If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak DX6490 Lens adapter and exposure problems
Santa brought me a lens adapter and a UV filter for my Kodak DX6490 For
those not familiar with the camera, the adapter which is about 1.25" long threads onto the front of the camera surrounding the lens to protect it when it is extended, it also allows you to mount 55mm accessory filters http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQueri...q-locale=en_US. This works very well; however, my problem is that now all my pictures (well the ones I took Christmas Day where the on camera flash was used at full wide, I have yet to try a test at zoom) are under exposed. I have tried several shots at full wide using the same exposure settings in both auto and manual mode ; with and without the adapter and with/without my UV filter and the shots with the adapter (with/without a filter) in place are flat and underexposed . I don't get a good result until I remove the adapter from the camera. I haven't had a chance to try outdoor exposures yet, but I can't see why things would be any different. Can someone explain this and perhaps tell me how to compensate for it? Ron Baird, has this been noted before it would be the same on the new DX7590? Care to comment? Brian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The adapter blocks part of the onboard flash and can't be used with the
onboard flash. The adapter doesn't affect non flash operations. Ken Miller "Roots750" wrote in message ... Santa brought me a lens adapter and a UV filter for my Kodak DX6490 For those not familiar with the camera, the adapter which is about 1.25" long threads onto the front of the camera surrounding the lens to protect it when it is extended, it also allows you to mount 55mm accessory filters http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQueri...q-locale=en_US. This works very well; however, my problem is that now all my pictures (well the ones I took Christmas Day where the on camera flash was used at full wide, I have yet to try a test at zoom) are under exposed. I have tried several shots at full wide using the same exposure settings in both auto and manual mode ; with and without the adapter and with/without my UV filter and the shots with the adapter (with/without a filter) in place are flat and underexposed . I don't get a good result until I remove the adapter from the camera. I haven't had a chance to try outdoor exposures yet, but I can't see why things would be any different. Can someone explain this and perhaps tell me how to compensate for it? Ron Baird, has this been noted before it would be the same on the new DX7590? Care to comment? Brian |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What he says is correct. You need to read the manual. It is mentioned in
there. "Kenneth Miller" wrote in message ... The adapter blocks part of the onboard flash and can't be used with the onboard flash. The adapter doesn't affect non flash operations. Ken Miller "Roots750" wrote in message ... Santa brought me a lens adapter and a UV filter for my Kodak DX6490 For those not familiar with the camera, the adapter which is about 1.25" long threads onto the front of the camera surrounding the lens to protect it when it is extended, it also allows you to mount 55mm accessory filters http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQueri...q-locale=en_US. This works very well; however, my problem is that now all my pictures (well the ones I took Christmas Day where the on camera flash was used at full wide, I have yet to try a test at zoom) are under exposed. I have tried several shots at full wide using the same exposure settings in both auto and manual mode ; with and without the adapter and with/without my UV filter and the shots with the adapter (with/without a filter) in place are flat and underexposed . I don't get a good result until I remove the adapter from the camera. I haven't had a chance to try outdoor exposures yet, but I can't see why things would be any different. Can someone explain this and perhaps tell me how to compensate for it? Ron Baird, has this been noted before it would be the same on the new DX7590? Care to comment? Brian |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I have tested outdoors and do not experience the same problem with the
adapter in place. With the camera in Auto mode, when using the flash the only speed available is ISO 80. I don't see how, but could this be part of the problem? "Roots750" wrote in message ... Santa brought me a lens adapter and a UV filter for my Kodak DX6490 For those not familiar with the camera, the adapter which is about 1.25" long threads onto the front of the camera surrounding the lens to protect it when it is extended, it also allows you to mount 55mm accessory filters http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQueri...q-locale=en_US. This works very well; however, my problem is that now all my pictures (well the ones I took Christmas Day where the on camera flash was used at full wide, I have yet to try a test at zoom) are under exposed. I have tried several shots at full wide using the same exposure settings in both auto and manual mode ; with and without the adapter and with/without my UV filter and the shots with the adapter (with/without a filter) in place are flat and underexposed . I don't get a good result until I remove the adapter from the camera. I haven't had a chance to try outdoor exposures yet, but I can't see why things would be any different. Can someone explain this and perhaps tell me how to compensate for it? Ron Baird, has this been noted before it would be the same on the new DX7590? Care to comment? Brian |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Can you tell me what manual you are referring to and where the specific
reference can be found ? Is it for the manual for the DX6490 ? Mine was printed in early 2003 before the lens adapter was developed. "Toomanyputters" wrote in message m... What he says is correct. You need to read the manual. It is mentioned in there. "Kenneth Miller" wrote in message ... The adapter blocks part of the onboard flash and can't be used with the onboard flash. The adapter doesn't affect non flash operations. Ken Miller "Roots750" wrote in message ... Santa brought me a lens adapter and a UV filter for my Kodak DX6490 For those not familiar with the camera, the adapter which is about 1.25" long threads onto the front of the camera surrounding the lens to protect it when it is extended, it also allows you to mount 55mm accessory filters http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQueri...q-locale=en_US. This works very well; however, my problem is that now all my pictures (well the ones I took Christmas Day where the on camera flash was used at full wide, I have yet to try a test at zoom) are under exposed. I have tried several shots at full wide using the same exposure settings in both auto and manual mode ; with and without the adapter and with/without my UV filter and the shots with the adapter (with/without a filter) in place are flat and underexposed . I don't get a good result until I remove the adapter from the camera. I haven't had a chance to try outdoor exposures yet, but I can't see why things would be any different. Can someone explain this and perhaps tell me how to compensate for it? Ron Baird, has this been noted before it would be the same on the new DX7590? Care to comment? Brian |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
It's somewhere in that manual. Sorry, but I returned the camera to Costco
and got a DSLR camera from Canon. I only have problems on closeup photos with the adapter. Distant shots were not effected. "Roots750" wrote in message .. . Can you tell me what manual you are referring to and where the specific reference can be found ? Is it for the manual for the DX6490 ? Mine was printed in early 2003 before the lens adapter was developed. "Toomanyputters" wrote in message m... What he says is correct. You need to read the manual. It is mentioned in there. "Kenneth Miller" wrote in message ... The adapter blocks part of the onboard flash and can't be used with the onboard flash. The adapter doesn't affect non flash operations. Ken Miller "Roots750" wrote in message ... Santa brought me a lens adapter and a UV filter for my Kodak DX6490 For those not familiar with the camera, the adapter which is about 1.25" long threads onto the front of the camera surrounding the lens to protect it when it is extended, it also allows you to mount 55mm accessory filters http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQueri...q-locale=en_US. This works very well; however, my problem is that now all my pictures (well the ones I took Christmas Day where the on camera flash was used at full wide, I have yet to try a test at zoom) are under exposed. I have tried several shots at full wide using the same exposure settings in both auto and manual mode ; with and without the adapter and with/without my UV filter and the shots with the adapter (with/without a filter) in place are flat and underexposed . I don't get a good result until I remove the adapter from the camera. I haven't had a chance to try outdoor exposures yet, but I can't see why things would be any different. Can someone explain this and perhaps tell me how to compensate for it? Ron Baird, has this been noted before it would be the same on the new DX7590? Care to comment? Brian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nikon announces new flagship **FILM** SLR – the F6! | Peter Lawrence | 35mm Photo Equipment | 228 | October 15th 04 12:40 AM |
Leaf Shutter questions for project camera | Gordon Moat | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 63 | September 20th 04 09:12 PM |
New Canon SLR with no 1.6x cropping?? | Charlie Self | Digital Photography | 93 | August 4th 04 05:53 AM |