A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

[SI] - Shoot-In - Mandate - Tie-in



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old July 23rd 08, 04:58 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Dudley Hanks[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 629
Default [SI] - Shoot-In - Mandate - Tie-in


"jimkramer" wrote in message
...
"Paul Furman" wrote in message
...
jimkramer wrote:

Why does this keep happening?
http://si.jlkramer.net/rulz/rulz.htm


So, is the shoot-in dead?
No suggestions for the next mandate?


(last month)


It is dead. No more attempts at a resuscitation will be made by me.
-Jim


Hey, Jim, thanks for keeping it going as long as you did. It takes a lot of
work to coordinate something like the Si.

Take Care,
Dudley


  #22  
Old July 25th 08, 02:20 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Noons
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,245
Default - Shoot-In - Mandate - Tie-in

Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 25/07/2008 10:56 PM:
On Jul 25, 6:47 am, Noons wrote:
Now, can you and your ****ing paid off trolls go
back to that ******** you call pbase once and for all?


Noons, can I ask a serious question?

What is your gripe with the Shoot-In and/or Pbase?


the fact that all your sock puppets
pretend to use it,
the fact that pbase shamelessly use Usenet
to scam their site,
the fact that instead of using their
forums the pack of trolls from there
use anything else.
Isn't it obvious?

oh, the shoot-in? I couldn't care less.
  #23  
Old July 25th 08, 10:45 PM posted to aus.photo,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
BustedFrog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24
Default - Shoot-In - Mandate - Tie-in

Helen wrote:
On Jul 25, 12:30 pm, Annika1980 wrote:
On Jul 25, 9:20 am, Noons wrote:



What is your gripe with the Shoot-In and/or Pbase?
the fact that all your sock puppets
pretend to use it,

I don't need socks. I think you have me confused with Mr. "It's
Monday so I better change my name."

the fact that pbase shamelessly use Usenet
to scam their site,

Pbase doesn't advertise their site on Usenet, so what the Hell are you
talking about?

the fact that instead of using their
forums the pack of trolls from there
use anything else.
Isn't it obvious?

I rarely visit the Pbase forums, but I'm not aware of any Pbase
"trolls" going anywhere else. In fact, I don't even know what a Pbase
troll is.
Rita is a troll who posts on Flickr. Why not rag on Flickr?

The Shoot-In is hosted on Pbase. So are you claiming that everyone
who has participated in it is a Pbase troll?



oh, the shoot-in? I couldn't care less.

I'm sure. That's why you've always been against it and called Lisa a
Whore and lots worse. Maybe if you took that barbed wire corncob out
of your ass you'd feel a lot better about yourself and others. C'mon
Noons, you can't be a vile disgusting slimeball forever. Your hate
will eat you up.

You should also be careful calling someone a pedophile lest someone
think you may be projecting. It could also cause you legal problems.



"Your hate will eat you up."

Very well said, and I'm a firm believer in this because it's a true
fact.

"You should also be careful calling someone a pedophile"

I couldn't care less if others think I'm a sockpuppet. The truth is I
have access to criminal records including pedophiles world-wide.
Believe me, if Bret even had the slightest inkling of being a
pedophile, I would know about it.


No, that isn't the truth. Even respected Police forces in various
Western countries have to go through a long and difficult application
process to access criminal records from another country's Police if they
aren't currently involved in a joint project.

I wasn't certain before, I thought that you might be genuine, but that
little bit of BS has shown you for what you are. (...and not very good
at it.)

Ribbit


  #24  
Old July 26th 08, 12:57 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
BustedFrog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24
Default - Shoot-In - Mandate - Tie-in

Helen wrote:
On Jul 25, 5:45 pm, BustedFrog wrote:
Helen wrote:
On Jul 25, 12:30 pm, Annika1980 wrote:
On Jul 25, 9:20 am, Noons wrote:
What is your gripe with the Shoot-In and/or Pbase?
the fact that all your sock puppets
pretend to use it,
I don't need socks. I think you have me confused with Mr. "It's
Monday so I better change my name."
the fact that pbase shamelessly use Usenet
to scam their site,
Pbase doesn't advertise their site on Usenet, so what the Hell are you
talking about?
the fact that instead of using their
forums the pack of trolls from there
use anything else.
Isn't it obvious?
I rarely visit the Pbase forums, but I'm not aware of any Pbase
"trolls" going anywhere else. In fact, I don't even know what a Pbase
troll is.
Rita is a troll who posts on Flickr. Why not rag on Flickr?
The Shoot-In is hosted on Pbase. So are you claiming that everyone
who has participated in it is a Pbase troll?
oh, the shoot-in? I couldn't care less.
I'm sure. That's why you've always been against it and called Lisa a
Whore and lots worse. Maybe if you took that barbed wire corncob out
of your ass you'd feel a lot better about yourself and others. C'mon
Noons, you can't be a vile disgusting slimeball forever. Your hate
will eat you up.
You should also be careful calling someone a pedophile lest someone
think you may be projecting. It could also cause you legal problems.
"Your hate will eat you up."
Very well said, and I'm a firm believer in this because it's a true
fact.
"You should also be careful calling someone a pedophile"
I couldn't care less if others think I'm a sockpuppet. The truth is I
have access to criminal records including pedophiles world-wide.
Believe me, if Bret even had the slightest inkling of being a
pedophile, I would know about it.

No, that isn't the truth. Even respected Police forces in various
Western countries have to go through a long and difficult application
process to access criminal records from another country's Police if they
aren't currently involved in a joint project.

I wasn't certain before, I thought that you might be genuine, but that
little bit of BS has shown you for what you are. (...and not very good
at it.)

Ribbit- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


I forgot to remove aus.photo in my last reply. It's done now.

Sorry to disappoint you but you are dead wrong. I do have access to
such files and I don't care whether you believe me or not.
Your wording, your manner has d-mac written all over it.


Well I am not D-Mac, in case you haven't been awake when reading posts
he is less than enamoured of me. Quite bitter it seems.

You are a liar. I do not often say that, because it is often difficult
to be certain, but as I have occupation related knowledge of the process
one Police force has to go through to obtain criminal record data from
another Police force or judicial system, I can confidently say that you
are a liar. Even the FBI needs to make application through the court
system of a foreign country to have access to detailed (names and
addresses) criminal data related to offense and not person. I'll say it
again *you are a liar". Even Interpol has no direct access to criminal
records of other countries. But you do? Hmmmm. No, you are a liar.

Ribbit
  #25  
Old July 26th 08, 10:13 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
2SQUID
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default - Shoot-In - Mandate - Tie-in

BustedFrog wrote:
Helen wrote:
On Jul 25, 5:45 pm, BustedFrog wrote:
Helen wrote:
On Jul 25, 12:30 pm, Annika1980 wrote:
On Jul 25, 9:20 am, Noons wrote:
What is your gripe with the Shoot-In and/or Pbase?
the fact that all your sock puppets
pretend to use it,
I don't need socks. I think you have me confused with Mr. "It's
Monday so I better change my name."
the fact that pbase shamelessly use Usenet
to scam their site,
Pbase doesn't advertise their site on Usenet, so what the Hell are you
talking about?
the fact that instead of using their
forums the pack of trolls from there
use anything else.
Isn't it obvious?
I rarely visit the Pbase forums, but I'm not aware of any Pbase
"trolls" going anywhere else. In fact, I don't even know what a Pbase
troll is.
Rita is a troll who posts on Flickr. Why not rag on Flickr?
The Shoot-In is hosted on Pbase. So are you claiming that everyone
who has participated in it is a Pbase troll?
oh, the shoot-in? I couldn't care less.
I'm sure. That's why you've always been against it and called Lisa a
Whore and lots worse. Maybe if you took that barbed wire corncob out
of your ass you'd feel a lot better about yourself and others. C'mon
Noons, you can't be a vile disgusting slimeball forever. Your hate
will eat you up.
You should also be careful calling someone a pedophile lest someone
think you may be projecting. It could also cause you legal problems.
"Your hate will eat you up."
Very well said, and I'm a firm believer in this because it's a true
fact.
"You should also be careful calling someone a pedophile"
I couldn't care less if others think I'm a sockpuppet. The truth is I
have access to criminal records including pedophiles world-wide.
Believe me, if Bret even had the slightest inkling of being a
pedophile, I would know about it.
No, that isn't the truth. Even respected Police forces in various
Western countries have to go through a long and difficult application
process to access criminal records from another country's Police if they
aren't currently involved in a joint project.

I wasn't certain before, I thought that you might be genuine, but that
little bit of BS has shown you for what you are. (...and not very good
at it.)

Ribbit- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


I forgot to remove aus.photo in my last reply. It's done now.

Sorry to disappoint you but you are dead wrong. I do have access to
such files and I don't care whether you believe me or not.
Your wording, your manner has d-mac written all over it.


Well I am not D-Mac, in case you haven't been awake when reading posts
he is less than enamoured of me. Quite bitter it seems.

You are a liar. I do not often say that, because it is often difficult
to be certain, but as I have occupation related knowledge of the process
one Police force has to go through to obtain criminal record data from
another Police force or judicial system, I can confidently say that you
are a liar. Even the FBI needs to make application through the court
system of a foreign country to have access to detailed (names and
addresses) criminal data related to offense and not person. I'll say it
again *you are a liar". Even Interpol has no direct access to criminal
records of other countries. But you do? Hmmmm. No, you are a liar.

Ribbit


I might change my mind about you Froggy. Anyone who can see through the
pathetic bull**** and frilly front this cyber slut puts up needs at
least the common respect of being unbiased. Sorry you don't think much
of D-Mac.
  #26  
Old July 26th 08, 10:26 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm
2SQUID
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default - Shoot-In - Mandate - Tie-in

That Rich wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:33:08 -0700 (PDT), Helen
wrote:

Sorry to disappoint you but you are dead wrong. I do have access to
such files and I don't care whether you believe me or not.
Your wording, your manner has d-mac written all over it.


Well then, I'm sure the Canadian authorities would be interested in
hearing of *Helen's* habits of accessing confidential files for
personal use... it is a felony.

RP©


So is using the Internet for stalking. (in Canada). Of course in
Tennessee there is safe harbour for several Canadian smut peddlers.
Quaint little law from the 1800's that no one bothered to repeal.

You do know Rich, that any AOL user can access any of AOL's proxy
servers (even Australian and Canadian ones) and make it look like the
poster is in a different location to where they are? All you need do is
download a file from one of AOL's users with a list of IP addresses and
port numbers and Bret's your uncle! (so to speak).

**** mate... If the Police in one Australian State have to send a
written request to a neighbouring state for information on paedophiles,
what chance has a Canadian cyber slut got of finding out anything about
anyone? Zilch! Nada! None! She's a liar to.

Me and Big Squid.
  #27  
Old July 27th 08, 11:50 PM posted to aus.photo,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Noons
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,245
Default - Shoot-In - Mandate - Tie-in

Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 26/07/2008 2:30 AM:


I don't need socks. I think you have me confused with Mr. "It's
Monday so I better change my name."


BWAHAHAHAHA!



the fact that pbase shamelessly use Usenet
to scam their site,


Pbase doesn't advertise their site on Usenet, so what the Hell are you
talking about?


scam advertising
learn basic English, retard.


the fact that instead of using their
forums the pack of trolls from there
use anything else.
Isn't it obvious?


I rarely visit the Pbase forums, but I'm not aware of any Pbase
"trolls" going anywhere else. In fact, I don't even know what a Pbase
troll is.


anyone that has photos in pbase and spends their
online time in other places including Usenet, yahoo
groups and others, anonymously pushing the notion that
the "only place for photos" is pbase while deriding
anyone who has photos anywhere else.


Rita is a troll who posts on Flickr. Why not rag on Flickr?


because he openly trolls the morons from pbase
and I have yet to see him deride anyone else's
photos other than yours and D-Macs. Which is
a good thing in anyone's language.


The Shoot-In is hosted on Pbase. So are you claiming that everyone
who has participated in it is a Pbase troll?


No. But they do participate in a scam.


oh, the shoot-in? I couldn't care less.


I'm sure. That's why you've always been against it and called Lisa a
Whore and lots worse.


WTF is Lisa, dickhead? Make sense for once.

Maybe if you took that barbed wire corncob out
of your ass you'd feel a lot better about yourself and others. C'mon
Noons, you can't be a vile disgusting slimeball forever. Your hate
will eat you up.


BWAHAHAHAHA!


You should also be careful calling someone a pedophile lest someone
think you may be projecting. It could also cause you legal problems.



Anytime, you disgusting, slimeball, yellow-bellied coward
poor excuse for a human being, you ****ing PEDOPHILE!
  #28  
Old July 27th 08, 11:53 PM posted to aus.photo,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Noons
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,245
Default - Shoot-In - Mandate - Tie-in

BustedFrog wrote,on my timestamp of 26/07/2008 7:45 AM:
Helen wrote:
On Jul 25, 12:30 pm, Annika1980 wrote:
On Jul 25, 9:20 am, Noons wrote:



What is your gripe with the Shoot-In and/or Pbase?
the fact that all your sock puppets
pretend to use it,
I don't need socks. I think you have me confused with Mr. "It's
Monday so I better change my name."

the fact that pbase shamelessly use Usenet
to scam their site,
Pbase doesn't advertise their site on Usenet, so what the Hell are you
talking about?

the fact that instead of using their
forums the pack of trolls from there
use anything else.
Isn't it obvious?
I rarely visit the Pbase forums, but I'm not aware of any Pbase
"trolls" going anywhere else. In fact, I don't even know what a Pbase
troll is.
Rita is a troll who posts on Flickr. Why not rag on Flickr?

The Shoot-In is hosted on Pbase. So are you claiming that everyone
who has participated in it is a Pbase troll?



oh, the shoot-in? I couldn't care less.
I'm sure. That's why you've always been against it and called Lisa a
Whore and lots worse. Maybe if you took that barbed wire corncob out
of your ass you'd feel a lot better about yourself and others. C'mon
Noons, you can't be a vile disgusting slimeball forever. Your hate
will eat you up.

You should also be careful calling someone a pedophile lest someone
think you may be projecting. It could also cause you legal problems.



"Your hate will eat you up."

Very well said, and I'm a firm believer in this because it's a true
fact.

"You should also be careful calling someone a pedophile"

I couldn't care less if others think I'm a sockpuppet. The truth is I
have access to criminal records including pedophiles world-wide.
Believe me, if Bret even had the slightest inkling of being a
pedophile, I would know about it.


No, that isn't the truth. Even respected Police forces in various
Western countries have to go through a long and difficult application
process to access criminal records from another country's Police if they
aren't currently involved in a joint project.

I wasn't certain before, I thought that you might be genuine, but that
little bit of BS has shown you for what you are. (...and not very good
at it.)


I've only been telling you lot for
6 months this piece of **** is nothing but
a STUPID BITCH troll with no clue whatsoever
what (s)he's talking about.


Just another low-life, failed online scam artist
trying to revive interest in their crap products
in hope the glory days of the pre-dot com burst
will magically re-appear through the Usenet.

  #29  
Old August 4th 08, 03:10 PM posted to aus.photo,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
Noons
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,245
Default WARNING: IDIOT ALERT!

Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 4/08/2008 11:11 PM:
On Aug 4, 5:37 am, Noons wrote:
It's typical: ****wit disgusting morons like
you are simply too yellow-belied to carry
through any threats, veiled or otherwise,
but you always fall back on your coward attitudes.


Come on over tough guy so I can kick your ass proper.


BWAHAHAHA! You wouldn't know which part of your body
is your foot, you fat slob: you haven't seen it in years!

Like I said, they couldn't throw you on me if you were hot water.


Anytime, small mind.


Noons: the little Portuguese man with the big nose


Actually, dickhead: it's Australian. But you
would never understand something as basic as that.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SI] SHOOT-IN Mandate - Sky JimKramer 35mm Photo Equipment 0 February 14th 08 01:24 PM
[SI] - SHOOT IN - Early - New Mandate - Flowers JimKramer 35mm Photo Equipment 0 December 28th 07 06:58 PM
[SI] Shoot in photography challenge - New mandate - try it out! Alan Browne Digital SLR Cameras 10 June 5th 05 07:26 AM
[SI] Shoot-in your photos. Current mandate: "Parents" Alan Browne Digital Photography 0 April 25th 05 08:25 PM
[SI] photo shoot-in Mandate Alan Browne Digital SLR Cameras 0 April 9th 05 04:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.