If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Electronic Vs Mechanical Shutter
I have to say I'm not really sure how an electronic shutter even works,
but was wondering why dSLR cameras don't use them. At least the dSLRs that I am aware of don't. Don't all if not most all video cameras use some kind of electronic shutter? -- Chris W KE5GIX "Protect your digital freedom and privacy, eliminate DRM, learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm" Ham Radio Repeater Database. http://hrrdb.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Electronic Vs Mechanical Shutter
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:01:17 -0500, Chris W wrote:
I have to say I'm not really sure how an electronic shutter even works, but was wondering why dSLR cameras don't use them. At least the dSLRs that I am aware of don't. Don't all if not most all video cameras use some kind of electronic shutter? Electronic shutters require some extra circuitry at each pixel to store the charge accumulated while the electronic shutter was open. Since the pixel is always sensitive to light, the charge accumulated while the electronic shutter was open has to be stored somewhere while it's being read off the sensor. That extra circuitry at each pixel takes up space on the substrate that could otherwise be used to make the photosensitive pixels larger. A sensor that uses an mechanical shutter doesn't need that extra circuitry, so the pixels can be larger, gather more light and be more sensitive with less noise for the same sensor size. Of course, without that extra circuitry to store the charge, the sensor is still sensitive to light and will accumulate more charge while it's being read off into the camera if there's still a light source on it. That's why you need the mechanical shutter. If the sensor was still exposed to light while it was being read off, you'd have ghosting and blurring of the image because the entire sensor isn't read simultaneously. The data is streamed off. Some video cameras also have mechanical shutters of the same type as was used with film motion picture cameras. So the simple answer is that, all else being equal, a camera with a mechanical shutter will have higher sensitivity and lower noise than one with an electronic shutter. That comes at the expense of simplicity and longevity. Steve |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Electronic Vs Mechanical Shutter
In article , Chris W
wrote: I have to say I'm not really sure how an electronic shutter even works, but was wondering why dSLR cameras don't use them. At least the dSLRs that I am aware of don't. Don't all if not most all video cameras use some kind of electronic shutter? the nikon d40, d50, d70 and d70s all had a combination electronic and mechanical shutter which gave them the unique ability to have a faster than usual flash sync. officially it was 1/500th, but by using a non-nikon flash, it would sync at any shutter speed, all the way up to 1/8000th. unfortunately, they were more susceptible to blooming. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Electronic Vs Mechanical Shutter
"nospam" wrote in message ... In article , Chris W wrote: I have to say I'm not really sure how an electronic shutter even works, but was wondering why dSLR cameras don't use them. At least the dSLRs that I am aware of don't. Don't all if not most all video cameras use some kind of electronic shutter? the nikon d40, d50, d70 and d70s all had a combination electronic and mechanical shutter which gave them the unique ability to have a faster than usual flash sync. officially it was 1/500th, but by using a non-nikon flash, it would sync at any shutter speed, all the way up to 1/8000th. unfortunately, they were more susceptible to blooming. Thank you for those answers. I have had the same question on my mind. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Electronic Vs Mechanical Shutter
In article , Steve says...
Electronic shutters require some extra circuitry at each pixel to store the charge accumulated while the electronic shutter was open. Since the pixel is always sensitive to light, the charge accumulated while the electronic shutter was open has to be stored somewhere while it's being read off the sensor. That extra circuitry at each pixel takes up space on the substrate that could otherwise be used to make the photosensitive pixels larger. I would have thought that electronic shutters were implemented with some kind of pixel level switch which would prevent the pixel from accepting more charge when the switch was closed and would be able to discharge the pixels - or something similar. Perhaps an electric field applied to each pixel which would freeze the charge inside the pixels. -- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus 50X0, 8080, E3X0, E4X0, E5X0 and E3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Electronic Vs Mechanical Shutter
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:57:26 +0100, Alfred Molon
wrote: In article , Steve says... Electronic shutters require some extra circuitry at each pixel to store the charge accumulated while the electronic shutter was open. Since the pixel is always sensitive to light, the charge accumulated while the electronic shutter was open has to be stored somewhere while it's being read off the sensor. That extra circuitry at each pixel takes up space on the substrate that could otherwise be used to make the photosensitive pixels larger. I would have thought that electronic shutters were implemented with some kind of pixel level switch which would prevent the pixel from accepting more charge when the switch was closed and would be able to discharge the pixels - or something similar. Perhaps an electric field applied to each pixel which would freeze the charge inside the pixels. That's sort of what they do, but they need extra electronics at each pixel to do that. Even a pixel level switch, or something to apply a field, or anything other than the actual photo sensor requires additional circuitry that would take space away from the actual photo sensor and decrease the sensor's light sensitivity. Conceptually, it works like this: The pixels can either dump the charge and start fresh or accumulate charge when photons hit them. There's no "hold mode" for the actual pixel sensor that holds current stored charge when more photons hit them. That's true for electronic and mechanical shutters. For the electronic shutter, before the beginning of exposure, charge is dumped from the pixels and the pixel charge storage unit. I.e., think of them as being grounded out. Then at the beginning of exposure, ground is disconnected, photons are allowed to create charge on the pixels, which are connected to their storage unit so they charge up the storage unit as well. Then after the specified exposure time, the pixels are disconnected from their storage units. The actual sensor pixels can be doing whatever they want with additional photons while the storage units are read off. They'll probably very quickly reach saturation and not store accumulate anymore. The storage units are not light sensitive. So as additional photons hit the sensor, they are unnaffected and can be read off without worrying about smearing and ghosting the image. For the mechanical shutter, at the beginning of exposure the pixel charge is dumped, the shutter opens, the shutter closes and the pixels are read. They are no longer receiving photons so they don't accumulate anymore charge while they're being read. So they can be read off without worrying about smearing and ghosting the image, and without needing a charge holder that's not sensitive to light like the electronic shutter needs. No need for non-light-sensitive charge holder means more space available for light-sensitive pixels means more sensitivity to light. Steve |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Electronic Vs Mechanical Shutter
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:57:26 +0100, Alfred Molon
wrote: In article , Steve says... Electronic shutters require some extra circuitry at each pixel to store the charge accumulated while the electronic shutter was open. Since the pixel is always sensitive to light, the charge accumulated while the electronic shutter was open has to be stored somewhere while it's being read off the sensor. That extra circuitry at each pixel takes up space on the substrate that could otherwise be used to make the photosensitive pixels larger. I would have thought that electronic shutters were implemented with some kind of pixel level switch which would prevent the pixel from accepting more charge when the switch was closed and would be able to discharge the pixels - or something similar. Perhaps an electric field applied to each pixel which would freeze the charge inside the pixels. Just to simplify the whole thing, no matter what you do for an electronic shutter (store charge, stop pixels from accepting more charge as photons hit them, whatever else you can think of) you need additional non-light-sensitive circuitry *at the pixel* to do something that a sensor designed for a mechanical shutter does not neet. The additional circuitry has to be at the pixel because of the way the charge is read off, i.e., not all pixels are read off the sensor simultaneously. This additional, non-light-sensitive circuitry at the pixel to implement the electronic shutter means that it's less sensitive to light than if it didn't have that circuitry and instead relied on mechanically shutting off the light. Steve |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Electronic Vs Mechanical Shutter
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:55:56 -0700, nospam wrote:
In article , Chris W wrote: I have to say I'm not really sure how an electronic shutter even works, but was wondering why dSLR cameras don't use them. At least the dSLRs that I am aware of don't. Don't all if not most all video cameras use some kind of electronic shutter? the nikon d40, d50, d70 and d70s all had a combination electronic and mechanical shutter which gave them the unique ability to have a faster than usual flash sync. officially it was 1/500th, but by using a non-nikon flash, it would sync at any shutter speed, all the way up to 1/8000th. unfortunately, they were more susceptible to blooming. Then there's the whole slew of P&S cameras that are able to sync up to 1/224,000th of a second exposures. 1/224,000th for flash duration, and 1/60,000th second for electronic shutter speed, without blooming. A far sight better than any ancient 1/8000 second limitation. This of course is also without exposing for any ambient light due to the agonizingly slow focal-plane shutters which must remain open to sync with the 1/8000 flash speed. This huge drawback of the ancient focal-plane shutter method completely blurs any portions of a moving subject while waiting for the shorter duration flash to fire, making that method's usefulness questionable and only in specific lighting situations. The ambient light has to be reduced enough to avoid this, if you have any control over it that is. These P&S cameras are now free of all those drawbacks and limitations of last century's focal-plane shutter designs. The sensors of these P&S cameras also capture the full frame in that one brief micro-exposure so there's not any evidence of sensor-reading delays as the information is spooled off, causing another type of banding problem with high-speed photography in most all DSLR designs. This common DSLR data-banding defect in images of high-speed subjects is due to banks of pixel data spooled off in independent chunks. In these P&S cameras it is captured first, then spooled off in-total later. All former problems with high-speed photography finally and completely circumvented. http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/Samples:_...%26_Flash-Sync http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/CameraFeatures |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Electronic Vs Mechanical Shutter
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:55:56 -0700, nospam wrote:
In article , Chris W wrote: I have to say I'm not really sure how an electronic shutter even works, but was wondering why dSLR cameras don't use them. At least the dSLRs that I am aware of don't. Don't all if not most all video cameras use some kind of electronic shutter? the nikon d40, d50, d70 and d70s all had a combination electronic and mechanical shutter which gave them the unique ability to have a faster than usual flash sync. officially it was 1/500th, but by using a non-nikon flash, it would sync at any shutter speed, all the way up to 1/8000th. unfortunately, they were more susceptible to blooming. The same high-synch speeds are possible with a Pentax DSLR (any model) with the correct flashgun (such as the Sigma 500 DG Super or the Pentax Af-360fgz, plus many others). It's not an electronic shutter in the camera, it's the flashgun strobing quickly so that the whole sensor is exposed sequentially as the open slit of the shutter passes the sensor. It's the "HS sync" setting on your flashgun. I would also hazard a guess that most of the DSLR cameras on the market can do the same trick with the appropriate flashgun attached. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Electronic Vs Mechanical Shutter
In article
, dj_nme wrote: the nikon d40, d50, d70 and d70s all had a combination electronic and mechanical shutter which gave them the unique ability to have a faster than usual flash sync. officially it was 1/500th, but by using a non-nikon flash, it would sync at any shutter speed, all the way up to 1/8000th. unfortunately, they were more susceptible to blooming. The same high-synch speeds are possible with a Pentax DSLR (any model) with the correct flashgun (such as the Sigma 500 DG Super or the Pentax Af-360fgz, plus many others). It's not an electronic shutter in the camera, it's the flashgun strobing quickly so that the whole sensor is exposed sequentially as the open slit of the shutter passes the sensor. It's the "HS sync" setting on your flashgun. I would also hazard a guess that most of the DSLR cameras on the market can do the same trick with the appropriate flashgun attached. perhaps that's how it works on the pentax, but on the aforementioned nikons, no special high speed sync mode is needed, and it does not even require a special flash. the cameras use a combination electronic and mechanical shutter -- the shutter is fully open at a more common sync speed and then the sensor is read out at the faster speed. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: Control Device for Compur electronic 5 FS shutter | [email protected] | Large Format Photography Equipment | 0 | January 31st 08 03:22 PM |
Need of mechanical shutter | [email protected] | Digital SLR Cameras | 14 | January 13th 07 10:39 PM |
No mechanical shutter and TIFF | LOP | Digital Photography | 32 | January 24th 06 07:37 PM |
Digital camera no mechanical shutter | LOP | Digital Photography | 8 | January 21st 06 07:13 PM |
FA: NIKON MC-20 ELECTRONIC SHUTTER RELEASE *LN* | Planar1 | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | October 1st 03 04:39 AM |