total reflected light, including any specular component. Exercise: if you want a small area of really black stuff, get a package (or 10) of old-fashioned double-edge razor blades. Assemble all of the blades into a single stack and clamp them together. Now look at the two "faces" of the resulting structure that are a whole bunch of cutting edges viewed edge-on - these faces will be very black. Even though the cutting edges are actually shiny steel, they form a series of deep V-grooves with such shallow angles that any light which reaches the face gets bounced back and forth many times and eventually absorbed. Dave |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Contrast ratio of LCD monitors
HEMI-Powered wrote:
Victek added these comments in the current discussion du jour ... snip I'd make one observation here having purchased a 26" Samsung back in May. It seems that the popular trend in all LCD displays is to vastly over-saturate and over-brighten the display. As best I've been able to learn this is because the public thinks this makes the image jump off the screen better giving the illusion of greater dyamic range and greater sharpness. Well, maybe, but Seconded! Comparing LCD screen in the shop with their canned images I fell exactly into that trap, only to find out the Samsung widescreen I bought couldn't hold a candle to my old Philips in terms of smooth grayscale rendering, no matter how I tweaked it. Swapped the Samsung for a cheaper Philips widescreen which was tweakable... snip Another tip: be sure to buy only from a store that will give you a 100% refund with no restocking fee. You see, the features and yes! And also: do not put much value in reviews from PC journals, they cater to people with different needs, like gaming. -- Hans |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Monitors | Tizzi | Digital Photography | 14 | February 1st 06 02:18 PM |
Monitors | Tizzi | Digital Photography | 2 | January 29th 06 07:30 PM |
LCD Monitors? | HerHusband | Digital Photography | 17 | December 7th 05 06:19 PM |
Are LCD Monitors Brigter than CRT Monitors | Al | Digital Photography | 2 | September 8th 04 05:09 PM |
LCD monitors | Nostrobino | Digital Photography | 111 | August 30th 04 02:50 AM |