A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital SLR Cameras
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Finally got it!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 1st 06, 12:11 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Finally got it!

Hi all!

After a few months of unsuccesfully trying to manually focus my A95, I
decided to take the big step, so I became the happy owner of a Canon 350d
:-D
Being used to dig inside menus to change anything I didn't mind the lack of
more dedicated controls; what disappointed me a lot was the really awful
orange cast of the tungsten WB setting, but oh well, a few bad things keep
the balance with the good ones ;-)

By the way, I would be happy if you had a look and gave me constructive
criticism for my older efforts from the
A95:

http://www.pbase.com/melissakos

Now if I can only sound convincing to a specific someone, that I DO need a
macro lens and a 70-300 lens and a bigger tripod and and and....

Kostas



  #2  
Old May 1st 06, 12:27 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Finally got it!


"Belgos" wrote in message
...

Being used to dig inside menus to change anything I didn't mind the lack
of
more dedicated controls; what disappointed me a lot was the really awful
orange cast of the tungsten WB setting, but oh well, a few bad things keep
the balance with the good ones ;-)


I'll bet that it's almost exactly as bad as the orange cast I get when
shooting under tungsten lights with white balance set to something more
'normal'



  #3  
Old May 1st 06, 12:43 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Finally got it!

CJ,
Please explain "more normal".
I have the same problem. I've tried "automatic" and seem to get bette
results.
Thanks for any tip,
Marcel

  #4  
Old May 1st 06, 01:59 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Finally got it!


"Celcius" wrote in message
ups.com...
CJ,
Please explain "more normal".
I have the same problem. I've tried "automatic" and seem to get bette
results.
Thanks for any tip,
Marcel


I was actually being a bit tongue-in-cheek.

Not sure what you know about white balance, but it's designed to compensate
for different colour-temperature lighting. Tungsten has a very low colour
temperature - so if you tell the camera to expect something more "normal"
(like sunlight at mid-day) then you'll end up with an orange/red colour
cast.

Selecting a pre-set white balance can get close, but may not be close enough
for the perfectionists amongst us (ie just about all of us) - one of the
reasons I always shoot in RAW mode - a mode that makes it particularly easy
to compensate for any colour-temperature light.

If you're always shooting under the same lighting then you can probably set
in a custom white balance, but that's about as far as I can help - I avoid
JPG mode like the plague.



  #5  
Old May 1st 06, 02:16 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Finally got it!


"C J Southern" wrote in message
...

"Celcius" wrote in message
ups.com...
CJ,
Please explain "more normal".
I have the same problem. I've tried "automatic" and seem to get bette
results.
Thanks for any tip,
Marcel


I was actually being a bit tongue-in-cheek.

Not sure what you know about white balance, but it's designed to

compensate
for different colour-temperature lighting. Tungsten has a very low colour
temperature - so if you tell the camera to expect something more "normal"
(like sunlight at mid-day) then you'll end up with an orange/red colour
cast.

Selecting a pre-set white balance can get close, but may not be close

enough
for the perfectionists amongst us (ie just about all of us) - one of the
reasons I always shoot in RAW mode - a mode that makes it particularly

easy
to compensate for any colour-temperature light.

If you're always shooting under the same lighting then you can probably

set
in a custom white balance, but that's about as far as I can help - I avoid
JPG mode like the plague.



Thanks for the added info.
I usually set the WB to suit the shooting, almost never in Automatic.
However, sometimes, when I shoot indoors and its dark, with only a few
lights on,if I set to "tungsten", I get an orange tint.
The other night, Iset it to "automatic" and the photos were bluish ;-)
I heard through the grapevine (can't remember where) that the Rebel 350 had
a problem in dark rooms with flash...
Marcel


  #6  
Old May 1st 06, 04:04 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Finally got it!

Are you using a flash to supplement the incandescent lighting?

  #7  
Old May 1st 06, 04:42 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Finally got it!


"JimKramer" wrote in message
oups.com...
Are you using a flash to supplement the incandescent lighting?


Yes
I forgot to say. If I use WB set to flash in a darken room I get reddish
colors.
If I set WB to Incandescent lighting with flash, I might get a bluish tinge
If I set WB to automatic with flash I (usually get a so-so photo).
Of course, If I have good lighting, there is no problem.


  #8  
Old May 1st 06, 04:51 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Finally got it!


"Celcius" wrote in message
...

"JimKramer" wrote in message
oups.com...
Are you using a flash to supplement the incandescent lighting?


Yes
I forgot to say. If I use WB set to flash in a darken room I get reddish
colors.
If I set WB to Incandescent lighting with flash, I might get a bluish
tinge
If I set WB to automatic with flash I (usually get a so-so photo).
Of course, If I have good lighting, there is no problem.



Why not just set it correctly, thus avoiding all the problems. Failing that,
set it to automagic.


  #9  
Old May 1st 06, 05:01 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Finally got it!

"Rudy Benner" wrote in message
...

"Celcius" wrote in message
...

"JimKramer" wrote in message
oups.com...
Are you using a flash to supplement the incandescent lighting?


Yes
I forgot to say. If I use WB set to flash in a darken room I get reddish
colors.
If I set WB to Incandescent lighting with flash, I might get a bluish
tinge
If I set WB to automatic with flash I (usually get a so-so photo).
Of course, If I have good lighting, there is no problem.



Why not just set it correctly, thus avoiding all the problems. Failing
that, set it to automagic.


Pardon me, but if he's in a dark room using his flash to light it, would
not setting the WB to flash be the "correct" thing to do? And if that
setting didn't work for you, wouldn't you try some of the other settings to
see what the results were?

--
Regards,
Matt Clara
www.mattclara.com


  #10  
Old May 1st 06, 05:35 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Finally got it!


"Matt Clara" wrote in message
. ..
"Rudy Benner" wrote in message
...

"Celcius" wrote in message
...

"JimKramer" wrote in message
oups.com...
Are you using a flash to supplement the incandescent lighting?


Yes
I forgot to say. If I use WB set to flash in a darken room I get reddish
colors.
If I set WB to Incandescent lighting with flash, I might get a bluish
tinge
If I set WB to automatic with flash I (usually get a so-so photo).
Of course, If I have good lighting, there is no problem.



Why not just set it correctly, thus avoiding all the problems. Failing
that, set it to automagic.


Pardon me, but if he's in a dark room using his flash to light it, would
not setting the WB to flash be the "correct" thing to do? And if that
setting didn't work for you, wouldn't you try some of the other settings
to see what the results were?

--
Regards,
Matt Clara
www.mattclara.com


You are right, I apologize. Slap.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Banding problem with D200 finally confirmed GTO Digital Photography 0 February 12th 06 06:54 AM
FZ20 free case and battery offer - they finally arrived swingman Digital ZLR Cameras 0 April 28th 05 06:26 PM
Finally got a DSLR!! Larry Digital SLR Cameras 4 April 20th 05 06:40 PM
It's here - finally ! BobS Digital Photography 0 November 23rd 04 11:23 PM
Acros is finally in Collin Brendemuehl Large Format Photography Equipment 0 October 11th 04 12:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.