If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
VIBRATION REDUCTION worth the cost to upgrade?
Can someone please tell me your experience using a VR lens, vs a
regular lens, and how likely you would be to recommend the upgrade? I'm looking to buy an 80-200 2.8 nikkor af ed lens; one I can get on a great discount for about $515 because it was used as a Demo lens, but is in excellent cond. The other lens has the VR feature, from ritz, for $750. Should I just fork it over, or can I save my pennies? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
VIBRATION REDUCTION worth the cost to upgrade?
"cassia" wrote in message
oups.com... Can someone please tell me your experience using a VR lens, vs a regular lens, and how likely you would be to recommend the upgrade? I'm looking to buy an 80-200 2.8 nikkor af ed lens; one I can get on a great discount for about $515 because it was used as a Demo lens, but is in excellent cond. The other lens has the VR feature, from ritz, for $750. Should I just fork it over, or can I save my pennies? Only you can decide that. If you have a problem holding the camera still (I have a nerve disorder that makes this impossible) then a stabilized lens would help you. If you don't end up with lot of blurry shots then you are probably fine without. Outside of this use stabilized lenses can let you shoot slower shutter speeds without needing a tripod or monopod. So if you shoot like 1/30 of second and wouldn't like to do away with a tripod then a stabilized lens will help assuming that you are capable of holding the camera very still yourself. It can't compensate for an unsteady photographer and a slow shutter speed. It can do one or the other. A stabilized lens will do nothing for subject movement like a flower blowing in the wind or a fast moving dog or something like that. For that you need a fast shutter speed if you want to stop the action and have no subject blur. =(8) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
VIBRATION REDUCTION worth the cost to upgrade?
On Apr 2, 10:24 pm, "cassia" wrote:
Can someone please tell me your experience using a VR lens, vs a regular lens, and how likely you would be to recommend the upgrade? I'm looking to buy an 80-200 2.8 nikkor af ed lens; one I can get on a great discount for about $515 because it was used as a Demo lens, but is in excellent cond. The other lens has the VR feature, from ritz, for $750. Should I just fork it over, or can I save my pennies? Why not look at the 55-200vr that may be available locally if not today sometime very soon for about half of the price? Unless you are looking for something paticular I think this would be a good sub for the 80-200. Doug |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
VIBRATION REDUCTION worth the cost to upgrade?
In article .com,
cassia wrote: Can someone please tell me your experience using a VR lens, vs a regular lens, and how likely you would be to recommend the upgrade? I'm looking to buy an 80-200 2.8 nikkor af ed lens; one I can get on a great discount for about $515 because it was used as a Demo lens, but is in excellent cond. The other lens has the VR feature, from ritz, for $750. Should I just fork it over, or can I save my pennies? VR or IS (I have Canon, so my lenses say IS, but it's the same basic thing), if you can, get the stablilized lens. Go down to your local camera store, ask to put one on your camera, turn it on, and watch the results through the lens as you activate it/focus with the shutter button. You can WATCH the image in the viewfinder "lock" into place. It's amazing. You'll buy the stabilized one. -- You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence. -- Charles A. Beard |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
VIBRATION REDUCTION worth the cost to upgrade?
"cassia" writes:
I'm looking to buy an 80-200 2.8 nikkor af ed lens; one I can get on a great discount for about $515 because it was used as a Demo lens, but is in excellent cond. The other lens has the VR feature, from ritz, for $750. If you mean the 70-200/2.8 VR, I don't think Ritz is selling it for $750. If you mean something like the 18-200, it's two stops slower than the 80-200 and therefore not really comparable. I think I'm saving my pennies for the 70-200/2.8 VR. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
VIBRATION REDUCTION worth the cost to upgrade?
cassia wrote:
Can someone please tell me your experience using a VR lens, vs a regular lens, and how likely you would be to recommend the upgrade? I'm looking to buy an 80-200 2.8 nikkor af ed lens; one I can get on a great discount for about $515 because it was used as a Demo lens, but is in excellent cond. The other lens has the VR feature, from ritz, for $750. Should I just fork it over, or can I save my pennies? I bought a camera with image stabilization because I often take photos in dim light where I can't use a tripod. Does the VR lens meet a need you have? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
VIBRATION REDUCTION worth the cost to upgrade?
In article , Marvin
wrote: cassia wrote: Can someone please tell me your experience using a VR lens, vs a regular lens, and how likely you would be to recommend the upgrade? I'm looking to buy an 80-200 2.8 nikkor af ed lens; one I can get on a great discount for about $515 because it was used as a Demo lens, but is in excellent cond. The other lens has the VR feature, from ritz, for $750. Should I just fork it over, or can I save my pennies? I bought a camera with image stabilization because I often take photos in dim light where I can't use a tripod. Does the VR lens meet a need you have? More importantly - does it meed a need that you probably *will* have?... remember, your needs WILL probably grow, and (IMO) you are better off only buying once instead of buying, selling, and re-buying. -- You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence. -- Charles A. Beard |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
VIBRATION REDUCTION worth the cost to upgrade?
On 2 Apr 2007 19:24:25 -0700, "cassia" wrote:
Can someone please tell me your experience using a VR lens, vs a regular lens, and how likely you would be to recommend the upgrade? I'm looking to buy an 80-200 2.8 nikkor af ed lens; one I can get on a great discount for about $515 because it was used as a Demo lens, but is in excellent cond. The other lens has the VR feature, from ritz, for $750. Should I just fork it over, or can I save my pennies? Depends what you want it for. It is a decent everyday lens and the VR means you can easily use it at the long end handheld with decent light. If you want to shoot moving subjects e.g. sports you're probably better served by a fast standard or telephoto zoom. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Coolpix 7900 Electronic vibration reduction | Sylvain Menard | Digital Photography | 3 | May 3rd 05 01:35 AM |
Coolpix 7900 Electronic vibration reduction | Sylvain Menard | Digital Photography | 0 | April 30th 05 02:34 AM |
Vibration Reduction on Zoom Lenses - A Worthwhile Upgrade? | paul | Digital Photography | 4 | April 15th 05 08:14 AM |
FS Nikon 8MP Digital Camera with Vibration Reduction Optical Zoom Lens | [email protected] | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 1 | February 15th 05 07:45 PM |
Nikon Coolpix 8800 Vibration Reduction (VR) | Linda_N | Digital Photography | 0 | October 2nd 04 05:07 PM |