If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How does ISO 400 in Digital Rebel compare to ISO 400 film?
I read that the Digital Rebel can do ISO 100 thru 1600. Are they
comparable to good film at the same ISO points? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Veggie" wrote in message ... I read that the Digital Rebel can do ISO 100 thru 1600. Are they comparable to good film at the same ISO points? The 300D is very low noise at ISO 100 and better than ISO 400 film, at that same sensitivity. 800 on the 300D is somewhat noisy and 1600 is not a good idea unless that is the only way to take a shot. Post processing can help with ISO 800 and 1600 shots from this camera. Google for "Neat Image" and others. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Veggie" wrote in message ... I read that the Digital Rebel can do ISO 100 thru 1600. Are they comparable to good film at the same ISO points? The 300D is very low noise at ISO 100 and better than ISO 400 film, at that same sensitivity. 800 on the 300D is somewhat noisy and 1600 is not a good idea unless that is the only way to take a shot. Post processing can help with ISO 800 and 1600 shots from this camera. Google for "Neat Image" and others. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I would say better than the same value than film..
"Charles Schuler" wrote in message ... "Veggie" wrote in message ... I read that the Digital Rebel can do ISO 100 thru 1600. Are they comparable to good film at the same ISO points? The 300D is very low noise at ISO 100 and better than ISO 400 film, at that same sensitivity. 800 on the 300D is somewhat noisy and 1600 is not a good idea unless that is the only way to take a shot. Post processing can help with ISO 800 and 1600 shots from this camera. Google for "Neat Image" and others. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I would say better than the same value than film..
"Charles Schuler" wrote in message ... "Veggie" wrote in message ... I read that the Digital Rebel can do ISO 100 thru 1600. Are they comparable to good film at the same ISO points? The 300D is very low noise at ISO 100 and better than ISO 400 film, at that same sensitivity. 800 on the 300D is somewhat noisy and 1600 is not a good idea unless that is the only way to take a shot. Post processing can help with ISO 800 and 1600 shots from this camera. Google for "Neat Image" and others. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
on the 300D Is the 10D any better, or does it use the same sensor as the 300D? Charles Schuler wrote: "Veggie" wrote in message m... I read that the Digital Rebel can do ISO 100 thru 1600. Are they comparable to good film at the same ISO points? The 300D is very low noise at ISO 100 and better than ISO 400 film, at that same sensitivity. 800 on the 300D is somewhat noisy and 1600 is not a good idea unless that is the only way to take a shot. Post processing can help with ISO 800 and 1600 shots from this camera. Google for "Neat Image" and others. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
on the 300D Is the 10D any better, or does it use the same sensor as the 300D? Charles Schuler wrote: "Veggie" wrote in message m... I read that the Digital Rebel can do ISO 100 thru 1600. Are they comparable to good film at the same ISO points? The 300D is very low noise at ISO 100 and better than ISO 400 film, at that same sensitivity. 800 on the 300D is somewhat noisy and 1600 is not a good idea unless that is the only way to take a shot. Post processing can help with ISO 800 and 1600 shots from this camera. Google for "Neat Image" and others. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Veggie wrote:
I read that the Digital Rebel can do ISO 100 thru 1600. Are they comparable to good film at the same ISO points? I would say that ISO400 on Rebel would be about the same as 200 ASA on film. You can get incredibly good results at ISO400, and very good at 800. ISO1600 is usable as a last resort option (something like 800 ASA film) but at that value you'll get some color clipping, especially in the reds. So, Digital Rebel is twice as good as any film when it comes down to grain, or to be precise - noise. Film grain and digital noise are nothing alike, because high sensitivity film is well... grainy. But high ISO setting on digital camera results as a pattern made of pixels that have different colours then they're supposed to. For example, you shoot at a clean red paper at ISO 1600 and get darker or greenish or bluish dots. Anyway, there are powerful programs that eliminate digital noise (and do a great job too) so you can stretch your options even further. I have 10D and shooting at ISO800 is something I feel completely comfortable with... Not somethnig I would do so easily a few years ago... -- ------------------------------ online photo portfolio www.stojcic.com " If you saw a man drowning and you could either save him or photograph the event, what film would you use?" - Anonymous |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Veggie wrote:
I read that the Digital Rebel can do ISO 100 thru 1600. Are they comparable to good film at the same ISO points? I would say that ISO400 on Rebel would be about the same as 200 ASA on film. You can get incredibly good results at ISO400, and very good at 800. ISO1600 is usable as a last resort option (something like 800 ASA film) but at that value you'll get some color clipping, especially in the reds. So, Digital Rebel is twice as good as any film when it comes down to grain, or to be precise - noise. Film grain and digital noise are nothing alike, because high sensitivity film is well... grainy. But high ISO setting on digital camera results as a pattern made of pixels that have different colours then they're supposed to. For example, you shoot at a clean red paper at ISO 1600 and get darker or greenish or bluish dots. Anyway, there are powerful programs that eliminate digital noise (and do a great job too) so you can stretch your options even further. I have 10D and shooting at ISO800 is something I feel completely comfortable with... Not somethnig I would do so easily a few years ago... -- ------------------------------ online photo portfolio www.stojcic.com " If you saw a man drowning and you could either save him or photograph the event, what film would you use?" - Anonymous |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Veggie wrote:
I read that the Digital Rebel can do ISO 100 thru 1600. Are they comparable to good film at the same ISO points? I would say that ISO400 on Rebel would be about the same as 200 ASA on film. You can get incredibly good results at ISO400, and very good at 800. ISO1600 is usable as a last resort option (something like 800 ASA film) but at that value you'll get some color clipping, especially in the reds. So, Digital Rebel is twice as good as any film when it comes down to grain, or to be precise - noise. Film grain and digital noise are nothing alike, because high sensitivity film is well... grainy. But high ISO setting on digital camera results as a pattern made of pixels that have different colours then they're supposed to. For example, you shoot at a clean red paper at ISO 1600 and get darker or greenish or bluish dots. Anyway, there are powerful programs that eliminate digital noise (and do a great job too) so you can stretch your options even further. I have 10D and shooting at ISO800 is something I feel completely comfortable with... Not somethnig I would do so easily a few years ago... -- ------------------------------ online photo portfolio www.stojcic.com " If you saw a man drowning and you could either save him or photograph the event, what film would you use?" - Anonymous |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Since the quality of digital 135 SRL is closely to 120 | ¦ÊÅܤpÄå - Lingual | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 264 | August 2nd 04 04:31 AM |
Digital quality (vs 35mm): Any real answers? | Toralf | 35mm Photo Equipment | 274 | July 30th 04 12:26 AM |
Digital quality (vs 35mm): Any real answers? | Toralf | Digital Photography | 213 | July 28th 04 06:30 PM |
What was wrong with film? | George | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 192 | March 4th 04 02:44 PM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 09:51 PM |