A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Should I buy a 6D or 5D4?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #33  
Old May 11th 17, 11:41 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
android
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,854
Default Should I buy a 6D or 5D4?

In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote:

On Wednesday, 10 May 2017 17:24:40 UTC+1, android wrote:
In article 2017051008534346517-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2017-05-10 15:28:14 +0000, Whisky-dave said:

On Wednesday, 10 May 2017 14:03:23 UTC+1, peterN wrote:
On 5/9/2017 11:12 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-05-10 00:58:11 +0000, PeterN said:
On 5/9/2017 6:25 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-05-09 22:01:39 +0000, PeterN said:
On 5/9/2017 3:57 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-05-09 19:02:03 +0000, PeterN
said:
On 5/9/2017 1:54 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-05-09 17:34:25 +0000, android said:

In article ,
nap wrote:

In article ,
PeterN wrote:
[ ... ] I got a D500, which is an APS C, with a much higher
shutter
speed, than my FF. [ ... ]

1/8000 sec is much, much faster than 1/8000 sec.

I think that PeterN had the frame rate in mind, FPS...

I can live with as low as 5fps Cl, and I am happy to have 11fps
for
Ch.


The 800 doesn't go to 10 fps.

If you want to get that sort of rate out of a Nikon FF you will
have to
buy a D4S or D5.

There are a whole bunch of factors controlling frame rate. With
the
D800/D810 Nikons the inhibiting factor is the massive file size.

Couple that with a much slower rate when using the SD card over
the CF
card. According to a Lexar tech rep I met, the SD interface in the
D800 is slower than the CF interface.

Which it shouldn't be, but if you are shooting Ch, one would think
that
that if one slot was performance downgraded, you would select the
medium
which performed best. Even then the difference between the two
isn't
going to be the biggest factor in slowing down the Ch rate, it is
still
going to be the file size and the ability for the buffer to clear.
The
4fps rate found in the specs is the performance ceiling, not a big
issue
in a studio, or for landscapes.


There is a reason the FF Nikons best suited for high frame rate
sport
shooting are the D4S 16MP(10fps) and D5 20MP (11fps). The
D800/D810
while having great resolution is limited to 4fps before the
buffer
just
chokes on those fat NEF files.

The question I have is, just how important is a very high frame
rate for
you?

If you are satisfied, great. I would think that the higher frame
rate
gives me a chance of getting the wings of a bird in just the right
position.

Probably. It is just one method for capturing that magnificent
miracle
shot, but still no guarantee. There are additional factors
involved,
incuding, but not limited to stuff such as AF-C tracking.

I am NOT saying that a lower FR is not good for animals & birds.

I found that where the target is passing through a practical
capture, or composition window, at an airshow, or motorsport
event
for
example a 5
to 11 frame burst is the most that is actually practical. I
typically
end up with a usable burst of 5 to 8 frames, and can find a
single
frame, or perhaps two to work on.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/apoel49w3s05ota/screenshot_48.jpg

When I have shot an event such as the triathlon cyclists making a
slow
climb towards me up an extremely steep hill, Cl at 4-5fps is just
fine, 8-11fps is too much, and just over-kill.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/93je2mw5g665zbk/screenshot_47.jpg

There is a difference between shooting live critters and cars.

Are not pilots, drivers, and cyclists live critters?

Most of the time their vehicles are the subject. The expressions on
the planes and cares do not change.

However, for some odd reason the expressions on cyclists seem to
change
quite often.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/jtpwq70bxjf7dhg/DSF2420-E.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/cit0eig1wcbplnh/DSF2575-E.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7xgpw562ct8exl4/DSF2716-E.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/b9iscn0ugjcwtgw/DSF2775-E.jpg


I like the first and fourth, best.

I suspect there are more birds and monkeys, than cyclists.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmqUpJMVBWY


I used to have a budgie that rode on the back of a toy jeep, seemed to
really like it. No photos, it was before I had a camera.

If you like the concept of birds in toy vehicles there is a somewhat
disturbing scene in the movie "The Salton Sea" which takes that idea to
a different level.
Bird lovers should not watch.
https://youtu.be/In3vPyyLbI0


The above still applies! This is why organizations like the Goog should
be forced into accountability and to take more responsibility on that
what they publish:


yes they should stick to doing this to more recent polititions....
I;d find it difficulyt to not want to take a shot at Trump, Boris, Osborne
and perhaps Farage.


You do realize that that was an unauthorized liquidation of four
innocent messenger pigeons. BirdieSnuffSnuff! :-ppp


https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/...assination%20S
cene%20%5BThe%20Salton%20Sea%5D%20RINNSTEINPROPHET %20RINNSTEINPROPHET%20.
jpg
--
teleportation kills

--
teleportation kills
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.