If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
Film Lover's Lament
In article ,
no_name wrote: Gregory L. Hansen wrote: In article , no_name wrote: But yes, someone with the intellectial resources of DaVinci could probably figure out how read a microfiche, if for no other reason, that when you look at one, you can see that there's something there. Well, this line of the discussion is kind of silly, anyway. If you have microfiche to read, then there will be optical instruments to read it. Not necessarily. The whole point being argued is whether the tools to read the storage format will exist at some future date. It's entirely possible that in a post-holacaust world technology might be beaten so far down that the tools to read the data might not exist even if the storage media survived. What makes you think that the *microfiche* will be there to be read, then? Lenses are more durable than microfiche is. My point is that microfiche will require less complex tools to read than CD-ROM, and if the tools are not readily available for some period of time the microfiche is more likely to survive until tools become available again. I certainly have no argument about that. They'll be sitting near the microfiche. If any people survive at all, then there will be people that know something about making optical instruments from base materials. We don't have to pretend that the concepts of telescopes, microscopes, and grinding out lenses with grit and peices of glass hasn't occured to anyone. OTOH, some time might elapse before such skills are needed or before conditions allow such luxuries as telescope making. And when the time comes, they just might pull a few things out of the ol' garage or basement. How complete do we expect this destruction to be, and why would we expect humans to survive it if their artifacts don't? -- "Outside the camp you shall have a place set aside to be used as a latrine. You shall keep a trowel in your equipment and with it, when you go outside to ease nature, you shall first dig a hole and afterward cover up your excrement." -- Deuteronomy 23:13-14 |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Film Lover's Lament
In article ,
no_name wrote: Gregory L. Hansen wrote: Like scholarly textbooks and journals in research libraries at universities and corporations all over the world, plus works of a more popular nature in branch libraries all over the world, and private collections of materials in homes and merchandise inventories at booksellers? We don't have enough bombs to get all of the libraries. When you go for the encyclopedia article on the internal combustion engine you can pick up a microfiche reader while you're there. Where you going to plug it in? If you had a microfiche reader but no electricity, I'll bet you could find a way to cast light in there. The technology required was pretty well developed by about 2000 BC. -- "You're not as dumb as you look. Or sound. Or our best testing indicates." -- Monty Burns to Homer Simpson |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Film Lover's Lament
Gregory L. Hansen wrote:
In article , no_name wrote: Gregory L. Hansen wrote: In article , no_name wrote: But yes, someone with the intellectial resources of DaVinci could probably figure out how read a microfiche, if for no other reason, that when you look at one, you can see that there's something there. Well, this line of the discussion is kind of silly, anyway. If you have microfiche to read, then there will be optical instruments to read it. Not necessarily. The whole point being argued is whether the tools to read the storage format will exist at some future date. It's entirely possible that in a post-holacaust world technology might be beaten so far down that the tools to read the data might not exist even if the storage media survived. What makes you think that the *microfiche* will be there to be read, then? Lenses are more durable than microfiche is. My point is that microfiche will require less complex tools to read than CD-ROM, and if the tools are not readily available for some period of time the microfiche is more likely to survive until tools become available again. I certainly have no argument about that. They'll be sitting near the microfiche. If any people survive at all, then there will be people that know something about making optical instruments from base materials. We don't have to pretend that the concepts of telescopes, microscopes, and grinding out lenses with grit and peices of glass hasn't occured to anyone. OTOH, some time might elapse before such skills are needed or before conditions allow such luxuries as telescope making. And when the time comes, they just might pull a few things out of the ol' garage or basement. How complete do we expect this destruction to be, and why would we expect humans to survive it if their artifacts don't? As I said earlier, speaking of a post-holacaust world ... "it's unlikely even that level of technology would be retained, assuming it didn't turn into another global extinction event." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Elementary questions on film handling. | Liopleurodon | In The Darkroom | 22 | December 8th 05 06:37 AM |
"Nature's Best" contest and film vs digital | Bill Hilton | Photographing Nature | 15 | December 7th 05 11:03 PM |
"Nature's Best" contest and film vs digital | Bill Hilton | Digital Photography | 1 | November 28th 05 07:44 PM |
What film? | Art Reitsch | Large Format Photography Equipment | 5 | November 10th 05 12:14 PM |
The first film of the Digital Revolution is here.... | Todd Bailey | Film & Labs | 0 | May 27th 04 08:12 AM |