A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

First experiences with Adobe's DNG Converter



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 3rd 04, 08:26 AM
Gene Palmiter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default First experiences with Adobe's DNG Converter

I downloaded the new DNG converter from Adobe. The download was painless and
inside the zip file was an upgraded RAW plug-in and the DNG program. Neither
had to be installed...I just moved the old RAW plug-in to another place and
put the new one in. My Oly E-10 (4mp) takes a 7mp RAW file and the DNG was
compressed to 3.3mp for a big savings on space. It converts a folder at a
time and saves where ever one wishes. It can re-name the file and appears to
be able to add to the current file name which might be nice for cataloging
purposes.

Opening the DNG was the same as opening the ORF....that is the RAW for Oly.
From that point on its just the same as it was.

The hope is that in 20 years when no on remembers how to open an ORF the DNG
will still be supported and access to the RAW information will be retained.

--
Thanks,
Gene Palmiter
freebridge design group
freebridge magazine


  #2  
Old October 3rd 04, 10:05 AM
Ryadia
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Gene Palmiter wrote:



The hope is that in 20 years when no on remembers how to open an ORF the DNG
will still be supported and access to the RAW information will be retained.

You forgot to add... In a perfect world!
Good luck.
So far only Adobe support it!

Ryadia
  #3  
Old October 3rd 04, 02:17 PM
Gene Palmiter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I didn't forget. As Pandora discovered...there is Hope even in an imperfect
world. I am saving both sorts of files for the time being....and will until
I see support in a few other places.


"Ryadia" wrote in message
...
Gene Palmiter wrote:



The hope is that in 20 years when no on remembers how to open an ORF the

DNG
will still be supported and access to the RAW information will be

retained.

You forgot to add... In a perfect world!
Good luck.
So far only Adobe support it!

Ryadia



  #4  
Old October 3rd 04, 03:43 PM
Linda_N
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That's a wise move. I'm thinking with the industry (as in all related
companies) knowing what a money pig Adobe is the other companies will think
twice before allowing Adobe to control the foundation of such an important
move. They can all imagine that at some point they would have to pay Adobe
usage license fees for using the DNG, and the users are getting the 'free
for now' DNG Converter is just a way to get the public on side, but Adobe
will get money from us too in the future. Right now each company pays
nothing to use their form of raw.

Linda

"Gene Palmiter" wrote in message
newsZS7d.1206$MU6.503@trndny08...
I didn't forget. As Pandora discovered...there is Hope even in an imperfect
world. I am saving both sorts of files for the time being....and will
until
I see support in a few other places.


"Ryadia" wrote in message
...
Gene Palmiter wrote:



The hope is that in 20 years when no on remembers how to open an ORF
the

DNG
will still be supported and access to the RAW information will be

retained.

You forgot to add... In a perfect world!
Good luck.
So far only Adobe support it!

Ryadia





  #5  
Old October 3rd 04, 04:14 PM
Eric Gill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Linda_N" wrote in
:

That's a wise move. I'm thinking with the industry (as in all related
companies) knowing what a money pig Adobe is the other companies will
think twice before allowing Adobe to control the foundation of such an
important move. They can all imagine that at some point they would
have to pay Adobe usage license fees for using the DNG, and the users
are getting the 'free for now' DNG Converter is just a way to get the
public on side, but Adobe will get money from us too in the future.


That's always possible. However, Adobe has owned Tiff for some time, and
hasn't tried anything stupid. I think they learned their lesson with Type 1
format.

Right now each company pays nothing to use their form of raw.


And already we're seeing obsolescence of RAW formats. Adobe's idea is a
good one.

  #6  
Old October 4th 04, 06:05 AM
Scott Peterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Gene Palmiter" wrote:

I downloaded the new DNG converter from Adobe. The download was painless and
inside the zip file was an upgraded RAW plug-in and the DNG program. Neither
had to be installed...I just moved the old RAW plug-in to another place and
put the new one in


On the web site the DNG converter is under Photoshop CS. Does anyone
know if it will work with Photoshop 7?

Scott Peterson

--
Faith, n. Belief without evidence in what is told by one
who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel.
Ambrose Bierce

582/594
  #7  
Old October 4th 04, 11:09 AM
Jeremy Nixon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Scott Peterson wrote:

On the web site the DNG converter is under Photoshop CS. Does anyone
know if it will work with Photoshop 7?


The converter is a stand-alone program. But PS 7 won't be able to open
the resulting DNG files.

--
Jeremy |
  #8  
Old October 4th 04, 02:40 PM
Linda_N
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Eric Gill" wrote in message
4...
"Linda_N" wrote in
:

That's a wise move. I'm thinking with the industry (as in all related
companies) knowing what a money pig Adobe is the other companies will
think twice before allowing Adobe to control the foundation of such an
important move. They can all imagine that at some point they would
have to pay Adobe usage license fees for using the DNG, and the users
are getting the 'free for now' DNG Converter is just a way to get the
public on side, but Adobe will get money from us too in the future.


That's always possible. However, Adobe has owned Tiff for some time, and
hasn't tried anything stupid. I think they learned their lesson with Type
1
format.

Right now each company pays nothing to use their form of raw.


And already we're seeing obsolescence of RAW formats. Adobe's idea is a
good one.

I agree that a standard raw for all manufacturers is a good move. I just
hope that the development of the same is open source (not owned by any
specific company) otherwise us consumers will pay for it. One money hungry
company in control could put very hefty user fees on the use of the raw
after it becomes widely accepted/industry standard). This could result in
those hefty user fee costs to companies getting included in the retail price
tag for consumers to pay. Open source would prevent such greed for the most
part I suspect.

Linda


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kenko 0.16x Fish-eye Converter Nostrobino Digital Photography 10 August 13th 04 05:34 PM
Kenko 0.16x Fish-eye Converter Apteryx 35mm Photo Equipment 5 August 13th 04 05:34 PM
Kenko 0.16x Fish-eye Converter Nostrobino 35mm Photo Equipment 2 August 11th 04 04:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.