A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ASA rating and quality



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 29th 04, 01:52 AM
Chuck Frodermann
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default ASA rating and quality

I am begining to look at a digital SLR and have noticed a difference in ASA
rating capability. My question for low light photos is the effect of A
qutieSA similar between digital and film. As film photos granular the
higher value ASA film used. Since the media does not change as in film does
the quality suffer equally in digital.

Chuck



  #2  
Old September 29th 04, 05:22 AM
Skip M
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Chuck Frodermann" wrote in message
...
I am begining to look at a digital SLR and have noticed a difference in

ASA
rating capability. My question for low light photos is the effect of A
qutieSA similar between digital and film. As film photos granular the
higher value ASA film used. Since the media does not change as in film

does
the quality suffer equally in digital.

Chuck




If I understand your question correctly, yes it does degrade the higher ASA
(ISO) you use. It adds "noise" which appears in the image as a grainy look.
However, some cameras are more prone to noise than others at the same ISO,
and others are better. Just like some films had better grain than others at
the same ISO.

--
Skip Middleton
http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com


  #3  
Old September 29th 04, 06:09 AM
David Dyer-Bennet
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Chuck Frodermann" writes:

I am begining to look at a digital SLR and have noticed a difference
in ASA rating capability. My question for low light photos is the
effect of A qutieSA similar between digital and film. As film
photos granular the higher value ASA film used. Since the media
does not change as in film does the quality suffer equally in
digital.


There is increased noise at high ISO settings in digital cameras.

However, the rate of decay is not nearly as bad as the problems with
high-speed film, so I wouldn't say it suffers "equally".
--
David Dyer-Bennet, , http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/
RKBA: http://noguns-nomoney.com/ http://www.dd-b.net/carry/
Pics: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/
Dragaera/Steven Brust: http://dragaera.info/
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Since the quality of digital 135 SRL is closely to 120 ¦ÊÅܤpÄå - Lingual Medium Format Photography Equipment 264 August 2nd 04 04:31 AM
Digital quality (vs 35mm): Any real answers? Toralf 35mm Photo Equipment 274 July 30th 04 12:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.