If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#502
|
|||
|
|||
Lenses and sharpening
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:08:58 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: http://www.logbookwasilla.com/logboo.../11/20/iphone- a-camer a-to- laugh-at.html "This is the camera I have been using lately," I said as I pulled my iPhone out of my pocket and framed him on my screen. He sat there waiting expectantly, as he had misunderstood and thought I was going to show him a picture on my phone of whatever fancy camera I am now using. Then Floyd realized I had I had just taken his picture with my iPhone and it was the camera I was talking about. He burst out laughing. I took another shot.* I think I would laugh in the same circumstances. why? the camera in the 5s is very good, and *far* more portable than a nikon d3 or d4 with multiple lenses. If I have to explain a joke to you it ceases to be funny. what makes you think he was joking? i'm quite sure his iphone 5s really is the camera he has been using lately. Why do you think Floyd was laughing? because he's a condescending elitist asshole who will never admit that a camera in a phone can give his bulky kit a run for its money? just a guess. Because he was expecting something quite different and found he was caught by surprise when he realised what his friend was talking about. no it won't be the best choice in all situations but it can be in quite a few. No, that's only your best guess. http://austinmann.com/trek/iphone-5s-review-patagonia This iPhone 5S beats out the 5 in every camera test and in many ways I prefer it to my DSLR. *Sure it has its pros & cons but for the first time ever, I didn't bring my Canon 1DX and I didn't regret it one bit. That's saying a lot.* -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#503
|
|||
|
|||
Lenses and sharpening
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 19:01:29 -0700, Savageduck
wrote: On 2014-09-21 01:34:40 +0000, Eric Stevens said: On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:38:30 -0400, nospam wrote: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: Naah. That's got nothing to do with image processing, at least not in your limited range of knowledge. But I bet there are guys at Adobe who understand all this. i bet there are guys (and gals) at adobe who understand that a non-destructive workflow is reversible and laugh at all the bull**** being spewed here. I'm sure they do. so you finally agree it's reversible. amazing. I've never denied it. It's just that it's not fully reversible in the strict sense that Floyd used it. Floyd is using Lightroom & Photoshop? Amazing!!! Hell, or is it Barrow (that is more likely) has frozen over. You really do have a problem looking directly at what I have been saying. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#504
|
|||
|
|||
Lenses and sharpening
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:08:59 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: Naah. That's got nothing to do with image processing, at least not in your limited range of knowledge. But I bet there are guys at Adobe who understand all this. i bet there are guys (and gals) at adobe who understand that a non-destructive workflow is reversible and laugh at all the bull**** being spewed here. I'm sure they do. so you finally agree it's reversible. amazing. I've never denied it. yes you have. It's just that it's not fully reversible in the strict sense that Floyd used it. it is, but in a different way. two different uses of the term. the problem is that he won't acknowledge there can be other meanings because he's never used the software in question and is talking out his ass. There is no other meaning which can be applied to the term 'fully reversible' as used in physics. In using those words in that way he was expressing a particular rigorously defined meaning for which there is no substitute. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#505
|
|||
|
|||
Lenses and sharpening
On 2014-09-21 02:33:40 +0000, Eric Stevens said:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 19:01:29 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2014-09-21 01:34:40 +0000, Eric Stevens said: On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:38:30 -0400, nospam wrote: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: Naah. That's got nothing to do with image processing, at least not in your limited range of knowledge. But I bet there are guys at Adobe who understand all this. i bet there are guys (and gals) at adobe who understand that a non-destructive workflow is reversible and laugh at all the bull**** being spewed here. I'm sure they do. so you finally agree it's reversible. amazing. I've never denied it. It's just that it's not fully reversible in the strict sense that Floyd used it. Floyd is using Lightroom & Photoshop? Amazing!!! Hell, or is it Barrow (that is more likely) has frozen over. You really do have a problem looking directly at what I have been saying. What I am saying is, this tread has become very silly with all sorts of folks disagreeing, and talking at cross purposes. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#506
|
|||
|
|||
Lenses and sharpening
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:58:26 -0700, Savageduck
wrote: On 2014-09-21 01:33:01 +0000, Eric Stevens said: On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:07:04 -0700, Savageduck wrote: On 2014-09-20 23:39:49 +0000, nospam said: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: Nothing in your reply makes image processing be the same as thermodynamics, Eric. You're blathering about things you know nothing about. See http://tinyurl.com/mbrhs3e You failed again. Are you jusyt wildly googling and hoping that something will support your incorrect claims? Seems that way. "Maximum entropy method in image processing". Naah. That's got nothing to do with image processing, at least not in your limited range of knowledge. But I bet there are guys at Adobe who understand all this. i bet there are guys (and gals) at adobe who understand that a non-destructive workflow is reversible and laugh at all the bull**** being spewed here. Here is a gal at Adobe who understands the concept of a non-destructive workflow. http://www.jkost.com/lightroom.html And here is an Adobe guy who knows about entropy. http://www.adobe.com/devnet/adobe-me..._encoding.html Scroll down to find the heading "Entropy Encoding". Going into video encoding are you? Whatever happened to the affection for JPEGs? How do you think Adobe optimises the alignment of shots when constructing a panorama from a collection of images? -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#507
|
|||
|
|||
Lenses and sharpening
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:09:00 -0400, nospam
wrote: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: "Maximum entropy method in image processing". Naah. That's got nothing to do with image processing, at least not in your limited range of knowledge. But I bet there are guys at Adobe who understand all this. i bet there are guys (and gals) at adobe who understand that a non-destructive workflow is reversible and laugh at all the bull**** being spewed here. Here is a gal at Adobe who understands the concept of a non-destructive workflow. http://www.jkost.com/lightroom.html And here is an Adobe guy who knows about entropy. http://www.adobe.com/devnet/adobe-me..._encoding.html Scroll down to find the heading "Entropy Encoding". that has absolutely nothing to do with a non-destructive workflow and whether something is reversible. Which is why your contributions to this thread have been meaningless noise. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#508
|
|||
|
|||
Lenses and sharpening
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: I think I would laugh in the same circumstances. why? the camera in the 5s is very good, and *far* more portable than a nikon d3 or d4 with multiple lenses. If I have to explain a joke to you it ceases to be funny. what makes you think he was joking? i'm quite sure his iphone 5s really is the camera he has been using lately. Why do you think Floyd was laughing? because he's a condescending elitist asshole who will never admit that a camera in a phone can give his bulky kit a run for its money? just a guess. Because he was expecting something quite different and found he was caught by surprise when he realised what his friend was talking about. what's funny about that? anyone who laughs at a smartphone camera is an idiot. no it won't be the best choice in all situations but it can be in quite a few. No, that's only your best guess. nope. it's my opinion and that of many others who actually use one. http://austinmann.com/trek/iphone-5s-review-patagonia This iPhone 5S beats out the 5 in every camera test and in many ways I prefer it to my DSLR. *Sure it has its pros & cons but for the first time ever, I didn't bring my Canon 1DX and I didn't regret it one bit. That's saying a lot.* |
#509
|
|||
|
|||
Lenses and sharpening
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: "Maximum entropy method in image processing". Naah. That's got nothing to do with image processing, at least not in your limited range of knowledge. But I bet there are guys at Adobe who understand all this. i bet there are guys (and gals) at adobe who understand that a non-destructive workflow is reversible and laugh at all the bull**** being spewed here. Here is a gal at Adobe who understands the concept of a non-destructive workflow. http://www.jkost.com/lightroom.html And here is an Adobe guy who knows about entropy. http://www.adobe.com/devnet/adobe-me..._encoding.html Scroll down to find the heading "Entropy Encoding". that has absolutely nothing to do with a non-destructive workflow and whether something is reversible. Which is why your contributions to this thread have been meaningless noise. you have that backwards. anything other than a non-destructive workflow is noise. that includes thermodynamics, physics, entropy, flat earth and whatever else was mentioned. |
#510
|
|||
|
|||
Lenses and sharpening
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: And here is an Adobe guy who knows about entropy. http://www.adobe.com/devnet/adobe-me..._encoding.html Scroll down to find the heading "Entropy Encoding". Going into video encoding are you? Whatever happened to the affection for JPEGs? How do you think Adobe optimises the alignment of shots when constructing a panorama from a collection of images? what does that have to do with a non-destructive workflow? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sharpening | Alfred Molon[_4_] | Digital Photography | 23 | April 3rd 13 06:57 PM |
Sharpening | Ockham's Razor | Digital Photography | 11 | February 6th 07 08:35 PM |
Am I over-sharpening? | Walter Dnes (delete the 'z' to get my real address | Digital Photography | 12 | February 9th 06 06:58 AM |
RAW sharpening | embee | Digital Photography | 11 | December 24th 04 03:43 PM |
D70 on-camera sharpening vs. Photoshop sharpening | john | Digital Photography | 7 | July 23rd 04 10:55 AM |