xD vs SDHC in Fuji s5800

wrote:
I've read several comments from separate individuals along the lines
of "capturing movies onto xD cards has resulted in better image
quality, more depth of colour etc".

Two words: BS

Now, I would have thought that the medium being used was irrelevant,
its the CCD and image processing that the camera does that makes the
difference. But is it at all possible that they are right? If so, I

A file doesn't change based on the medium it is stored on. Do those
'separate individuals' also claim that the image quality and depth of
color also changes when copying the file to a HD or when backed up to a
DVD?

jue

On 12/8/08 11:37 AM, in article ,
"Jürgen Exner" wrote:

wrote:
I've read several comments from separate individuals along the lines
of "capturing movies onto xD cards has resulted in better image
quality, more depth of colour etc".

Two words: BS

Is that like Joe Biden and the "three-letter word: J-O-B-S" thingy?

Jürgen Exner wrote:
wrote:
I've read several comments from separate individuals along the lines
of "capturing movies onto xD cards has resulted in better image
quality, more depth of colour etc".

Two words: BS

Now, I would have thought that the medium being used was irrelevant,
its the CCD and image processing that the camera does that makes the
difference. But is it at all possible that they are right? If so, I

A file doesn't change based on the medium it is stored on. Do those
'separate individuals' also claim that the image quality and depth of
color also changes when copying the file to a HD or when backed up to a
DVD?

Of course it doesn't make technical sense. But this isn't something that
prevents the marketoïds from taking strange decisions. I used to have an
Olympus P&S which would only take "panoramic" photos if the SD card was
an Olympus-brand one.

--
Bertrand

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:19:28 +0100, Ofnuts wrote:

Jürgen Exner wrote:
wrote:
I've read several comments from separate individuals along the lines
of "capturing movies onto xD cards has resulted in better image
quality, more depth of colour etc".

Two words: BS

Now, I would have thought that the medium being used was irrelevant,
its the CCD and image processing that the camera does that makes the
difference. But is it at all possible that they are right? If so, I

A file doesn't change based on the medium it is stored on. Do those
'separate individuals' also claim that the image quality and depth of
color also changes when copying the file to a HD or when backed up to a
DVD?

Of course it doesn't make technical sense. But this isn't something that
prevents the marketoïds from taking strange decisions. I used to have an
Olympus P&S which would only take "panoramic" photos if the SD card was
an Olympus-brand one.

It wasn't a matter of the brand of card, but that it had a special formatting.
If you search the net you'll find some utilities to repair or format any card to
work in that manner on that brand/model of camera.