If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bell beginning to toll for reflexive optical viewfinders?
Fujifilm digital camera to use Kopin Viewfinder
Spectra-Photonics magazine: Fujifilm Corp. of Tokyo will intergrate the CyberEVR 230K-NF electronic viewfinder from Kopin Corp. of Tauton, Mass., into its FinePix S700 digital camera, designed primarily for amateur photographers interested in upgrading to an SLR-styled digital camera with advanced features. The viewfinder is designed to provide detailed images-even in bright sunlight - and to enable fine focusing. Thing I don't get is why the S-700? It's a cheap Fuji. If this finder is so great, why not put it in the top line Fuji P&S? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bell beginning to toll for reflexive optical viewfinders?
"RichA" wrote in message ups.com... Fujifilm digital camera to use Kopin Viewfinder Spectra-Photonics magazine: Fujifilm Corp. of Tokyo will intergrate the CyberEVR 230K-NF electronic viewfinder from Kopin Corp. of Tauton, Mass., into its FinePix S700 digital camera, designed primarily for amateur photographers interested in upgrading to an SLR-styled digital camera with advanced features. The viewfinder is designed to provide detailed images-even in bright sunlight - and to enable fine focusing. Thing I don't get is why the S-700? It's a cheap Fuji. If this finder is so great, why not put it in the top line Fuji P&S? Because all LCD viewfinders are crap compared to optical. Toby |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Bell beginning to toll for reflexive optical viewfinders?
RichA wrote:
... Thing I don't get is why the S-700? It's a cheap Fuji. If this finder is so great, why not put it in the top line Fuji P&S? ... "Electronic" viewfinders occupy approximately the same place in the world of viewfinders as plastic bodies occupy in the world of camera bodies. Yet somehow you expect to see such viewfinders in top-end cameras, while advocating against plastic bodies. You are a man of paradoxes, one might say |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Bell beginning to toll for reflexive optical viewfinders?
RichA wrote:
Fujifilm digital camera to use Kopin Viewfinder Spectra-Photonics magazine: Fujifilm Corp. of Tokyo will intergrate the CyberEVR 230K-NF electronic viewfinder from Kopin Corp. of Tauton, Mass., into its FinePix S700 digital camera, designed primarily for amateur photographers interested in upgrading to an SLR-styled digital camera with advanced features. The viewfinder is designed to provide detailed images-even in bright sunlight - and to enable fine focusing. Thing I don't get is why the S-700? It's a cheap Fuji. If this finder is so great, why not put it in the top line Fuji P&S? Because electronic viewfinders are not yet the equal to optical. Maybe someday, but until then the better equipment will continue to have optical finders. -- Joseph Meehan Dia 's Muire duit |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Bell beginning to toll for reflexive optical viewfinders?
"Joseph Meehan" wrote in message ... RichA wrote: Fujifilm digital camera to use Kopin Viewfinder Spectra-Photonics magazine: Fujifilm Corp. of Tokyo will intergrate the CyberEVR 230K-NF electronic viewfinder from Kopin Corp. of Tauton, Mass., into its FinePix S700 digital camera, designed primarily for amateur photographers interested in upgrading to an SLR-styled digital camera with advanced features. The viewfinder is designed to provide detailed images-even in bright sunlight - and to enable fine focusing. Thing I don't get is why the S-700? It's a cheap Fuji. If this finder is so great, why not put it in the top line Fuji P&S? Because electronic viewfinders are not yet the equal to optical. Maybe someday, but until then the better equipment will continue to have optical finders. -- Joseph Meehan Dia 's Muire duit How could they ever be? They need to downsample the image to display it on a small screen and that makes it useless for checking sharpness. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bell beginning to toll for reflexive optical viewfinders?
"N" wrote: "Joseph Meehan" wrote: Because electronic viewfinders are not yet the equal to optical. Maybe someday, but until then the better equipment will continue to have optical finders. How could they ever be? They need to downsample the image to display it on a small screen and that makes it useless for checking sharpness. SLR viewfinders are limited by the fineness of the fresnel lenses and ground glass or microprisms used. Their resolution is actually quite limited. So it should be possible to make an electronic viewfinder that's just as good. Someday. I liked the EVF on the Sony F707. I suspect the EVFs are getting worse, not better, though. The ones I've tried in the stores since then have been hideous. (I haven't tried them all, of course. I was in the largest camera store in Tokyo today and thought that maybe I should play with a few P&S cameras and a non-Canon dSLR or two, but just didn't have the energy for it.) David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Bell beginning to toll for reflexive optical viewfinders?
On Aug 18, 6:39 am, "David J. Littleboy" wrote:
"N" wrote: "Joseph Meehan" wrote: Because electronic viewfinders are not yet the equal to optical. Maybe someday, but until then the better equipment will continue to have optical finders. How could they ever be? They need to downsample the image to display it on a small screen and that makes it useless for checking sharpness. SLR viewfinders are limited by the fineness of the fresnel lenses and ground glass or microprisms used. Their resolution is actually quite limited. So it should be possible to make an electronic viewfinder that's just as good. Someday. I liked the EVF on the Sony F707. I suspect the EVFs are getting worse, not better, though. The ones I've tried in the stores since then have been hideous. (I haven't tried them all, of course. I was in the largest camera store in Tokyo today and thought that maybe I should play with a few P&S cameras and a non-Canon dSLR or two, but just didn't have the energy for it.) David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan Properly prepared ground glass is a really high res way to focus. I used to have a camera where I could change the focusing plane. Would love to have that on a DSLR camera I could afford. I do a lot of macro work, and placing the plane of best focus is essential to good macro work. Still, the DSLR I have beats by a large margin any EVF I have tried. Microprisms are not THAT bad. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Bell beginning to toll for reflexive optical viewfinders?
In article . com,
RichA wrote: Thing I don't get is why the S-700? It's a cheap Fuji. If this finder is so great, why not put it in the top line Fuji P&S? What I don't get is why you keep babbling on about things you know nothing about. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Bell beginning to toll for reflexive optical viewfinders?
On Aug 18, 10:37 am, Don Stauffer in Minnesota
wrote: On Aug 18, 6:39 am, "David J. Littleboy" wrote: "N" wrote: "Joseph Meehan" wrote: Because electronic viewfinders are not yet the equal to optical. Maybe someday, but until then the better equipment will continue to have optical finders. How could they ever be? They need to downsample the image to display it on a small screen and that makes it useless for checking sharpness. SLR viewfinders are limited by the fineness of the fresnel lenses and ground glass or microprisms used. Their resolution is actually quite limited. So it should be possible to make an electronic viewfinder that's just as good. Someday. I liked the EVF on the Sony F707. I suspect the EVFs are getting worse, not better, though. The ones I've tried in the stores since then have been hideous. (I haven't tried them all, of course. I was in the largest camera store in Tokyo today and thought that maybe I should play with a few P&S cameras and a non-Canon dSLR or two, but just didn't have the energy for it.) David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan Properly prepared ground glass is a really high res way to focus. I used to have a camera where I could change the focusing plane. Would love to have that on a DSLR camera I could afford. I do a lot of macro work, and placing the plane of best focus is essential to good macro work. Still, the DSLR I have beats by a large margin any EVF I have tried. Microprisms are not THAT bad. A magnifying EVF or LCD is superior for ultra-critical focusing on static objects. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Bell beginning to toll for reflexive optical viewfinders?
On Aug 18, 11:51 am, Randall Ainsworth
wrote: In article . com, RichA wrote: Thing I don't get is why the S-700? It's a cheap Fuji. If this finder is so great, why not put it in the top line Fuji P&S? What I don't get is why you keep babbling on about things you know nothing about. So offer up your vast (wedding photog!) expertise on the matter. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Optical viewfinders have been eclipsed | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 28 | July 13th 07 12:37 PM |
P&S optical viewfinders | Colin Brace | Digital Photography | 14 | April 3rd 06 11:06 PM |
It's A Beginning---- | GRC | Digital Photography | 6 | December 4th 04 09:11 AM |
Beginning amateur SLR - Canon Rebel | Kapsee | Other Photographic Equipment | 22 | September 14th 04 06:29 PM |
small steps - the beginning | John Bartley | Large Format Photography Equipment | 7 | May 28th 04 05:04 AM |