If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
RPD Question on Nikon 5700 Battery Usage
Hello to the group. I've got a question concerning my Nikon 5700 and battery
usage: with the OEM rechargeable battery, I could usually do about 25 RAW images, before the indicator began moving and about 50 RAW images on a full charge, while the indicator slowly crept down. Sometime back, I added the MB- E5700 base mounted battery pack. I had initial problems with the NI-Mh batteries from the photo shop. I do not recall their brand now. With a full charge, they would not power up the camera. The shop replaced them with Camedia batteries by Olympus, which worked well, with one problem. On a fresh charge, I get about 2 RAW images, before the camera's battery indicator immediately falls to 1/4 charge. I can still shoot about 50 more RAW images, and have never run the batteries completely out, but the indicator really doesn't give me any idea of the actual state of the batteries. It doesn't seem to ever move from that 1/4 charge position. This can be very disconcerting, as I never know when the camera will just go dead. As I said, I have not fired until the batteries ARE dead, and always carry a complete set (six) fully charged spares, plus six non-rechargeables, just in case. Does anybody have any experience with the MB-E5700? Does anybody have any experience with the Camedia (Oly) rechargeables? Any thoughts on battery brand, or charger brands? So far, this has not created any problems, except for the fear, that I will suddenly run out of "juice," kinda' like driving an automobile with a gas gauge constantly stuck on 1/4 tank on a dark, lonely road. Also, these exposures are without the built-in flash. When using Nikon SB-80x, there seems to be no change in the indicator - still 1/4 battery life after 2 exposures and there it stays. Thanks for your input, Hunt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hunt wrote:
Hello to the group. I've got a question concerning my Nikon 5700 and battery usage: with the OEM rechargeable battery, I could usually do about 25 RAW images, before the indicator began moving and about 50 RAW images on a full charge, while the indicator slowly crept down. Sometime back, I added the MB- E5700 base mounted battery pack. I had initial problems with the NI-Mh batteries from the photo shop. I do not recall their brand now. With a full charge, they would not power up the camera. The shop replaced them with Camedia batteries by Olympus, which worked well, with one problem. On a fresh charge, I get about 2 RAW images, before the camera's battery indicator immediately falls to 1/4 charge. I can still shoot about 50 more RAW images, and have never run the batteries completely out, but the indicator really doesn't give me any idea of the actual state of the batteries. It doesn't seem to ever move from that 1/4 charge position. This can be very disconcerting, as I never know when the camera will just go dead. As I said, I have not fired until the batteries ARE dead, and always carry a complete set (six) fully charged spares, plus six non-rechargeables, just in case. Does anybody have any experience with the MB-E5700? Does anybody have any experience with the Camedia (Oly) rechargeables? Any thoughts on battery brand, or charger brands? So far, this has not created any problems, except for the fear, that I will suddenly run out of "juice," kinda' like driving an automobile with a gas gauge constantly stuck on 1/4 tank on a dark, lonely road. Also, these exposures are without the built-in flash. When using Nikon SB-80x, there seems to be no change in the indicator - still 1/4 battery life after 2 exposures and there it stays. Thanks for your input, Hunt It's possible you have one of the earlier MB-E5700s. They had a defect that rendered many rechargables useless. That may be contributing to the shortcomings you note. Later models have no problem. I understand Nikon will eventually exchange for a recent one if you persist. A few days ago I did a couple dozen RAWs on a fully charged set of Panasonic 2100MAh cells on a CP8700 and the little battery display still shows "full". -- Frank ess |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Hunt wrote:
In article , says... snip Frank, Thanks. Actually, I had been thinking about everything BUT the MB-E5700. I'll stop by my camera shop on Wed. and talk to the salesman. Since I've been an NPS member, since the 70's I suppose that I could go that route, however, NPS ain't what it used to be. I appreciate the response, and will pursue a replacement - one way, or the other. BTW, how did you get this info? I've done a bunch of searching and have looked at every Nikon site for something to help me, with NO LUCK, what so ever. Appreciated, Hunt I heard of it through one or another of the Yahoo! Nikon groups, if I remember correctly. Of course there is no guarantee of that: within the past few days I revisited a Web site whereon one of the victims has numerous photos of the offending battery compartment projection (that kept certain brands of cell from making perfect contact-short nipples) to see his update. Now I can't remember how I got there, nor the name of the fellow who put it there. A year or so there were a number of posts about the problem and its resolution in some online place I was reading. But I can't find those either. But it is out there. I promise. -- Frank ess |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
says... On 14 Sep 2004 03:50:12 GMT, in rec.photo.digital (Hunt) wrote: Thanks for thinking. I have tried searching with about every keyword combo I can, and only find new and used MB-E5700's. I was looking for ammo for making my appeal. Maybe a call to NPS will yield some results - like, "5700 is NOT a pro camera, so you are on your own, sport... " If you find a URL, I'd greatly appreciate it. If I had a set of serial #'s, or something, I'd try for a replacement. In a worst case, I'll just buy a new one, provided that my camera shop will guarantee that it is "new and improved Possibly mine? http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Photog...5700_nits.html _________________________________________________ _______ Ed Ruf Lifetime AMA# 344007 ) See images taken with my CP-990 and 5700 at http://EdwardGRuf.com Wow Ed, thanks for the work. Do you happen to have any record of the contacts you made at Nikon, i.e. e-dresses, names? I'd like to not reinvent the wheel on this one if possible, especially since you have put so very much effort into it already. In the meantime, I'll haunt the camera shops looking for batteries with long positive nubs! Thanks ever so much, Hunt (For any correspondence, please use , by removing the "D") |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
says... On 14 Sep 2004 03:50:12 GMT, in rec.photo.digital (Hunt) wrote: Thanks for thinking. I have tried searching with about every keyword combo I can, and only find new and used MB-E5700's. I was looking for ammo for making my appeal. Maybe a call to NPS will yield some results - like, "5700 is NOT a pro camera, so you are on your own, sport... " If you find a URL, I'd greatly appreciate it. If I had a set of serial #'s, or something, I'd try for a replacement. In a worst case, I'll just buy a new one, provided that my camera shop will guarantee that it is "new and improved Possibly mine? http://edwardgruf.com/Digital_Photog...5700_nits.html _________________________________________________ _______ Ed Ruf Lifetime AMA# 344007 ) See images taken with my CP-990 and 5700 at http://EdwardGRuf.com Wow Ed, thanks for the work. Do you happen to have any record of the contacts you made at Nikon, i.e. e-dresses, names? I'd like to not reinvent the wheel on this one if possible, especially since you have put so very much effort into it already. In the meantime, I'll haunt the camera shops looking for batteries with long positive nubs! Thanks ever so much, Hunt (For any correspondence, please use , by removing the "D") |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
says... On 13 Sep 2004 16:22:00 GMT, (Hunt) wrote: Does anybody have any experience with the MB-E5700? Does anybody have any experience with the Camedia (Oly) rechargeables? Any thoughts on battery brand, or charger brands? No experience with either the MB-E5700 or the Olympus batteries, but I did manage to find a dealer for replacement, non-OEM Nikon batteries. The lithium battery that ships with the 5700 is a very pathetic 650mAh. I picked up a pair of 1200mAh replacements for $14 ea. I think it was through a company called "Blue Nook" or something similar. I ordered my filter set through them as well (although they don't carry the filter adapters). In the standard charger that ships with the camera, it takes less than an hour to bring each of these to full charge. Most of my shoots these days are still in .jpg's but I average about 250-300 shots, without the flash, on a single battery. Aside from your MB-E5700 most likely being faulty, I'd be concerned with using anything other than a lithium battery in this camera. I know these packs are supposed to be designed for the different chemical compositions, and the electricity produced would be the same at the output regardless, but it always makes me twitchy to use cells that the camera weren't designed to take. I used to shoot with a Canon A40, and I could get about 30 shots off with a set of 4-AA alkiline cells. With 4-AA Ni-Cd's, though, I could shoot for a couple of days straight without issue. What I always found odd, though, is that the camera shipped with a starter set of alkalines, yet the manual, burried a few pages in, in small print no less, stated that only Ni-Cd's should ever be used. Go figure! Anyway, hope this sheds some light on the situation. Thanks for the feedback. It seems that Ed Ruf might have located the problem specific to my MB and the batteries. My first set probably were shorter on the positive end, than the Oly's, but the Oly's are still too short for the MB. I will also look into the in-camera batteries that you mentioned, though I really like the camera's balance with the MB attached, and of course, like the idea of the extra power - that I'm supposed to get - from the MB's batteries. Hunt |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nikon Coolpix 5700 focus problem? | David J Taylor | Digital Photography | 2 | July 22nd 04 10:48 AM |
Nikon Coolpix 5700 focus problem? | Michael Ryan | Digital Photography | 0 | July 22nd 04 10:48 AM |
Another MF scanner question!! Nikon 8000 vs. 9000 and B&W film | Q.G. de Bakker | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 9 | July 3rd 04 05:58 PM |