A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Care for Some Gum?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old October 12th 17, 06:37 AM posted to rec.photo.digital, alt.photography
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,718
Default Care for Some Gum?

On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck
said:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg
https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg


Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg


Now that's my type of image.


I thought you might like the concept.;-)

I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random application/placing
and mix of color.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

  #12  
Old October 12th 17, 07:22 AM posted to rec.photo.digital,alt.photography
PeterN[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 347
Default Care for Some Gum?

On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck
said:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg
https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg

Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg


Now that's my type of image.


I thought you might like the concept.;-)

I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random application/placing
and mix of color.


Actually Pollack is not pure random.

My concept of abstract is determined by the original image.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsnwaj7j/Marshall%20Point%20Lighthouse.jpg?dl=0

--
PeterN
  #13  
Old October 12th 17, 07:44 AM posted to rec.photo.digital, alt.photography
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,718
Default Care for Some Gum?

On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck
said:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg
https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg

Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg

Now that's my type of image.


I thought you might like the concept.;-)

I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random application/placing
and mix of color.


Actually Pollack is not pure random.


I know.There is just something about the *gum* patterns which resonates.

His application is actually quite deliberate as demonstrated in the patterns
in many of his larger works. There are a few I am very familiar with. One
which I encountered in the flesh, and have returned to wonder at many times
over the last 45+ years, is Pollock #2 at the Munson, Williams, Procter Art
Institute in Utica, NY.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ar707s2ofbuh579/DSC_0547-E.jpg


My concept of abstract is determined by the original image.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsnwaj7j/Marshall%20Point%20Lighthouse.jpg


I always thought your concept of abstract was determined by what you did to
the original image.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

  #14  
Old October 12th 17, 03:27 PM posted to rec.photo.digital,alt.photography
PeterN[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 347
Default Care for Some Gum?

On 10/12/2017 2:44 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck
said:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg
https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg

Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg

Now that's my type of image.

I thought you might like the concept.;-)

I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random application/placing
and mix of color.


Actually Pollack is not pure random.


I know.There is just something about the *gum* patterns which resonates.

His application is actually quite deliberate as demonstrated in the patterns
in many of his larger works. There are a few I am very familiar with. One
which I encountered in the flesh, and have returned to wonder at many times
over the last 45+ years, is Pollock #2 at the Munson, Williams, Procter Art
Institute in Utica, NY.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ar707s2ofbuh579/DSC_0547-E.jpg


My concept of abstract is determined by the original image.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsnwaj7j/Marshall%20Point%20Lighthouse.jpg


I always thought your concept of abstract was determined by what you did to
the original image.


The image tells me what to do.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/9xay7e4rqiz393m/Blaack%20Eyed%20Susan.jpg?dl=0

--
PeterN
  #15  
Old October 12th 17, 04:00 PM posted to rec.photo.digital, alt.photography
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,718
Default Care for Some Gum?

On Oct 12, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/12/2017 2:44 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck
said:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg
https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg

Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg

Now that's my type of image.

I thought you might like the concept.;-)

I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random application/placing
and mix of color.

Actually Pollack is not pure random.


I know.There is just something about the *gum* patterns which resonates.

His application is actually quite deliberate as demonstrated in the patterns
in many of his larger works. There are a few I am very familiar with. One
which I encountered in the flesh, and have returned to wonder at many times
over the last 45+ years, is Pollock #2 at the Munson, Williams, Procter Art
Institute in Utica, NY.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ar707s2ofbuh579/DSC_0547-E.jpg


My concept of abstract is determined by the original image.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsn...0Lighthouse.jp
g


I always thought your concept of abstract was determined by what you did to
the original image.


The image tells me what to do.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/9xay7e4rqiz393m/Blaack%20Eyed%20Susan.jpg?dl=0


....er, OK...

--

Regards,
Savageduck

  #16  
Old October 12th 17, 04:48 PM posted to rec.photo.digital,alt.photography
PeterN[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 347
Default Care for Some Gum?

On 10/12/2017 11:00 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 12, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/12/2017 2:44 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck
said:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg
https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg

Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg

Now that's my type of image.

I thought you might like the concept.;-)

I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random application/placing
and mix of color.

Actually Pollack is not pure random.

I know.There is just something about the *gum* patterns which resonates.

His application is actually quite deliberate as demonstrated in the patterns
in many of his larger works. There are a few I am very familiar with. One
which I encountered in the flesh, and have returned to wonder at many times
over the last 45+ years, is Pollock #2 at the Munson, Williams, Procter Art
Institute in Utica, NY.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ar707s2ofbuh579/DSC_0547-E.jpg


My concept of abstract is determined by the original image.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsn...0Lighthouse.jp
g

I always thought your concept of abstract was determined by what you did to
the original image.


The image tells me what to do.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/9xay7e4rqiz393m/Blaack%20Eyed%20Susan.jpg?dl=0


...er, OK...


And sometimes it tells me to do this:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zza0n01cabpmecj/20170205_Flowers_0056.jpg?dl=0

--
PeterN
  #17  
Old October 12th 17, 05:07 PM posted to rec.photo.digital,alt.photography
David_B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15
Default Care for Some Gum?

On 12-Oct-17 4:00 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 12, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/12/2017 2:44 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck
said:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg
https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg

Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg

Now that's my type of image.

I thought you might like the concept.;-)

I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random application/placing
and mix of color.

Actually Pollack is not pure random.

I know.There is just something about the *gum* patterns which resonates.

His application is actually quite deliberate as demonstrated in the patterns
in many of his larger works. There are a few I am very familiar with. One
which I encountered in the flesh, and have returned to wonder at many times
over the last 45+ years, is Pollock #2 at the Munson, Williams, Procter Art
Institute in Utica, NY.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ar707s2ofbuh579/DSC_0547-E.jpg


My concept of abstract is determined by the original image.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsn...0Lighthouse.jp
g

I always thought your concept of abstract was determined by what you did to
the original image.


The image tells me what to do.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/9xay7e4rqiz393m/Blaack%20Eyed%20Susan.jpg?dl=0


...er, OK...


That seem like a nonsense response to me. :-(

David B.


  #18  
Old October 12th 17, 05:32 PM posted to rec.photo.digital, alt.photography
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,718
Default Care for Some Gum?

On Oct 12, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/12/2017 11:00 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 12, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/12/2017 2:44 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck
said:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg
https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg

Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg

Now that's my type of image.

I thought you might like the concept.;-)

I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random
application/placing and mix of color.

Actually Pollack is not pure random.

I know.There is just something about the *gum* patterns which resonates.

His application is actually quite deliberate as demonstrated in the
patterns in many of his larger works. There are a few I am very familiar with. One
which I encountered in the flesh, and have returned to wonder at many
times over the last 45+ years, is Pollock #2 at the Munson, Williams, Procter
Art Institute in Utica, NY.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ar707s2ofbuh579/DSC_0547-E.jpg


My concept of abstract is determined by the original image.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsnwaj7j/Marshall%20Point%20Lighthouse.jpg

I always thought your concept of abstract was determined by what you did
to the original image.

The image tells me what to do.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/9xay7e4rqiz393m/Blaack%20Eyed%20Susan.jpg?dl=0


...er, OK...


And sometimes it tells me to do this:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zza0n01cabpmecj/20170205_Flowers_0056.jpg?dl=0


Again, OK!

....but WTF do any of those PeterN manipulations have to do with gum stuck to
an alley wall, or Jackson Pollock?

--

Regards,
Savageduck

  #19  
Old October 12th 17, 05:39 PM posted to rec.photo.digital, alt.photography
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,718
Default Care for Some Gum?

On Oct 12, 2017, David_B wrote
(in article ):

On 12-Oct-17 4:00 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 12, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/12/2017 2:44 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck
said:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg
https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg

Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg

Now that's my type of image.

I thought you might like the concept.;-)

I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random
application/placing and mix of color.

Actually Pollack is not pure random.

I know.There is just something about the *gum* patterns which resonates.

His application is actually quite deliberate as demonstrated in the
patterns in many of his larger works. There are a few I am very familiar with. One
which I encountered in the flesh, and have returned to wonder at many
times over the last 45+ years, is Pollock #2 at the Munson, Williams, Procter
Art Institute in Utica, NY.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ar707s2ofbuh579/DSC_0547-E.jpg


My concept of abstract is determined by the original image.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsnwaj7j/Marshall%20Point%20Lighthouse.jpg

I always thought your concept of abstract was determined by what you did
to the original image.

The image tells me what to do.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/9xay7e4rqiz393m/Blaack%20Eyed%20Susan.jpg?dl=0


...er, OK...


That seem like a nonsense response to me. :-(

David B.


Both responses, the one from Peter, and mine were nonsense responses. Peter
is always being instructed on what to do by his images, and he emphasized
that in his follow up post.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

  #20  
Old October 13th 17, 03:42 AM posted to rec.photo.digital,alt.photography
PeterN[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 347
Default Care for Some Gum?

On 10/12/2017 12:32 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 12, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/12/2017 11:00 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 12, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/12/2017 2:44 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/12/2017 1:37 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On Oct 11, 2017, PeterN wrote
(in article ):

On 10/11/2017 1:19 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-10-11 05:14:31 +0000, Savageduck
said:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/wnpt7op5dhq5ecy/DSCF5900.jpg
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qalqaj4u4ckopx/DSCF5897.jpg
https://www.dropbox-UNINTENDED DUPLICATE.jpg

Oops! I did one twice. Here is number 3.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yhaigx8l9hcqpin/DSCF5894.jpg

Now that's my type of image.

I thought you might like the concept.;-)

I find there is a Pollock feel to them with the random
application/placing and mix of color.

Actually Pollack is not pure random.

I know.There is just something about the *gum* patterns which resonates.

His application is actually quite deliberate as demonstrated in the
patterns in many of his larger works. There are a few I am very familiar with. One
which I encountered in the flesh, and have returned to wonder at many
times over the last 45+ years, is Pollock #2 at the Munson, Williams, Procter
Art Institute in Utica, NY.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ar707s2ofbuh579/DSC_0547-E.jpg


My concept of abstract is determined by the original image.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/865o53pgsnwaj7j/Marshall%20Point%20Lighthouse.jpg

I always thought your concept of abstract was determined by what you did
to the original image.

The image tells me what to do.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/9xay7e4rqiz393m/Blaack%20Eyed%20Susan.jpg?dl=0

...er, OK...


And sometimes it tells me to do this:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zza0n01cabpmecj/20170205_Flowers_0056.jpg?dl=0


Again, OK!

...but WTF do any of those PeterN manipulations have to do with gum stuck to
an alley wall, or Jackson Pollock?


They are not intended to remind someone that they were at a certain
place, or saw some object.
They are designed to create a feeling. I will be one of the first to
agree that probably more people don't like it, than do. Can't say for
sure, I never took a survey. If I like it, that's all that counts. If
someone else likes it, good. I have made someone else happy. We had a
theme competition at my CC. The theme was hands. Here is an
unmanipulated copy of my winning image, and my first runner-up,
although, obviously neither are human hands. The concept is that my
images are intended to be interpretations and representations.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/dxhgrljhcp97mbi/Hand%20of%20Nature.jpg?dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/mxkrww5aty119ut/Hands%20And%20a%20Foot.jpg?dl=0



--
PeterN
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Care For Some Gum? Savageduck[_3_] Digital Photography 1 November 5th 14 04:13 PM
Does anybody really care . . . Russell D. 35mm Photo Equipment 6 August 26th 12 04:16 AM
Why to care for our customers?? Gungun Digital Photography 0 March 20th 08 02:01 AM
Negatran Care John Rice In The Darkroom 1 April 11th 06 06:01 AM
The care of lenses John Large Format Photography Equipment 3 February 2nd 04 09:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2017 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.