I hate environmentalists

HEMI-Powered wrote:
Rich added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...

These people are the kind who want nature reserved only for
their kind, the hemp-sandal wearing KOOKS who like to protest
G20 meetings.

Unlike the rednecked ****wits who drive everywhere in their 5mpg monster
trucks tearing the land to shreds and shooting everything in sight.

It continues: 'We do not wish to stop photography, but to
encourage photographers to behave in a responsible manner at
nesting sites, reducing disturbance levels to dippers as much as
possible.'

The watchdog's advice leaflet warns photographers to not attempt
any photography during the nesting season (March to July) until
they know where the dipper's nest is. 'This may mean that you
will need to retreat a few metres and watch the movements of the
birds until you have located it [the nest].'

The leaflet was drawn up with the help of photographer Paul
Hobson who said: 'As a photographer, I know that it is entirely
possible to get shots of these beautiful birds successfully,
without disturbing them.'

Hobson, whose work has been featured in Amateur Photographer,
added: 'We are hoping photographers and other interested people
understand the reasons behind this code of conduct and follow
it.'

Bowler said he hopes the leaflet will raise awareness of the
problem among photographers and casual visitors. He added:
'Simple things such as limiting the time at the site can make a
real difference.'

The advice concludes by telling photographers: 'The welfare of
the subject is more important than your photography.'

Like all liberal Far Left Loons, and the subset of Green Nazis,

Did you read this piece at all before you started mouthing off.

Encouraging photographers to behave in a responsible manner is not an
unreasonable request.

It gave good practical advice on how to find and photograph these ground
nesting birds *without* disturbing them. Wildlife photography requires
patience and careful observation.

these clowns don't like to be confused by the facts. I don't have

How funny that you of all people should say that.

to garner attention by painting themselves with fake blood to make
it look like they were victims of police brutality.

You mean like the poor newspaper vendor on his way home who was the
victim of an unprovoked police attack and shortly afterwards died of a
heart attack? That gratuitous assault happens to be partly on video.

Regards,
Martin Brown

On 4/8/09 11:34 PM, in article ,
"John A." wrote:

On 09 Apr 2009 02:33:22 GMT, (Ray Fischer) wrote:

Rich wrote:
These people are the kind who want nature reserved only for their kind,

As opposed to you people who want the freedom to kill anything and
steal anything that isn't nailed down?

Folks like that remind me of little brothers. There's one cookie left
for them and their older brother. They want it all and their brother
wants to split it evenly. Their mom says split it evenly. So the
little brother screams and hollers that it's no fair their older
brother got he they wanted and they didn't.

"Their mom says split it evenly. So the little brother screams and hollers
that it's no fair their older brother got he they wanted and they didn't."

WTF are you trying to say here?

On 4/9/09 12:26 AM, in article
rnetamerica, "Jer"
wrote:

Rich wrote:
These people are the kind who want nature reserved only for their kind,
the hemp-sandal wearing KOOKS who like to protest G20 meetings. It
reminds me of the YUPPIE, latte-sipping urban envirokooks in California
who banned mountain bikes from wilderness areas for "degrading to the
environment" while they rode 1500lb horses all over the same place.


What's wrong with being reminded of the importance for being careful?
Besides, the exhaust from mountain bikes is quite different from that of
horses, and a horse fart disturbs the neighborhood a lot less. And you
know this.

Yeah but what comes after the fart is most disturbing. I don't think
mountain bikes take dumps. They make dump the rider, tho...

On 4/9/09 6:32 AM, in article ,
"Father Guido Sarducci" wrote:

In message ,
(Ray Fischer) said:

As opposed to you people who want the freedom to kill anything and
steal anything that isn't nailed down?

Depends. Are you nailed down?

Oh my, FATHER!

I am so ashamed of you.

On 4/9/09 9:50 AM, in article ,
"Father Guido Sarducci" wrote:

In message news Jer said:

Rich wrote:
These people are the kind who want nature reserved only for their kind,
the hemp-sandal wearing KOOKS who like to protest G20 meetings. It
reminds me of the YUPPIE, latte-sipping urban envirokooks in California
who banned mountain bikes from wilderness areas for "degrading to the
environment" while they rode 1500lb horses all over the same place.


What's wrong with being reminded of the importance for being careful?

Have you ever stepped on a bug?

Besides, the exhaust from mountain bikes is quite different from that of
horses, and a horse fart disturbs the neighborhood a lot less. And you
know this.

Mountain bikes are not powered, genius.
Bull! One human power: No more - no less. Unless you're Lance Armstrong...

On 4/9/09 10:41 AM, in article , "Martin
Brown" wrote:

HEMI-Powered wrote:
Rich added these comments in the current discussion du jour ...

These people are the kind who want nature reserved only for
their kind, the hemp-sandal wearing KOOKS who like to protest
G20 meetings.

Unlike the rednecked ****wits who drive everywhere in their 5mpg monster
trucks tearing the land to shreds and shooting everything in sight.

Like these rat-*******s who should have Jack Bauer attach jumper cables to
their nipples...

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/6365427.html

People who kill pets go on to be Serial Killers

Rich wrote:
These people are the kind who want nature reserved only for their kind,
the hemp-sandal wearing KOOKS who like to protest G20 meetings. It
reminds me of the YUPPIE, latte-sipping urban envirokooks in California
who banned mountain bikes from wilderness areas for "degrading to the
environment" while they rode 1500lb horses all over the same place.

While it's true that mountain bikes are much less damaging to the trails
and wildlife than horses (and often less damaging than hikers), I don't
see what that has to do with:

'The welfare of the subject is more important than your photography.'

Father Guido Sarducci wrote:
In message news Jer said:

Rich wrote:
These people are the kind who want nature reserved only for their kind,
the hemp-sandal wearing KOOKS who like to protest G20 meetings. It
reminds me of the YUPPIE, latte-sipping urban envirokooks in California
who banned mountain bikes from wilderness areas for "degrading to the
environment" while they rode 1500lb horses all over the same place.

What's wrong with being reminded of the importance for being careful?

Have you ever stepped on a bug?

Yup, just before I yanked the legs off and ate it.


Besides, the exhaust from mountain bikes is quite different from that of
horses, and a horse fart disturbs the neighborhood a lot less. And you
know this.

Mountain bikes are not powered, genius.


Down here they are.

--
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'

Nicko wrote in news:91aa7ff6-7b65-401f-ade5-
:

On Apr 8, 6:31*pm, Rich wrote:
These people are the kind who want nature reserved only for their kind,
the hemp-sandal wearing KOOKS who like to protest G20 meetings. *It
reminds me of the YUPPIE, latte-sipping urban envirokooks in California
who banned mountain bikes from wilderness areas for "degrading to the
environment" while they rode 1500lb horses all over the same place.

If there is a problem, it is with people of YOUR kind--who want nature
reserved for them to exploit regardless of the consequences for anyone
but yourself, you arrogant, solipsistic ****.

Right. It's your world, mister.

Everything else just trying to live in it.

--
YOP...


I love nature, I HATE environmentalists.

(Ray Fischer) wrote in news:49dd5e72$0$1600
:

Rich wrote:
These people are the kind who want nature reserved only for their kind,

As opposed to you people who want the freedom to kill anything and
steal anything that isn't nailed down?


That would be the Chinese. Which is why 1/2 the animal species in Asia are
in danger.