If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Long term archive of digi-files .. suggestion
I have been burning CDs to keep most of my image files. Is there any diff
between the major brands Imation, Maxel, Memorex, etc, etc ?? or is it one of those things that one company makes most CD's and multiple companies put their name on them. What is the best for long term image archive CD's, other media ?? and if CD's any recommendations ?? Also, is there image quality loss during the transfer/burning process ?? I did "google" first and didn't any major discussion. Apologize if this is rehashing an old issue. -- Bruce Wilson San Antonio, TX -- Shutter City Gallery -- http://www.shuttercity.com/ShowGallery.cfm?AcctID=4823 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
From: "Bruce Wilson"
I have been burning CDs to keep most of my image files. Is there any diff between the major brands Imation, Maxel, Memorex, etc, etc ? Different coatings mean different estimated life-span. The old Kodak Ultima Gold ones were the best but have been phased out. Here's some info on CD longevity ... the cheaper 15 cent ones probably won't last a year, and CD-RW's are not long-lasting either. http://www.inkjetart.com/mitsui/index.html http://www.silverace.com/dottyspotty/issue12.html is there image quality loss during the transfer/burning process ?? No, it either burns right or it doesn't. What is the best for long term image archive CD's, other media ? After accumulating a couple hundred CD-R's I figured there had to be a better way ... one problem with CD-R's is you never know if they're bad until you really need them a couple years later unless you periodically read them. I switched to external hard drives for back-up, now that the price has dropped so low. I saw a 160 GB IOGear model for $99 today at Fry's for example. This is equivalent in storage to about 250 standard CD's but far more flexible (and smaller). We keep all our archived RAW files on three of these, with the same files on every one and one of them is stored off-site for extra safety. We rotate the off-site disk in every time we finish a project and update it. These connect via USB 2 or Firewire (or both) and are pretty fast. I know they'll go bad sooner or later (all disks do) but so long as you have multiple copies of the files you're OK, especially with one stored elsewhere. DVD-R's are another solution but have the same long term problems as CD-Rs except you need fewer of them. Bill |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
From: "Bruce Wilson"
I have been burning CDs to keep most of my image files. Is there any diff between the major brands Imation, Maxel, Memorex, etc, etc ? Different coatings mean different estimated life-span. The old Kodak Ultima Gold ones were the best but have been phased out. Here's some info on CD longevity ... the cheaper 15 cent ones probably won't last a year, and CD-RW's are not long-lasting either. http://www.inkjetart.com/mitsui/index.html http://www.silverace.com/dottyspotty/issue12.html is there image quality loss during the transfer/burning process ?? No, it either burns right or it doesn't. What is the best for long term image archive CD's, other media ? After accumulating a couple hundred CD-R's I figured there had to be a better way ... one problem with CD-R's is you never know if they're bad until you really need them a couple years later unless you periodically read them. I switched to external hard drives for back-up, now that the price has dropped so low. I saw a 160 GB IOGear model for $99 today at Fry's for example. This is equivalent in storage to about 250 standard CD's but far more flexible (and smaller). We keep all our archived RAW files on three of these, with the same files on every one and one of them is stored off-site for extra safety. We rotate the off-site disk in every time we finish a project and update it. These connect via USB 2 or Firewire (or both) and are pretty fast. I know they'll go bad sooner or later (all disks do) but so long as you have multiple copies of the files you're OK, especially with one stored elsewhere. DVD-R's are another solution but have the same long term problems as CD-Rs except you need fewer of them. Bill |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On 2004-08-18, Bruce Wilson wrote:
I have been burning CDs to keep most of my image files. Is there any diff between the major brands Imation, Maxel, Memorex, etc, etc ?? or is it one of those things that one company makes most CD's and multiple companies put their name on them. There are some companies that make CDs that are specifically meant for archiving. They supposedly will last much longer. You should be able to find them with Google. What is the best for long term image archive CD's, other media ?? and if CD's any recommendations ?? Also, is there image quality loss during the transfer/burning process ?? There is no image quality loss. The CD is an exact copy of the file from your computer. The most important thing when archiving any important data is to not rely on a single archival copy. Make sure that each image is archived onto at least two different CDs. For extra safety, keep one of the CDs in a separate location (it doesn't do any good to have two copies if they both get burned up in the same fire!) (And speaking of fire, note that most "fireproof" safes will *not* protect CDs. What they mean by "fireproof" is that in a fire of the intensity and duration the safe is rated to withstand, it won't get hot enough inside to burn paper. Unfortunately, the temperature at which paper ignites is much higher than the temperature at which CDs are damaged). It's a good idea to periodically rearchive things. When a given archive disc gets to be a few years or so old, read it onto the computer, and burn a new one. -- --Tim Smith |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On 2004-08-18, Bruce Wilson wrote:
I have been burning CDs to keep most of my image files. Is there any diff between the major brands Imation, Maxel, Memorex, etc, etc ?? or is it one of those things that one company makes most CD's and multiple companies put their name on them. There are some companies that make CDs that are specifically meant for archiving. They supposedly will last much longer. You should be able to find them with Google. What is the best for long term image archive CD's, other media ?? and if CD's any recommendations ?? Also, is there image quality loss during the transfer/burning process ?? There is no image quality loss. The CD is an exact copy of the file from your computer. The most important thing when archiving any important data is to not rely on a single archival copy. Make sure that each image is archived onto at least two different CDs. For extra safety, keep one of the CDs in a separate location (it doesn't do any good to have two copies if they both get burned up in the same fire!) (And speaking of fire, note that most "fireproof" safes will *not* protect CDs. What they mean by "fireproof" is that in a fire of the intensity and duration the safe is rated to withstand, it won't get hot enough inside to burn paper. Unfortunately, the temperature at which paper ignites is much higher than the temperature at which CDs are damaged). It's a good idea to periodically rearchive things. When a given archive disc gets to be a few years or so old, read it onto the computer, and burn a new one. -- --Tim Smith |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On 2004-08-18, Bruce Wilson wrote:
I have been burning CDs to keep most of my image files. Is there any diff between the major brands Imation, Maxel, Memorex, etc, etc ?? or is it one of those things that one company makes most CD's and multiple companies put their name on them. There are some companies that make CDs that are specifically meant for archiving. They supposedly will last much longer. You should be able to find them with Google. What is the best for long term image archive CD's, other media ?? and if CD's any recommendations ?? Also, is there image quality loss during the transfer/burning process ?? There is no image quality loss. The CD is an exact copy of the file from your computer. The most important thing when archiving any important data is to not rely on a single archival copy. Make sure that each image is archived onto at least two different CDs. For extra safety, keep one of the CDs in a separate location (it doesn't do any good to have two copies if they both get burned up in the same fire!) (And speaking of fire, note that most "fireproof" safes will *not* protect CDs. What they mean by "fireproof" is that in a fire of the intensity and duration the safe is rated to withstand, it won't get hot enough inside to burn paper. Unfortunately, the temperature at which paper ignites is much higher than the temperature at which CDs are damaged). It's a good idea to periodically rearchive things. When a given archive disc gets to be a few years or so old, read it onto the computer, and burn a new one. -- --Tim Smith |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:43:56 GMT, "Bruce Wilson"
wrote: I have been burning CDs to keep most of my image files. Is there any diff between the major brands Imation, Maxel, Memorex, etc, etc ?? or is it one of those things that one company makes most CD's and multiple companies put their name on them. What is the best for long term image archive CD's, other media ?? and if CD's any recommendations ?? Also, is there image quality loss during the transfer/burning process ?? I did "google" first and didn't any major discussion. Apologize if this is rehashing an old issue. -- Bruce Wilson San Antonio, TX Personal opinion: It's been my experience that the burner plays a much larger role in this than the brand of CD you buy. A good burner will burn just abut anything you throw at it; the $59.94 special burner is much more particular. I've had a bunch of dofferent burners, starting with a SCSI 2X burner. My current burner is a SONY DRU-510A; it will burn the cheapest CD-Rs I can find, and they last. Friends with the Fry's cut-rate specials are faster, if they use the expensive disks. If not, they get a lot of coasters. Bill Funk Change "g" to "a" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:43:56 GMT, "Bruce Wilson"
wrote: I have been burning CDs to keep most of my image files. Is there any diff between the major brands Imation, Maxel, Memorex, etc, etc ?? or is it one of those things that one company makes most CD's and multiple companies put their name on them. What is the best for long term image archive CD's, other media ?? and if CD's any recommendations ?? Also, is there image quality loss during the transfer/burning process ?? I did "google" first and didn't any major discussion. Apologize if this is rehashing an old issue. -- Bruce Wilson San Antonio, TX Personal opinion: It's been my experience that the burner plays a much larger role in this than the brand of CD you buy. A good burner will burn just abut anything you throw at it; the $59.94 special burner is much more particular. I've had a bunch of dofferent burners, starting with a SCSI 2X burner. My current burner is a SONY DRU-510A; it will burn the cheapest CD-Rs I can find, and they last. Friends with the Fry's cut-rate specials are faster, if they use the expensive disks. If not, they get a lot of coasters. Bill Funk Change "g" to "a" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Bruce Wilson" wrote:
I have been burning CDs to keep most of my image files. What the heck for? CD's (even DVD's) do not have enough capacity for even modest collections of images (mine is 30GB; I expect to be at 80 or 100 by the end of the year -- the thought of doing that in CD's or DVD's scares me). Be sensible and get a portable HD unit. You'll be so glad you did. And yes, this is a rehashed rehashed rehash of a rehashed question. google-groups: group:rec.photo.digital archive portable disk (and other variations) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Bruce Wilson" wrote:
I have been burning CDs to keep most of my image files. What the heck for? CD's (even DVD's) do not have enough capacity for even modest collections of images (mine is 30GB; I expect to be at 80 or 100 by the end of the year -- the thought of doing that in CD's or DVD's scares me). Be sensible and get a portable HD unit. You'll be so glad you did. And yes, this is a rehashed rehashed rehash of a rehashed question. google-groups: group:rec.photo.digital archive portable disk (and other variations) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|