A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Film lens on DSLR?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 8th 04, 10:46 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Film lens on DSLR?

Hi,

My friend wants to give DSLR (Canon 300D) a try. He worries that his
film lens (EF) will not work or have problems on 300D. Did anyone have
similar experience?

The following also botheres me:

"
The 1.6x focal length multiplier means that the outer 40% (approx) of a
standard EF lens is not used
"

thanks!

  #2  
Old December 8th 04, 10:57 PM
Paul Bielec
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote in message
oups.com...
Hi,

My friend wants to give DSLR (Canon 300D) a try. He worries that his
film lens (EF) will not work or have problems on 300D. Did anyone have
similar experience?

The following also botheres me:

"
The 1.6x focal length multiplier means that the outer 40% (approx) of a
standard EF lens is not used
"

thanks!


The EF lenses work without any problem on my 300D. Basically, there is no
film EF lens.
On the other hand, there are digital EF lenses. The EF-S lenses will not
work properly on a film camera becasue they coverage is smaller than a non
EF-S lens.
So any EF-S lens he'd buy will not fit his film camera.
The 1.6x multiplier is not a problem but he will have to buy a new wide
angle lens if he needs one.


  #3  
Old December 9th 04, 12:12 AM
Skip M
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote in message
oups.com...
Hi,

My friend wants to give DSLR (Canon 300D) a try. He worries that his
film lens (EF) will not work or have problems on 300D. Did anyone have
similar experience?

The following also botheres me:

"
The 1.6x focal length multiplier means that the outer 40% (approx) of a
standard EF lens is not used
"

thanks!

All of Canon's EF mount lenses work just fine on the RebelD. So do most of
the aftermarket mfrs lenses, the only exception MAY be those older ones from
Sigma.
Since lenses generally soften out at the edges, not utilizing that part of
the lens usually presents little problem. It's just when your 17-35
suddenly becomes a 28-60 that the 1.6x crop presents a problem...

--
Skip Middleton
http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com


  #4  
Old December 9th 04, 01:21 AM
Michael A. Covington
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My friend wants to give DSLR (Canon 300D) a try. He worries that his
film lens (EF) will not work or have problems on 300D. Did anyone have
similar experience?


Some early Sigma lenses won't work properly. All Canon lenses will work.


The following also botheres me:
"
The 1.6x focal length multiplier means that the outer 40% (approx) of a
standard EF lens is not used
"


The digital sensor is smaller than a piece of film. So?


  #5  
Old December 9th 04, 01:21 AM
Michael A. Covington
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My friend wants to give DSLR (Canon 300D) a try. He worries that his
film lens (EF) will not work or have problems on 300D. Did anyone have
similar experience?


Some early Sigma lenses won't work properly. All Canon lenses will work.


The following also botheres me:
"
The 1.6x focal length multiplier means that the outer 40% (approx) of a
standard EF lens is not used
"


The digital sensor is smaller than a piece of film. So?


  #6  
Old December 9th 04, 04:29 PM
Chris Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
wrote:

The following also botheres me:

"
The 1.6x focal length multiplier means that the outer 40% (approx) of a
standard EF lens is not used
"


That's incorrect - 40% less of the *image circle* is used *that on a 35mm
camera*. 35mm doesn't use all of the image circle, a 300D uses slightly less
of it.

Here's a better way to think about it. The 300D is a smaller format than
35mm, so what constitutes "wide angle", "telephoto", and "standard" are
different, just as if you'd gone from 645 to 35mm.

For a 300D, the 35mm focal length is "standard", a 50mm is a short
telephoto, and so on.
  #7  
Old December 9th 04, 08:04 PM
Mr Jessop
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chris Brown" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
wrote:

The following also botheres me:

"
The 1.6x focal length multiplier means that the outer 40% (approx) of a
standard EF lens is not used
"


That's incorrect - 40% less of the *image circle* is used *that on a 35mm
camera*. 35mm doesn't use all of the image circle, a 300D uses slightly
less
of it.

Here's a better way to think about it. The 300D is a smaller format than
35mm, so what constitutes "wide angle", "telephoto", and "standard" are
different, just as if you'd gone from 645 to 35mm.

For a 300D, the 35mm focal length is "standard", a 50mm is a short
telephoto, and so on.


The outer edges of a lens are usually inferior to the centre area. You
usually get best quality when using f8 or f11. A zoom lens that has a
maximum aperture of 2.8 is big heavy and expensive. Using a wider imaging
circle means building extra large so that the area that is covered is flat.
The extra curve at the edge of a lense is what does them in. Aspherical
lenses are a big deal. Using a sensor that requires less covering power
than 35mm film is a boon. That is while digital lenses are cheap. They are
basically lense designs that would be considered utterly **** by normal
standards.


  #8  
Old December 9th 04, 08:04 PM
Mr Jessop
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chris Brown" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
wrote:

The following also botheres me:

"
The 1.6x focal length multiplier means that the outer 40% (approx) of a
standard EF lens is not used
"


That's incorrect - 40% less of the *image circle* is used *that on a 35mm
camera*. 35mm doesn't use all of the image circle, a 300D uses slightly
less
of it.

Here's a better way to think about it. The 300D is a smaller format than
35mm, so what constitutes "wide angle", "telephoto", and "standard" are
different, just as if you'd gone from 645 to 35mm.

For a 300D, the 35mm focal length is "standard", a 50mm is a short
telephoto, and so on.


The outer edges of a lens are usually inferior to the centre area. You
usually get best quality when using f8 or f11. A zoom lens that has a
maximum aperture of 2.8 is big heavy and expensive. Using a wider imaging
circle means building extra large so that the area that is covered is flat.
The extra curve at the edge of a lense is what does them in. Aspherical
lenses are a big deal. Using a sensor that requires less covering power
than 35mm film is a boon. That is while digital lenses are cheap. They are
basically lense designs that would be considered utterly **** by normal
standards.


  #9  
Old January 3rd 05, 02:45 PM
Dr. Joel M. Hoffman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My friend wants to give DSLR (Canon 300D) a try. He worries that his
film lens (EF) will not work or have problems on 300D. Did anyone have
similar experience?


The lens will work fine.

As to the 1.6 multiplication factor, take a look through the archives
of rec.photo.digital.

-Joel

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please feed the 35mm lens/digicam databases: http://www.exc.com/photography
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  #10  
Old January 3rd 05, 02:45 PM
Dr. Joel M. Hoffman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My friend wants to give DSLR (Canon 300D) a try. He worries that his
film lens (EF) will not work or have problems on 300D. Did anyone have
similar experience?


The lens will work fine.

As to the 1.6 multiplication factor, take a look through the archives
of rec.photo.digital.

-Joel

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please feed the 35mm lens/digicam databases: http://www.exc.com/photography
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Digital vs Film - just give in! [email protected] Medium Format Photography Equipment 159 November 15th 04 04:56 PM
Is it Copal or copal? Then what is it? Nick Zentena Large Format Photography Equipment 14 July 27th 04 03:31 AM
New Leica digital back info.... Barney 35mm Photo Equipment 19 June 30th 04 12:45 AM
Insane new TSA rule for film inspection [email protected] 35mm Photo Equipment 94 June 23rd 04 05:17 AM
The opposite of a close-up lens? Ralf R. Radermacher Medium Format Photography Equipment 44 April 14th 04 03:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.