If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#931
|
|||
|
|||
'me', I've seen your work, and don't need to return to that thread to
take a wild guess that you were, as usual, posting abuse and stupidity without a shred of any useful, relevant information. Just like here - there is absolutely f@ck-all ontopic, decent information in your posts. It is clear your entire life is devoted to pretending you are a photographer and stalking anyone who bites (CHOMP!) on your trolling. Well, I'm happy to do that. So stalk away and abuse away. And I'll just continue to point out your lame posts. I'm here for information - you are here to try to make a man of yourself. But you're clearly ****ing into a headwind. I'm happy for you and I to both be judged on content of posts. Repeated kindergarten-level cliches, along with zero information or examples, added to continual abuse of anyone who doesn't lick your ass, seems to be your style. My style is a little different. And if you post this CRAP on a public forum, whether or not it is aimed at me, don't be too shocked and surprised if I point out your inadequacies. So, if you reckon that's 'begging for abuse', knock yourself out. Everyone here is REAL impressed with you. And you do SO much good for your cause. (The last two sentences were sarcasm. You might need to look it up.) |
#933
|
|||
|
|||
Jon Pike writes:
wrote in : Jon Pike writes: wrote in : You're entirely missing the point. What all the digital supporters seem to be saying is that, although they have no real basis for it, they -think- that all the important information is being captured. And what you're saying is that, although you have no real basis for it, you -think- that important information is being lost. No, I've seen results of tests No, no, no, Jon! No fair using the plural here! Yes, perfectly fair. He tested several things, so there were several tests done. What "several things"? The same piece of film, scanned and seen through a microscope. Came up with two numbers that seem to you to be the most important facts. No, the *only* important facts. snip -- -Stephen H. Westin Any information or opinions in this message are mine: they do not represent the position of Cornell University or any of its sponsors. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
35mm on grade 3 explained | Michael Scarpitti | In The Darkroom | 240 | September 26th 04 02:46 AM |
Digital quality (vs 35mm): Any real answers? | Toralf | 35mm Photo Equipment | 274 | July 30th 04 12:26 AM |
Digital quality (vs 35mm): Any real answers? | Toralf | Digital Photography | 213 | July 28th 04 06:30 PM |
Will digital photography ever stabilize? | Alfred Molon | Digital Photography | 37 | June 30th 04 08:11 PM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 09:51 PM |